Does anyone prefer New Looney Tunes (formerly Wabbit) over the Looney Tunes Cartoons of the 2020s?
>>150343239New Looney Tunes: better writingLooney Tunes Cartoons: better animation
>>150343239These designs reek of flash animation.
>>150343239NLT had worse art but the writing was decent. LTC had awful writing.
>>150343239this show had a shit ton of new character and nobody remembers them except for the spy fox
>>150343239EW WHY DOES PORKY LOOK LIKE THAT??
>>150343239It's impossible for me to tell whether Wabbit has good writing or not because everything about it is so distractingly off-putting
The artstyle is fucking awful. Why didnt they do the New Looney Tunes Show art style again?
>>150343883they wanted this show to be everything that LTS wasn't because the latter was still largely hated at the time
>>150343637It is interesting how hard they went in on the just bugs and barely anybody else angle to the point of necessitating an entire new cast for him to interact with.Especially given the hard rebound into the opposite direction with the rebrand.
>>150343799that's porky...?
>>150343799Well he was fatter back in the day, so it's a retro throwback. That's why Gabby is also there.
>>150343239No
>>150343239Jeff Bergman was the better Bugs than Bauza.
>>150343279Was it good?
>>150343239No, kys.
Looney Tunes Show ushered in an entire generation of insufferable "fans" unable to stomach a version of the series without their Seinfeld sitcom shit. Any Looney Tunes cartoon made from that point on simply won't be good enough for them.
>>150350510That's just zoomers anon, most of these haven't even watched Duck Dodgers 2003, nor do they know who Joe Alaskey is.
We cannot be at the point where people are arguing New Looney Tunes is good
>>150351774What do you mean at the point
