It should be illegal for Burger King to call these onion rings.
Yea they should come with a warning with how addicting they are.
>>21982757*addictive
>>21982754fat
>>21982754>fat hands
It’s a Google image search result you obnoxious faggots I just want to discuss how much these rings suck.
>>21982754why?they're literally onion rings.
>>21982797>these rings suckwhen?even if they've been under the heat lamp for 2 hours they're still good.
>>21982809They’re all sickly sweet batter and no onion.
>>21982813>sickly sweet batter and no onionwhen?they are filled with onion and the batter is mostly flavorless.
>>21982813Did you even dip them??
>>21982814They're not filling with onion you fat cunt
>>21982819>They're not filling with onionanon, they are filled with onion.i'm sorry you didn't know this.
>>21982824Where is the onion?
>>21982827right there as the filling.
>>21982831That’s not onion.
>>21982836it is.i'm sorry you can't into onion.
>>21982841Hmm… No, I don’t think that’s onion.
>>21982846>I don’t think that’s onionwell it's a good thing we don't base facts off of what you think.
>>21982849I’m basically the smartest person on earth, so everything I think is a fact.
>>21982831>>21982836>>21982827this does make me think thoughwould pulverizing an onion into a sudio paste and then mixing it with a batter then frying it still make an onion ring?
Well, they're shaped like rings and they do contain some onion.
>>21982852It would probably be too wet unless you mixed it with flour or starch or something, which is exactly what BK does.
>>21982831That's not onion
>>21982850your lack of ability to detect onion proves you wrong, again.>>21982852it would.
>>21982857that's onion.
>>21982859I don’t detect onion in the Burger King onion rings because there isn’t any.
>>21982861That’s not onion
>>21982863you don't detect it because you don't know what onion is.>>21982865that's 100% onion.nothing but onion.full onion, no substitutes.
>>21982872Oh. I guess I don’t know what onion is. Ok. You can stop posting in this thread now. For everybody else, why isn’t there any onion?
>>21982879Because it's cheaper to not fill them with onion. People still buy them or they'd change the recipe.
>>21982879>You can stop posting in this thread nowtits or gtfo.
>>21982883breading costs more than onion.it would be cheaper to not bread them.they contain onion.
>>21982884Gayest poster today? Gotta be close
>>21982886They don’t contain onion.
>>21982886Source?
>>21982890they do.>>21982887those aren't tits, femanon.
>>21982893They don’t.
>>21982892cost of breading, cost of onion.look it up.
>>21982895I’m not going to look it up.
>>21982895Citation required.
>>21982852Sounds like the kind of bullshit Cook's Illustrated would pull trying to get the most onion flavor out of their onion rings so they used this one weird trick in the test kitchen that involves caramelizing onions for 45 minutes before blending them into a paste and mixing them with dried onion flakes before mixing it all into the batter, and then dipping whole raw onion rings into the caramelized onion batter to deep fry, and then dipping them in a sour cream and chive sauce.
>>21982896your loss.>>21982898that's your job.burden of proof is on the library called "the internet".go searching.
>>21982909Evidence?
Hey everybody. I just wanted to give a quick update. I checked again and I can confirm, there’s no onion.
>>21982911seealthough i'm glad you're admitting your loss of this insane argument you attempted to have.once we rid the world of people that are shit at trolling we will finally have peace.
>>21982917OK. But where's your proof exactly? I've been scanning and scanning, but I cannot see your proof
>>21982926>your proofit's the internet's proof.
>>21982917That’s a different guy. There’s no onions in the Burger King onion rings.
>>21982930you're still shit at trolling, dnd sucks, anime is for fags, and bk onion rings contain onion.
>>21982931I don’t know about those not food and cooking related things. There’s no onions in Burger King onion rings.
>>21982928I see. You have no proof. Please retract your sweeping statement.
>>21982937Stop talking to him. I’m talking to him and we are busy.
>>21982937>You have no proof.not my job to look up the evidence you need that is available with a google search, but since you're a dolt:>breading - $0.08 an ounce>onion - $0.04 an ounceit would be cheaper for them to contain onion, that's why they do.i'm sorry your palette and eyes are dogshit.
>>21982949That’s fake. You used Photoshop.
>>21982949>paletteOh dear.
>>21982956oh, no! a typo.proofreading internet posts is pointless, anon.please get on the train instead of being afraid of it.
>>21982960Posting fake screenshots with fake ingredients is also pointless.
>>21982962like when these weirdo fucks post anime "girls"?
>>21982963I don’t know anything about that I only know food and cooking. There’s no onions in Burger King onion rings.
>>21982949Citation required
>>21982970It’s fake.
>>21982966if you know food, why don't you know onions?are you claiming onions are not food?
>>21982974There are no onions in Burger King onion rings.
>>21982976>>21982807
>>21982981Burger King is lying and should be sued. There are no onions in Burger King onion rings.
>>21982985>Burger King is lying and should be suedlet me know when you get that check, anon.
>>21982994I said they should be sued not that I’m suing them. Burger King onion rings have no onions in them.
>>21982996>I said they should be sued not that I’m suing themoh, complaint without action.tits or gtfo.
Burger King onion rings have no onions in them.
The autism in this thread is fascinating
>>21983033I wanted a normal thread of hating on these fucking rings but some autie ruined it for me.
>>21983037misplaced hate for something so fucking delicious, anon.learn thy lesson.
>>21983042There’s no onions in Burger King onion rings.
>>21983037Yeah agree, onion ring from BK do suck ass, the batter has a weird taste To be fair I don't any fast food joint has good onion rings
>>21982797>so fat he is afraid to post his own hands
Found OP, hes a bitch and serial BK hater https://youtu.be/njxBjmmBAQQ
>>21983131>I'mmmmmm screeeeeeamingggggg
>>21982754Nuttin wrong with onion paste
>>21983052If he posted his hands, people would criticize it. If he doesn't, people criticize not posting them. Your insults would be better if they weren't so transparently contrarian
>>21983172I could have posted the onion rings wrapped around my dick.
>>21983174The hole is small enough, but you could probably only get 3 on there
>>21983176lmao felted
I've never had them but looked this up and was surprised, indeed it's just a ring of onion flavored batter, not sliced rings of onions that have been battered which is what virtually everyone else calls an onion ring. Kind of baffling, but seems on point given how terrible all their other food is.
>>21983226Fuck off schizo.
>>21983237Google it yourself. I have to stake in this other than curiosity, haven't been to a burger king in at least a decade and don't care for onion rings at the best of timrs but this ingredients list made me curious. >>21982949 the description their own site gives is that their onion rings have a signature uniform shape and size which you obviously don't get with sliced battered onions so it looks like that's indeed the case. Seems weird that they'd do that but their food is disgusting in general so it's really not that shocking.
>>21982754we called them "pre-chewed" onion rings.
>>21982807no they are not. they are ground up onions formed in to rings. they are not very good.
>>21982883>People still buy them or they'd change the recipe.I stopped ordering them shortly after they came out in the late 80's.
>>21983545also known as "baby bird style" 'round these here parts *snaps suspenders*
>>21982974>>21982976
>>21982754I sometimes use crispy onion toppers on pasta and even those are better. This shit? Its like Air Fried dough. Jack in the Box rings are even worse
>>21983131>i ordered buffalo wings and you gave me chicken
>>21983226I used to think Jack in the Box tacos were made from leftover patty meat. We should be so lucky. Imagine my shock to find out its a squirt of soybean paste and a slice of american cheese
>>21983763>Jack in the Box rings are even worseJITB is the OG GOAT.
>>21983783it's ground beef and beans.
>>21983780who was in the wrong?
>still going this prick
BK onion rings are amazing. Every other shitty fast food onion ring sucks dick because the breading sloughs off and you're left with a slimy ring with no breading after taking one bite. BK are genious mixing chunks of onion with the breading so no matter what kind of bite you take you're getting batter and onion and no slimy mess. I wish all onion rings could be so based but sadly we live in a fallen world.
>>21982754Jesus OP when's the last time your skin saw the sun?
>>21982754Here in Hungry Jack's (Australian Burger King) the onion rings they fry are actually made of onion. Sorry you're being served barely edible FDA approved goyslop.
>>21982754>It should be illegal for Burger King to call thesetacos
>>21982754burger king "onion" rings are unironically better than real onion rings.
I had Applebees Onion Rings recently and they use the stringiest wettest limpist part of the onion
MOGGS YOU
>>21983973For me its these BBQ Onion Tanglers. Like a lot of Bar-B-Que places have these things and they slap. And they reheat better than the Onion Bloom
>>21983940If you go to Burger King and buy tacos, you get what you deserve.
>>21983982Yet going to Taco Bell for a pizza is a-ok
>>21983984If you go to Taco Bell and buy a pizza, you get what you deserve.
>>21983987I got the nuggets at taco bell and they were good.
>>21983989nuggets are ubiquitous
>>21983979>they slap Contact the police
>>21983992Okay what about going to a steakhouse and getting a salad?
>>21983993No. I don't want to share
>>21983993Im no bitch chef
>>21983995>going to a steakhouse and getting a salad?That is perfectly normal behavior for a woman.
>>21984000Who the fuck doesnt get the table side Caesar?
>>21984003Every single person with a functioning pair of testicles.
>>21982754that is one really fat hand like how did you even accomplish this it must have taken some effort
>>21984005You sound like the worst person to eat with with, guy.
Red Robin to the rescue.
>>21982754I want a law like Japan has where the fast food restaurant has to make it look like the picture.
>>21983548>no they are not>they are ground up onions formed in to ringspick one.
>>21983226>using ai's answerRetard.
>>21984005Based.
>>21985114Moron
>>21983851>you're left with a slimy ring with no breading after taking one biteyeah an actual onion.
>>21983940would
>>21984994my statement stands.
>>21982754>Has onion>is ringI don't see the problem
>>21985830Nobody asked
>>21983940>>21983982During the brief time they had these, they were pretty great to get like 2 for $2. They tasted deep fried and greasy but were good.
>>21983226Notthat this isn't accurate but I hate we're getting unironic AI citations now
>>21985112>>21985863Looking at the ingredients list and their own website touting that one of the special features of their onion rings is that they're all the same shape and size, what do you think is inaccurate in the description I posted? I've never had a BK onion ring, but it seems pretty clear by all information available that it's not a slice of onion covered in batter, it's a batter made with minced onions formed into the shape of a ring. Are you saying that's not the case? And if so, can you point to any valid information that supports the claim?
