i want one of these retarded cast iron pumpkins so muchpls convince me not to blow $250
>>21644710Cleaning that doesn't look fun. It could be worse
>>21644715thats a good pointi havent been able to find great pictures online but the staub doesnt looks as ridgy on the inside as the le creusetbut im gonna go have a look irl donetime this week and know for sure
>>21644710You are entitled to a treat and a pumpkin shaped cast iron looks like a nice option, specially considering they will outlive you (probably), sorry anon, you will have to live with this simple truth. Is there any way to know if these are of good quality or something like that? Maybe they have some disadvantages?
I need an infodump on Le Creuset. Is it just women that buy their overpriced stuff in all sorts of colors as fashion icons and for the "aesthetic"?
>>21644795My boyfriend bought one for me because he liked the colour. I don't think it's exclusive to vaginas, they have nice looking cookware that is generally long lived and high quality.
>>21644795it is goodhowever there are cheap knock offs that are nearly as good and some of it is just richbragging, like who needs a la creuset mug when you can get some nice ceramics that are half the pricesimilar to things like la laboureur - they themselves make cheaper versions of the same garment and fabric its just made in tunisia instead of france - ofc people still buy the french one because its french
i talked myself out of itit was cute but the lid was.annoying to find the right orientation to put it on and it didnt have the stalactites inside the lid that staub is known for
>>21646086If you still crave it later I think they went on clearance at Williams Sonoma early this year, might do so again next year
>>21646424yeah they have white ones a bit cheaper at costco tooim gonna keep my eye on it see if it goes further on sale its a bit steep where it is
>>21644710these cost thousand in my country
>>21644710you could roast your food in a real pumpkin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFYt3-RvgFwpumpkin soup in a pumpkin, has science gone too far?
>>21647912Op is not that based.
>>21648227not as baste as chef john's pumpkin
