I think they should.
>>21991133they wont this is a gimmicksuper sizing would fuck with there profits they dont want you having a deal aka why mcdonalds costs just as much as a regular burger joint like tgif
>>21991133>it can be paired with a refreshing drink & sideA large fries on the side, please
>they bring it back but it's app-exclusive, and you must have push notifications enabled, and allow the app to access your data at all times, not just when using itwould you?
XXL, same as the old large size.
>>21991147If I wanted 3 large fries worth of fries at one time I'd just order 3 large fries. I don't see when I'd ever do that but that would be how I'd acquire that much potato, instead of poisoning my phone the way I'd be poisoning my body
Here's how it would go if they did:>costs $7>the wagies fill it with less fries than the current large>????>Profit!
>>21991147I do that anyway.
>>21991156Presumably because 3 large fries costs $15 and this thing would cost a few dollars less.
>>21991133McDonald's should bring back 24 hour locations.
>>21991168Look if I was making good decisions with throwaway money I wouldn't be eating fast food to begin with. If you need to fuck with an app and dance like a monkey to their deals so you can afford a greasy meal then that's a good excuse to start changing some things in your life.
>>21991133The niggers atynlocsl mcds still huck me up with a bucket of fries using their big cups
>>21991196they did here cant fucking go inside waffle houses any more apparently though whcih is aids
>>21991216Anon... you're having a stroke...
if it's worth the price, which we know never will be the case
Probably since beef is expensive
>>21991133Just buy 2. That was why they got rid of SS anyway: shrinkflation. Now you can have SS and they make more profit if you just buy 2 larges.
Why not just get two mediums?
>>21991133basket of fries already exists and costs $3.
>>21991136>burger joint like tgifwhat year are you living in, anon?what world?tgif was never a burger joint and it's also out of business.
>>21991133Triple dubs checked. NO. Their food is unhealthful enough even in the smaller portions.
>mcdonalds le bad even tho they offer a balanced menu of macro nutrients at a premium priceSeethe more, poorfags
>>21991333your post is a waste of bits.
>>21991347seething poorfag
>>21991351you sure about that?pretty sure i'm not since only poor people eat mcdonald's.kind of a pre-requisite to eat there is being poor since it's for poor people.
>>21991133Is ordering 2 large fries that hard to do for fatties?
>>21991357fast food isn’t for poor people anymore
>>21991364you understand nothing of economics.it's only for poor people.the middle class that still exists eats at sit downs or at home.the upper class eats at sit downs.the upper crust eats babies.
>>21991371You eat supersized dicks
>>21991379you eat pieces of shit for breakfast?
>>21991133It all depends on how good the fries are. I'll take a mega-portion if they're crispy and good. But it's always a gamble at McDonald's. I'd rather they find a way to make the fries always crispy.
>>21991371lmao what is this the 70's dude its the 25+s poor people have been priced out of fast foodits a middle class+ thing now
>>21991371Your imaginary middle class is the 80-90th percentile.60th percentile and below have 0 income.
>>21991324>this thing that doesn't exist already exists
>>21991133>checkedI am people who want more
>>21991136>super sizing would fuck with there profitsMotherfucker, their fries cost them like 1 cent and you pay them a dollar.
>>21991133I have never received a satisfactory answer why all the fancy MBAs and smart finance people don't understand that even if they skimp on meat in burgers, fries are the cheapest fucking thing to make.They could be selling massive portions of French fries, making the customers happy. This and coke serving sizes should be massive, just so that customers at least feel they're getting their moneys worth But they don't. Why?
>>21991371>>21991357Our bag of dicks President lives on that slop.
>>21992040Since the removed the tallow from the equation, you are lucky to get halfway through a normal order of their fries before they are a cold, sodden, soulless, disgusting experience.
>>21991133
>>21992040>This and coke serving sizes should be massiveThey are, fatty. A large soda at a US McDonald's is like 32 fl oz. Compare that to a can which is 12. Even in Yurop where everything is tiny baby portions it's still as much as 2 cans.
>>21992033RETARD ALERTRETARD ALERTRETARD ALERTRETARD ALERTThey'd make more money off you buying two-three large fries or other items to fill yourself instead of an XXL THE WHOLE POINT IS THEYRE RETARDEDLY GREEDY AKA WHY TGIF A BURGER JOINT IS THE SAME PRICE
>>21992283I THOUGHT THE SAME THING
>>21992377thats pretty funny
>>21991133>for people who want 'more'Fatties aren't people.
>>21992377I hope that's true 10/10 fable
>>21992033Okay and? Do you not know what late stage capitalism is? Everything shrinks while costing more because mega corps do not give a flying f&&k about you as a person you're just a money pit to siphon out of.
>>21991569I see tons of people at sit down restaurants unless you're telling me those are all upper class or rich people.
>>21991204If it forces you to eat less while also allowing you to spend less money how could you possibly wrangle that into a bad thing. You appschizos are just the worst.
A supersize meal would probably cost $30 today.
>>21992925Explain how the fuck you figure that a fastfood app giving you deals for cheaper fast food forces the people who use it to eat less. It is designed to enable them to eat more of it, and spend more of their money at that particular fast food establishment through push notifications reminding them to eat their shitty food and FOMO deals that encourage people to impulse buy.So you're wrong on both fronts. It's designed to train people to spend more of their money at that establishment and eat more of their food. While also scraping personal data.
