[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Face.png (220 KB, 298x361)
220 KB
220 KB PNG
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dMZI0FkYLEs
Why the fuck are there orphans in this shit now? Why couldn’t it just be about the animals getting revenge like in the book? Is it because villains committing animal cruelty is "politically incorrect"? Why can’t any animated film these days actually be unique and not be about goddamn children? I’m gonna bet you that the Twits won’t die in this like they did in the book and they’ll instead be redeemed in some safe sappy ass way.
>>
>>150708249
its the little prince all over again
>>
They're gonna milk his work just like Dr. Seuss.
>>
modern england without indians would be unrealistic
>>
>>150708749
And Terry Pratchett.
>>
>>150708449
The book was already about a kid



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.