[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: wbpa-4chan.jpg (617 KB, 2000x1125)
617 KB
617 KB JPG
How come their animated movies have never been as popular as Disney's?
>>
Iron Giant was such a fluke
>>
Probably because they started like 60 years late
Imagine if they started in the 40s where things would be
>>
>>150129759
What's weird is that it didn't even have to be, WB just did a fucking shit job promoting it so it didn't make its money back until television broadcasts made it popular to rent DVDs of it years later. I heard that the recent rescreening actually made more money than its original theatrical release.
>>
This could've been better
>>
>>150129483
The vast majority of people are retards with shitty taste in everything.

Appealing to the lowest common denominator and making something of quality are mutually exclusive
>>
People prefer soft/family-friendly
>>
File: 1749245337753200.jpg (108 KB, 500x744)
108 KB
108 KB JPG
>90 million domestically

The only WB animation movie from the 90s that did well on theaters
>>
>>150129483
They spent so much time solely producing shorts that making an animated movie probably felt risky. Their animated movies are either Looney Tunes compilations, mediocre movies, or good ones that flopped because they weren't promoted properly.
>>
It's a shame how it was overshadowed by other movies on November 2003
>>
>>150129998
One of the movies that overshadowed it was also a WB movie (The Matrix Revolutions)
>>
>>150129881
what about the sequel?
>>
>>150130092
70 million
>>
>>150129483
because they make shit movies
>>
Most of their canon is nothing special and their good to great movies (Iron Giant) have some of the worst marketing in the planet.
>>
>>150129813

>He's one cell of a guy

that dosn't make any sense
>>
>>150132993
>He's one cell (basic structural and functional unit of all forms of life)
>of a guy (pictured in the background)
>Play on "he's one HELL of a guy"
Maybe you're some sort of microbiologist and this is just layman's terms? Or perhaps some sort of germanoid who cannot into wordplay?
>>
They also lack of Studio 'style',outside Looney tunes or DC titles they mostly unrecognisable as WB product.
>>
>>150129797
WB Animation had Looney Tunes in the 40s and 50s - Yes, they should have considered doing full length feature animation but you have to remember that no other studio - besides Walt's was doing this. And for decades, no other studio seriously considered it, until Pixar.
>>
They don't make enough of them. They need to start putting out 2-3 movies EVERY year like Disney and Universal do. And not stop even if several of them bomb in a row. That's the only way they can increase their market share
>>
WB has no faith in any IP they own that isn't capeslop. They wanted to turn The Iron Giant into an inane toy commercial and when Brad Bird refused, they just refused to market the film on release.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.