is breakfast a fake extra meal invented by fat people?
>>21885803every calorie I consume gets put to good use
>>21885803Why do videos of people eating disgusting amounts of food do so well on the internet? At least this guy looks like some Non-Union Gronk, but most of the people who do it look like whale monsters.
>>21885809because most people are pigs and they want to watch a skinny or fit person eat as much as they do regularly in order to think its normal and they can lose all the fat and keep their lifestyle at any point
>>21885809Bitches love Randy Santel
>>21885803No
>>21885803No. It literally means to break your fast. The first meal of the day. There is a breakfast industry which has psyoped people into thinking specific foods are to be eaten at early morning points in the day. I admit even though i do understand that i still feel that urge for those flavors in the morning. Eggs, sausage, bacon, oj, coffee, etc. Really all you need to do is eat whatever you like when you feel hungry.
>>21885843For much of history, particularly in the Roman era and Middle Ages, eating in the morning was uncommon, often viewed as sinful (gluttony) or unnecessary, with most people eating their first meal around noon
No, lunch could be the extra meal depending on what you had for breakfast and how many calories you are burning.
>>21885857What did the romans do before cigarettes and coffee?
>>21885891they drank hot water
>>21885835Katina certain does. Don't want to know what weird shit a married couple who are both competitive eaters get up to.>>21885819>skinny or fitGot to wonder what that does to their health because either they purge after eating, in which case they're going to wear out their esophagus, or they digest it all, which has got to be hard on the system after eating normally most of the time.
>>21885803maybe
>>21885857Both Classical Romans and Greeks ate breakfast (as opposed to people in the Middle Ages). Greeks ate pancakes topped with crumbled cheese and honey, while Romans ate depending on their wealth: the rich ate the previous day's dinner leftovers, the less-rich ate bread with fruits and a bit of cheese, while cityniggers hastily ate random shit purchased from a food stall, since they were often forbidden from cooking in their apartments.
>>21885809>Why do videos of people eating disgusting amounts of food do so well on the internet?train wreck phenomenon.
>>21885857>For much of historyand they all died and didn't come back so i shant be paying attention to failed practices.
>>21885969this some marvel reddit revisionism>Romans ate breakfastthe weak and the poor
>>21885857So what? Breakfast is just the first meal. If you have that at noon, it's still breakfast.>b-b-but it's called lunch!And that lunch is your breakfast.
>>21885843it doesn't literally mean break your fast. consider how many people eat after dinner, pre-bed, or midnight snacks. do you think it's actually more common to fast at night than during the day?
Eating copious amounts of calories first thing in the morning is kinda shit. Just makes you tired all day. Light breakfast into a light lunch followed by a 1500 calorie dinner is best.
>>21885857Who told you this
>>21886119Prandium became a thing relatively late in the Empire's runtime. Yes, ientaculum started vanishing as prandium became more common, but prandium wasn't around early on.
>breakfast is for poor peopleanother episode of Euros admitting they're too poor to afford food
>>21885803Not really; there's a few times I've shifted my diet to not having a dinner, and I'm usually starving by morning.
the rise of breakfast in western society coincided with the industrial revolution and mass consumerism, it is a manufactured bastardized "meal" in order to get normoids to buy more stuff
>>21885809Third worlders with smartphones
>>21887510It's also that before the industrial revolution you'd start off slow, typically they drank a lot heavier then too, so breakfast was largely a way to keep workers more sober through the day. But mostly it was, instead of living on a homestead, trudging up at sunrise to do things for the animals, before slowly doing craft labor through the day and possibly going into town at a reasonable hour to trade and collect supplies you were living in a tenement in a city by a port working a 12 hour shift at a mill or port. Instead of starting the day at 6 and slowly waking up, you had to be on the ball, not hungover, and capable of working a giant machine without being gored. As I said heavy drinking was far more normal back then as in the early era of distillation people were pounding spirits like they pounded beer and wine, so between still being slightly intoxicated or hungover it was good to promote a filling meal and possibly before coming into work. It wasn't just some conspiracy to sell bacon, people were getting fucked up at night and then FUCKED up at work because of it.
>>21887559For some reason I always assumed it was Germans
>>21885803I haven't eaten breakfast in maybe 15 years. I've been doing OMAD for maybe 8-9. One big meal is preferable to a few smaller ones, you can't really gain weight as long as you're not mainlining cinnamon rolls, and it's phenomenal to have every molecule of shit expelled in the morning for the rest of the day.
We should eliminate large breakfasts and return to the 19th century "free lunch" where you go full ham only during lunch time where you can eat everything imaginable for free in exchange for paying for a drink at a saloon but only in one sitting.
itt: sedentary dyels
>>21886366Look I'm american, but even I'm not to the point of sleep eating yet.
>>21887570This is what I meant about people being too drunk or hungover to work a machine
