Finally companies are delivering health conscious low carb snack foods.
They’re just doing this so food stamp gimmes can still waste their govt dosh on junk food.
>>21773351Wonder what chemical substitute they'll use. For me it's the original OG.
>>21773356Hydrox sounds like the name of a farming pesticide
>>21773351There's no way to make something like Oreo without sugar and carbs. You're only deluding yourself to think you could eat such a thing and it won't contribute to weight gain.It's better just to have a real cookie with sugar and flour now and then when you want one than eat weird chemicals regularly. This is a bad idea and I won't be supporting it.Stop promoting products and start promoting COOKING.Bake some fucking cookies, OP.
These are going to make you shit your pants, calling it now. Screenshot this.
>>21773367>It's better just to have a real cookie with sugar and flour now and then when you want one than eat weird chemicals regularly.t. science hating retard who thinks ozempic is bad because......
>>21773351Oh no, I'm so outraged...
>>21773405I think ozempic is bad for the same reason giving liver transplants to alcoholics is bad. It rewards self destructive behavior and teaches people they can be as reckless as they want and still have a get out of jail free card.
>>21773412ozempic is bad because it creates a hormonal dependence and you can’t go off of it without ballooning up. that’s why pharma companies made it, once someone’s on it they’re customers forever.
>>21773351Sweet, new laxative dropping soon.
>>21773425You know Dead Rising 2 predicted all this
>>21773356sugar is a chemical, dipshit
>>21773356Sucralose is gaining popularity these days over aspartame. The zero sugar Torani syrups and the zero sugar coffee creamers all use sucralose.
>>21773459NTA but a ingredient is not a chemical FYI. If you ever grinded up sugar canes you would know this.
>>21773367>contribute to weight gainsenpai if those nougat bits in charge change the recipe from hyper pallatable sugary bs ingredients i.e 500cal/100g to some bs product that has 70% of the original flavour is less hyperpallatable due to absence of proccessed sugars and has like idk lets say280cal/100g then its just more reasonable to consume those but infact every food you eat contributes to either weight loss or weight gain. Its about the calorie maintenance value for your body and either plus neutral or minus a colorie value that determines what happens to your physical appearance and subsequent health. Im on a cut, lost 22lbs so far no muscle mass lost, all due to filling whole foods and high animal protein, if i were to eat coockies that shit would spike insane sugar withdrawl
>>21773351oreo, huh... you mean those gay FAGGOT cookies... not interested... for me, it's HYDROX...
>>21773465Sucralose is great, I prefer the taste to sugar. But it sucks for baking because it doesn't hold things together like sugar does.It's good in german pancakes though, and greek yogurt.
It begins fellow fats, BAHAHAHAHAH, zero calorie zero sugar gluttony finally begins! YES, YES, THE POWER! THE POWER FEELS SO... INTOXICATING!!!!
>>21773351Xylitol instead of sugar should be enough, don't think it's possible to make it low carb too.
>>21773838>zero calorieOnly the sweetener is zero calorie. It doesn't make the product less unhealthy. Artificial sweeteners also affect people differently. The ones that do usually complain about anal seepage.
>>21773360It is, and that's a good thing. If you inundate your gut with pesticide then you will be immune to pests >>21773481>grinded up sugarThat's a chemical reaction dipshit
>>21773704>>21773356none of you supposed hydroxheads have ever even seen a hydrox cookie, let alone eaten one.hydrox is a fake cookie invented by the oreo company in order to boost oreo's image as a "badass" cookie that steals the work of others and doesn't give a shit
>>21773351I’ll stick to Hydrox.
>>21773351Usually sugar free means it's replaced with stevia. As if it doesn't just make it taste even worse.
>>21773481Spoilers: Everything is chemicals.
Sugar doesn't just sweeten the dough, but it also reacts with baking soda once it's caramelized. So when you bake your own cookies and they become fragrant, that's when you either take them out or turn off the heat.Without sugar you'd have to use something else to cause that reaction.
>>21773356>muh chemicalsGo get your measles vax retard
>>21773367Agreed its really difficult with food. Drinks no. Food yes. Zero calorie Tic Tacs sugar is the first fucking ingredient. They can't do it. Otherwise they would. The fundamental difference between food and drink makes a huge difference with the effectiveness of artifical sweetener. One that apparently would take a scientist to explain.
>>21773351the calorie difference might be just a small reductionas an examplereeses cups mini - 26 grams 130 caloriesreeses cups mini zero sugar - 26 grams 110 caloriesthere are already products like this that exist
One tic tac falls some few decimal amounts of calories under 2.0 so they can complain zero calorie EACH. So you're okay as long as you don't eat a whole pack. Where as something like the three hour breath savers are tablets of aspartame.
didn't they try zero sugar cookies years ago that flopped horribly
Cookies like that already exist and they're around 420-480 calories / 100g.
i cant stand artificial sweeteners. they make me feel like i ingested some sort of medicine. i prefer consuming sugar in moderation like nature intended. never been fat.
>>21773351I could eat no sugar added Oreos, I barely taste them anyways after Dunkin them in coffee I'll likely not notice the difference
>>21775205With cookies, you're better off taking a bite and then taking a swig of your beverage of choice. Or just put some in a bowl, pour some milk or whatever, eat with a fork or spoon. Still better than dunking.
>>21773356Why did they had to name these after bleach and bath cleaning chemicals? Also I imagine these were less sugary anyways.
>>21775570My grandpa would just crumble them up in a bowl, pour half n half over them, and eat them like cereal.
>>21773405The intestinal paralysis and forever diarrhea as side effects.
>>21773351CICOSimple as. People will get even fatter being fooled into thinking this means they can eat more of them. Stay plump fatties.
>>21776237Khyleri?
>>21773496You're going to gain it all back when you start whaling out again, godblessguy. One daily bowl of barf is not "on a cut". Incel
>>21773351This whole thing was "Fat-free" in the 90s. Remember Snackwells? Packed with sugar but no fat. Now things have shifted and sugar is bad but fat is okay. The marketers have won if anyone thinks those cookies aren't gonna have sugar. They can call it what they want, it's going to act like sugar in your body and you're going to eat more than 2 or 3 of them.
>>21776240Good eye. He does disappointed faces better then he does porn.
>>21776237The problem with CICO is morons don't know how to count or they think that their calories reset at midnight or something.
>>21776379I tried in the most simple terms humanly possible. I damn near broke out crayons. Trying to teach my sister that she doesn't need to spend $600 a year on weight watchers with their program and food. The point system is literally just a messy calorie counting method that gets you at a -2500kcal deficient a month. Just enough for you to lose a bit of weight but stuck paying them for years to make significant progress so they can milk you longer. This is fucking rocket surgery. This is literally 4th grade math to count calories and read nutritional information and learning to fucking meal prep/cook for yourself.
>>21776392I did some research a while ago and discovered that weight watchers is based on eating low calorie foods in volume. Not just whole foods like meat and produce, but also low calorie snacks made from super artificial ingredients. Sugar free instant pudding (corn starch+aspartame), overpriced protein snacks bars and snacks, etc.It's a big enough market to assume that Mondelez would've gone in on it hard a long time ago had they already figured out how.>>21776398Erythritol is known to cause anal leakage. Regular Quest bars are sweetened with that shit. The Quest Hero bars, which are gaining popularity, are sweetened with sucralose which doesn't cause it.
Sheesh, okay.
>>21773351>health consciouszero sugar does not mean "health conscious"
>>21776497see>>21773351
>>21774057>>21774836I think she meant in a culinary context
>>21773367This. In stuff like cookie cream, sugar is a main structural component not just a sweetener
>>21776868in every context everything is a chemical.
>>21773465>switch to Nature's Bliss because it's the only actual dairy creamer>get the zero sugar version one day>steviaThat was when I learned I strongly dislike stevia
>>21776237another CICO retard...You should learn what insulin resistance and metabolic differentials are before opening your cockholster, moran.truly.. I have been on /ck for over a decade, and what started out as a fun cook-along, DIY, doritos argument and disaster webms board for intelligent people acting like retards on purpose, or just posting their show-offs, has now become a bottomless cesspoole of Gormless redditards and turd whirlders, who would actually argue the MERITS of this globalist, fake food that ensures hundreds of millions of subscription based, lifetime (((Medical care))) all because you FAT LAZY BASTARDS are too stupid to realize that type 2 diabetes is REVERSIBLE and CURABLE.FUCK this madhouse, I'm fucking leaving and NEVER coming back......See you guys tomorrow.
>>21776409>are sweetened with sucralose which doesn't cause it.no, but it is a known genotoxin that causes cellular cleavage, leaky gut, genocides whole clades of beneficial,(and necessary,) gut flora strains, and also creates a disruption in metabolic regulation, ghrelin processes and also may cause addictive mentation.Pay particular attention to page 2 "Historical safety claims" that have now been confirmed to all have been LIES so as to be able to push this shit onto the market.SucraLOSEhttps://files.catbox.moe/9ou00k.pdf
>>21773360fun fact:hydox is also the name for a dangerous and experimental scuba diving gas mixture comprised of around 95% hydrogen and 5% oxygenhelium-oxygen gas mixtures start to cause problems with the nervous systems at depths exceeding 300 meters (at which the pressure is around 30 atmospheres)but by breathing a hydrogen-oxygen gas mixture, saturation divers have been able to dive as deep as 700 meters during tests
There is nothing wrong with sugar unless you are sedentary and/or fat in which case you have more problems than sugar to figure out.
>>21776943>You should learn what insulin resistance and metabolic differentialslmao shut the fuck up, these don't cause you to be fat, they are what happens when you GET fat.
>>21777196>>21777196LOL, Your total Ignorance on full display>ONLY fat people have these issues>has access to the internet, doesn't do 2 minutes worth of search>I am fully confident in my utter lack of knowledge"“Even if you're thin, inadequate physical activity and unhealthy eating can contribute to insulin resistance, a precursor to Type 2 diabetes,"https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7001558/Guess what artificial sweeteners like sucralose do...It must be hard to type holding a cock in each hand.Now go be a good goy and go back to doomscrolling or watching TeeVee
>>21776943>metabolic differentials30% over or under at the extremes, much less for most people. Stop drinking soda, fattie.
>>21777500Yes FATTIES should stop drinking soda ALL the time.That goes for Zero calorie MONSTERS and every other "energy drink"Talk about metabolic disruption.5 years of those and you'll pretty much guarantee that you'll need the supersize pill case by the time you hit 50.
>>21777513DID you even READ the report?>sucralose 6 acetate is not sucraloseNow it (you) who are being disingenuous.That's EXACTLY what it, and the cited studies say.It's Not a difficult read, nor are the citations hard to find(,you can click on the hypertext links, but if you don't trust that type them in by hand...)There is sucralose 6-acetate BOTH in the little paper packet AND when it metabolises in the gut. NOT that that matters either way, it still causes the same results.Just the fact that the claims they used were easily refutable bullshit should be enough.>Just so you knowKYS faggot.
>>21777531I'm noty mad I just don't think you even read the report and you certainly didn't read any of the cited work.I did, before I posted it here when it first came out.It's not the WIN you think it is.>I'm going to leave the thread nowGood.BTW, >That's EXACTLY what it, and the cited studies say.was referring to your posit(incorrect) that there was no sucralose 6-acetate in the product, NOT that they were the same thing.Come back after having READ the materials presented
>>21776504I accept your concession, thoughever.
>>21777534This nigga is straight up fuming.
>>21773352Does that mean the non-sugar junk foods be more expensive because it'll all be bought with ETF funds?
>>21777802No, dumbass baka retard
>>21777534>I'm noty madlmao
>>21777807Wtf I didn't type baka, I typed baka
>>21777862stop pretending to be me you reddit onions boy
>>21773352I thought the bbf didn't allow that anymore. Or is that for next year?
>>21777016I've been eating tons of sucralose for years and I've had no noticeable symptoms yet. Whereas sugar gave me lots of cavities in my teeth and still makes me feel like shit when I eat it.
>>21773351It will take 10 years before it's discovered that the artificial sweeteners used rinses your gut biome causing you to be unable to pick up micronutrients and end up with all kinds of diseases and cancers, and people will go back to stuffing themselves fat with the sugary alternative.
>>21779408Cute fantasy
>>21779408>10 yearsit is well known currently that artificial sweeteners nuke your insides
>>21779408>>21779420that doesn't seem to be the case though because people like me eat very little real sugar and lots of artificial sweeteners and have no known health issues (aside from whatever causes me to read and post on 4chan)
>>21779438>i'm not dead so death doesn't exist
>>21773351Sugar free means that it's even more goysloppy than the original but since it's "healthier" you pay a bit more without even getting some real sugar but ridoculously inferior chemical substitutes. How do you not know this?
>>21777862>>21777807Get baka, baka!!lolz
>>21774046This. It's a COOKIE. They can't fool people with this "keto friendly" shit when it's bread and cookies. You can do a lot of fuzzy math with net carbs and dietary fiber shit, but at the end of the day it's a substantial number that you can either live with or you can't. Just having that shit in the house if you're watching your intake is asking for trouble. You can't eat what you don't have.
>>21779408>antinutrient schizo ranttake your meds buddy
>>21773351Imagine the liquid shits
I stuff my face with 100-150g of sugar every day. Idk how I don’t have diabetes.
>>21779439>>21779677this poster works for Big Sugar, probably for one of the beet sugar companiesNOBODY WANTS YOUR DISGUSTING BEETS
>>21779906Your body might actually be using efficiently.
