For those who say it didn't gross more than Man of Steel or Batman vs Superman
>>150283251I meanit plainly didn't and the relatively lower costs and higher return on investment doesn't necessarily help it to feel more successful to the people deciding how much investment the sequels get
>>150283251$125 MILLONES!!!
>>150283251Meanwhile the original 1978 movie made 300 million with a budget of 50.Meaning it made more raw dollars in profit than any subsequent film even without accounting for inflation.Counting for inflation, Superman 78 made well over a billion dollars
>>150283420the lesson here isn't "make a better superman movie" it's that you need something new and exciting to get people into the theaters. The early marvel movies were raking in billions too. "make the movie like the comic" was a new thing then.
>>150283251Oh wow a Spanish-language Twitter collage, it doesn't get more official than that
>>150283251>No sources>Spic language Sure thing anon.
>>150287238>bumping a thread that was on page 9 or 10 to post that
Snyderjeets always love to claim Man of Steel did more at the box office but never bring up how its marketing budget was basically twice as expensive as the new film's budget and how it made such less money despite being in the middle of the capeshit film craze. the new film did comparable numbers during a fatigue era, spent less on marketing and raked in more money from sponsorships and digital but nooooo don't mention all that saar it's not relevant saar
>>150287260And I'm doing it again. Deal with it anon
>>150283251I don't know what these spic words mean.
>>150287461Says the gunnspic
>>150288612>non-argument>copes about me being a Gunnbotas expected from a Snyder shill, your precious universe is never coming back. the Snyderverse is dead. bury it.
>>150289213>Takes just 1 word to make him seetheHeh, this is gonna be a fun run under Gunn's management.
>>150288612why do spics fellate gunn so incessantly? what is the appeal?
