>Been DCA into VOO for a fair bit now>Realize I shouldn't squander this bull run and at least take an Index / ETF with more volatility if I don't wanna bet on individual stocks like Sandisk or Nvidia>Look at QQQ vs VOO real returns over time>QQQ and VOO just mirror each other, with some years performing the same, otherwise QQQ has almost exactly twice the gains and twice the loses (by % not year count) as VOOAs someone who is only 26, why would I not just go into the more volatile option here that still gives more returnsIs QQQ way too tech focused right now, not that VOO isn't tech focused, but I heard the Nasaq was bending the rules to allow these AI companies inPlease reply with actual advice, analysis, your own portfolios as examples, alternatives to these two without betting the farm, etc. I just wanna DCA my paychecks into shit without feeling like I missed the boat or FOMO (not that I have that much)Much appreciated.
>>62338660you already missed a lot of the difference. That said I'm still buying QQQ rather than other index funds bc everyone thinks we're already at the top of the tech bubble. Also don't make the noob mistake QQQM is technically better for longterm holding but it's marginal really
>>62338660>only 26You should be going deep on 0DTE 20% OTM calls on NVDA earnings
>>62338807why chase premiums? legit, why>>62338683sadly just wasn't fully employed until a year and a half ago.....
Bump
QQQ is going to tilt you in the direction of the tech boomVOO also includes you in this since they’re on the S&P anywayIt’s more growth but more volatilityQQQ is just a bias towards growth and VOO is a bias towards total market exposureAs long as those top companies remain heavily skewed in their profitability then go with QQQOr go with bothVOO and chill exists for a reason then it’s probably better like look into other ETFs that focus on a particular sector if you wanted more growth
>>62338660If you want to see why, look back fsrther than 2011.
>>62340967And i dont just mean 2008 either. Nasdaq got turbofucked in the ass with a sawzall in 2001 compared to the sp
>>62340967>>62340975I went back and compared CAGR and it just seems like a wash based on how much volatility you want
.
bumpin
26? Just do 50% SOXL leaps and 50% 0dte qqq
>>62343704Okay so go into something triple leveraged and just know exactly when to sell
>>62338660i only boughted schd
>>62343771i actually have a little, last i check up 25% but stable since then
