File: 1753988116279141.jpg (1.42 MB, 2992x3277)

1.42 MB JPG

>>21943819
Depends on the fucking fish now doesn't it

>>21943856
which ones would you not eat? )other than the obvious issues like size)

>>21943857

You don't pick out the bones in sardines, do you?

File: 1773464728806357.jpg (1.3 MB, 1521x2686)

1.3 MB JPG

>>21943857
>other than the obvious issues like size
Do there exist other issues? Bones are either edible or not. Very rarely are they in an inbetween area of "small enough to eat but big enough to not want to"

It's not like bones taste bad or have an health issues.

>>21943870
>>21943876
i eat them all if i can but there are bones in some like smallish medium fish that are sort of sketchy because theyre like skinny thin but sort of flexible, where as the canned fish bones are brittle and break when you chew, im only asking this because this nigga here >>21943856 said depends on the fish lol so i want to know what he means

>>21943923
>describes the bone differences between fishes
>this nigga here >>21943856 said depends on the fish
>i want to know what he means

Retard.

naw

>>21943819
Are you a 1940s cartoon cat?

these anons are all retarded its not about size its about brittleness, there are small thin bones that are flexible that will not break upon chewing, dangerous