[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: badguysnetflix.png (894 KB, 1130x625)
894 KB
894 KB PNG
After numerous leaks (casting calls and animatics), DreamWorks announced officially the Bad Guys TV Series which will be on Netflix. P.D: No Diane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHfnMaucnNw
>>
>>150737096
>No Diane
>Shitty TV quality animation
>Devaluing the brand with shitty sequels in-between theatrical big budget movies
This is why Bad Guys 2 and this will flop, are we back in an era where we're milking movies into TV spinoff? The only thing that should be milked is Diane, by me.
>>
File: well this sucks.png (397 KB, 625x497)
397 KB
397 KB PNG
>>150737096
>no diane
>uses the same shitty artstyle as the holiday specials
>>
>>150737096
>Let’s not put in your second most popular character at all despite a large portion of the first two films revolving around the character and the character’s story arc which soon led her to joining the Bad Guys full time
Seriously what are they thinking
>>
>>150737096
The fans deserve this
>>
>>150737096
Wow this looks way worse then the movie
>>
>>150737497
That’s always been a given with these movie-to-show things, but the Bad Guys ones have been SHOCKINGLY ass
And no Diane just seals the deal for DOA
>>
>>150737096
>TV series based on critically successful franchise
>it's a prequel
>character development reversed
>missing newer beloved characters
Why do they always do this shit? Surely they could've done a series between 1 and 2 instead? There's plenty of stories that could've been told about them trying to go good rather than them still being bad.
>>
>>150737742
>but the Bad Guys ones have been SHOCKINGLY ass
which is only compounded by the fact that the animation in the movies is absolutely stellar.
good lord this is unwatchable
>>
>>150737096
The style just can't be pulled off with TV budget
They should've made it 2D
>>
>>150737096
Hope it's not cheap
>>
Who’s gonna tell him >>150740536
>>
its pry gonna be super cheap but as long as mr.shark or mr.snake swallow someone whole then all will be forgiven

if mr.wolf swallows someone whole i will go to every review site and rate it 5 stars
>>
>>150737181
Either they don't know how popular she is or they're scared of what kind of attention she brings. They hardly showed her in the sequel's trailers.
>>
>>150737096
Literally no one asked for this.
>>
>>150737173
Same, King Julien.

Same...
>>
>>150737096
The animation is still very cheap just like the holiday specials, but the rendering looks a little higher quality with better lighting. It looks a bit better but they're clearly still cheaping out when it comes to the actual animation because it's basically keyposes only.

What will save the show is if they sprinkle a bit of Crimson Paw / Diane in it here and there but she wasn't in either of the holiday specials so I am quite dubious that she'll be in the series. I'll still give it a watch though just to be fair and because I love the movies.
>>
File: file.png (2.54 MB, 1478x1080)
2.54 MB
2.54 MB PNG
Are Webs and Tiffany going to be the only girls in the show? I mean webs is cute but if Diane and / or Kitty aren't in the show at all, it will all be on Webs to stop dad from changing the channel and those are some big shoes to fill.
>>
>>150743828
They should show really Tiffany. The one from the books
>>
>>150737096
I don't understand how it can look as bad as it does when they started working on it after the first movie. This was in production the the entire time the second movie was being made and yet it looks do much worse for how much time they had to polish it
>>
>No Diane
Why live?
>>
>>150741508
its the latter. We all know its the latter. Can't have boys looking at pretty furry girl and having no no thoughts.
then they might grow up and be straight, furry, but straight.
>>
>>150737096

Why is there entire gimmic just

>remember that movie you like
>here's a shitty version of it with worse animation and cheap VAs

Disney at least tries to have the og cast in their movie tie-in cartoons
>>
>>150737155
>>150737173
>>150744829

This only confirms that you only watch these movies for her
>>
File: Megamind Rules!.jpg (68 KB, 736x595)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
>>150737096
The animation genuinely looks worse than Megamind Rules. That show's look was just typical cheap 3D you see in most other 3D cartoons, people who were disgusted just don't see those shows nowadays. But this animation feels unfinished, the characters shift from poses so fast there's no inbetweens or anything. It's like zoomer's first animation test in Blender, but I don't even think that applies anymore with the cool shit people do nowadays just for the meme.
>>
>>150741508
I believe they were not aware how liked she would be and made this before in the assumption audiences (especially kids) would only care for the core group
Remember they did not make this in just the last year, this has been in production since at least 2021. They would not have too time to adjust to realizing Diane was actually popular the way the second film could, especially since this is a request before they even met



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.