>/co/ claims to hate lesbians >never shuts up about themJust admit you like them. They like girls, you like girls. It’s a possible friendship
>>150129230I love Yuri between sexy women.We need more!of it in comics.But less of it with teen girls in cartoons.
>>150129230I like seeing women be gay with each other
>>150129230>friendshipI don't want friendship. I want all the pussy to myself.
>>150129335What about adult women in cartoons sexy adult women
>>150129230But I want what I can't have.
Lesbians don't have sexLesbians have the highest divorce and domestic violence rates.Most lesbians have had intercourse with a man.Gay men > lesbians
>>150129582Do you seethe at every guy with a wife or girlfriend Do you constantly think if every girl who rejects you?
>>150129230The main problem with this kind of girl is to have her hook up with a guy. Like dynamic wise that's probably the most interesting thing you can do.The main problem with the girl boss Mary sue lesbian is that she's boring on her own. Such a character can work if there's like a twist. Having her fuck a girl is boring, her liking a dick would unironically be a more interesting play on the character.
>>150129844Doesn’t /co/ constantly complain about girlboss guy relationships, calling them emasculating
At this point lesbians are as boring and played out as their sex lives.
>>150130026lesbians used to be titillating, now they're just obnoxious
>>150129230friendship to relationship. It's great when you can talk about hot chicks with your gf without her getting angry.
>>150129230I like it when one lesbian tries to convert a straight girl.
>>150130881Kate should try being with a girl. An arrow fired from a bow actually wobbles a lot while it flies instead of being straight.
>>150130881and boring. it's a boring fetish.
>>150129230I like lesbians when they're only lesbians for the arousal of straight male readers and for no other reason at all.
>>150130003The trouble is actually that it's difficult to invest in characters who are intentionally designed to sit outside of anything you would find relatable. The different is interesting, but too different and it becomes irreconcilable.Both the co lesbian and the co femdom-lite are symptoms of this. They're written with stock character designs chosen specifically to be sculpted into a kind of relationship that appeals to aging content creators, and no one else.It's like watching an old Soap Opera. They were made to make their target audience feel like their lives weren't as bad as they could be. That very specific make and model of cope is detectable even by untrained eyes, and though there's no culturally accepted term for it, we can still all slowly accept that rolling our eyes at it and walking away is just as okay as it would be if it were, say, blatant cheesecake or sloppy nostalgia baiting.
>>150129230Lesbian characters in /co/ media are SO badly written that the lesbians that are there foe pure titilation end up feeling far more interesting. Harley Quinn began as a mook for Joker and he exploded into popularity then she was paired with Ivy and the animated episode had undertones. When she ended up in the comics she evolved from Joker abusive victim, to villain, to anti hero and now finally she is lesbian.If it is sexist to always have female characters defined by their relationship to say, a male character, how is it any less sexist that a character like Harley ends up just being glued to another character in another relationship. And the relationship with Ivy is so bad. In the space of a few years they had two similar storylines where Harley wanted to quit crime and an evil plant clone of Poison Ivy attacked because Ivy subconsciously didn't want to quit that lifestyle.Is there a name for this trope when writers purposefully want to desperately avoid something they deem problematic but end up writing the same, similar or other tropes into a series? In trying to avoid Harley being an abuse victim of the Joker she ended up defined purely by another relationship where she ended up as kind of an abuse victim too.
>>150130003Because in those cases they don't actual write the male character as a normal person and instead use it to facility more EPIC GIRL BOSSING. When I say a girl like this hooking up with a guy is probably one of the only ways to make this interesting, I don't mean a none character who exists just to go "wow Girl Boss your so cool and brave and always right please never be challenged with your ideas or viewpoints", I mean like an actual guy whose existence would allow us to play with the idea of this kind of character.A proper relationship involves venerability and a give and take between two people, as a result it can provide a platform to deconstruct this kind of character. Putting someone whose perfect, or at least one who is treated as such due to a lack of anything revolving around her being challenged, into a normal relationship with a normal person written by someone who wasn't a complete hack could write some interesting stuff.
>>150129230First of all1. We only like the hot ones2. They should never remain as lesbians 3. A male join them so he has his haremSecond1. Dykes are overrated 2. Go back to /u/ yuritroon
>>150129836No, because if they actually reciprocated, I would immediately lose interest. My life pretty much revolves around chasing something that I'll never be able to catch, because my standards are deliberately impossible to reach. It's not my fault that I intentionally refuse to ever be satisfied. It's reality's fault for not trying harder to satisfy me.
>>150129230it's okay if the women are hot
>>150129230/co/ loves to hate and will fill threads complaining about stuff they hate. But I actually love lesbians. I think cute and hot girls falling in love and being sexy together is great.
/co/ likes lesbians when the male romance is utterly dogshit and the actual lesbian ship has more fun chemistry and appeali.e. Ruby Gillman
