How about an animatronic thread on /co/? I’m surprised how advanced these things have gotten. They almost look like real cartoon characters now.
>>150094286Damn, no one likes animatronics here, I guess
>>150094286>How about an animatronic thread on /co/?>>>/g/
>>150094286That is unsettling. Destroy it.
>>150094286Call me William Afton because I would put a child in that animatronic.>>150095817>>150095839I don't know where an animatronic thread would go, if we're talking about Chuck E Cheese type animatronics, maybe it would be /co/. I think they're like cartoon characters
>>150094286That's actually rather nice, it's on a ride?
>>150095839Puppets are /co/Animatronics are puppetsAnimatronics are /co/
>>150096140I think so
>>150094286>I’m surprised how advanced these things have gotten. They almost look like real cartoon characters now.It's been like that for awhile, in my opinion. Seems like your view on animatronics stopped at like Chuck E Cheeses or has been informed entirely be 5 nights at Freddy's games.
>>150097876If you're not a parkfag, how would you know?
>>150098010I haven't been to a park since I was like 8, but I have a general interest in puppets and robots so I just look things up and pay attention to relevant news.
If practical effects for a theme park can be this good, why can't movies do the same?
>>150094286Gazelle shows a lot of legs so this is just censorship.Yes, it's probably to simplify the animatronic and hide whatever, but she has legs for days, dammit.
