Normal words but a family!
Who are these even made for?
>>150160881Millennials and Californians
>>150160833Good luck trying to find anybody who would even bother watching this piece of steaming shit of a show.
>>150160881me
>>150160881the creators
>>150162462This 100%. The ugly fat balding one is Ralph's self insert.
>>150160881People tired of Bart Simpson being 10 years old for the last forty years
>>150163879was this made with fucking AI something about that guys bike looks extremely off
>>150160833>>150160881It was really good. It's more normie sitcom than Bojack and it has jewish culture practices as big events in the series, but it works because a lot of what you're watching is a family that separates through the years and rarely comes back together. Like weddings, Christmas, funerals, and Jewish holidays, what if that's all you have connecting yourself to your family? The only reason you meet still?
>>150163909People can do shitty and cheap all by themselves. It has a wonky over simplified style.
>>150163973ah fair enough, it is just 1 frame after all
>>150163956So the further neurotic worries of a rich New Yorker. Now with 50% more daddy and mommy issues from the creator and associated writers.I watched one of the trailers and literally every joke was something that I had already seen in previous sitcoms.
I personally loved Long Story Short the more I watched, but I don't see it pulling in nearly as many people as Talking Animals. They tried giving it that extra push with the variety of color palettes and all, but the show is still too mundane for most audiences.
>>150164026It's just boring middle class drama. It's funny, it's good, but it's for millennials in their 30s and their families. It makes a point to explain how a lot of it is neurosis and stupidity as well as make some characters genuinely borderline personality disorders.
>>150164413This. It's like I can't recommend it to the Bojack audience because there isn't that same feeling, humor, originality. The stakes are much lower, the characters are less interesting. The format is interesting, you're never sure what year you're about to start off and then jump to and there's a lot to say about the reasoning. Sometimes it's obvious but it hardly beats you over the head when it's less obvious. It uses time as a device to not just drive narrative, but show distance and connection.
>>150164413Liked it but you can remove 75% of it without losing anything
>>150164484That's why it's important to stress that it's a normie sitcom. Sure, it tells a story and it feels complete in it's first season, but it's just a series of situations with a light, low stakes plot that doesn't necessitate much for you to understand, it's just characters through time.
>>150164467>The stakes are much lower Correct >the characters are less interesting I disagree. I was invested in each character's subplot. I wanna see Avi's crashout after the divorce, or Yoshi's time on the farm, or Naomi & Elliott's years as young parents. A cartoon being more mundane shouldn't make it an immediate turn-off
>>150164587>A cartoon being more mundane shouldn't make it an immediate turn-offIt shouldn't be, but for many it is, especially if their expectations are set by Bojack. A horse guy being a washed up 90s TV star coping poorly with being a shitty person on a wacky downward spiral that has him stealing the D from the Hollywood sign with a bunch of wacky friends makes for a more "cartoony" kind of fun that translates easier in American animation. This gets wacky, but it's not the same.
>>150161752Jokes on you I've already tried searching
>>150163879This was the best episode by far, might only tune in for another season if there's more Rachel
