Why are fanartists like this?
>>151005270Go back to Shitter
What's wrong with both?
>>151005270Tall sticc envy
>>151005270Both are fun to draw....but one does tend to get more Likes.
>>151005270horny
>>151005270This is for signalling you're a good harmless boy that feminists should approve of - doesn't fit on 4chan
>>151005270This post pops up every 4-6 monthsLaziest form of engagement bait these days
It irks me because flat chest is hotter and big boobs are way overrated.
>>151005360liking flat chests makes you a pedo sorry you had to find out this way
>>151005270Twitter slop thread
>>151005399Why is Angelica the wife of a Dandy's World character?
>draw on-model>people accuse you of being a pedophile
>>151005382Shut up
>>151006699You could draw a character like a fertility goddess and they'd STILL call you a pedo because uhh....she doesn't look like a 50 year old hag, I guess.
>>151005270I prefer to turn the flat chested girl into a loli and have her self cest with the fanart version of herself
>>151005270Many such cases
>>151005270
>>151005270Do they even respect and love the characters though?
>>151005399Not directing this at (You) specifically, anon. But how is giving a flat chested character breasts considered "sexualization"? Just because a character has breasts doesn't automatically mean SEX. There are millions of women on this planet at this very moment who have breasts and not all of them are either sexy or have any sex appeal.
>>151005399I thought this kid was 12 judging from the "art" fucking oof.
Both are fine. It's not as if the character on the right objectively sexualizes the left one. That's more so on the viewer's feelings.
>>151009937>>151009970you think the artists give them titties for storytelling purposes?
>>151005270If you've never felt aroused by something you drew yourself, you'll never understand.
>>151009797Absolutely if they do that
>>151005382A true gigachad laughs while enjoying flat chest
>>151010309Okay, true, but that's an unknown for us to know if the addition was for sexualization. In an ideal society, we wouldn't view all people with a reduction to appeal and/or body viewpoint thinking "Ooooh, sexy." Personally, I'm not looking at a character with breasts thinking that. Although, I can understand how the addition could be for the purpose of sexual appeal. Objectification is a really nuanced topic. I'm reading a book on the topic, coincidently...
>>151007180this. look at how fags act with anime charactersdoesn't matter if she has big boobs or not, they'll still call you a pedo for liking some MHA chick or a big boob midget. They are fishing for a way to denigrate you
>>151005270Oh hey, it's every Hornet fanart ever made.
>>151010584Fanart means I can do what I want. We don't have to be constrained by the limitations of the source material.
>>151005270Would
Does /co/ have its own equivalent of Cynthia from Pokemon? A character who's canonically pretty flat but is almost always drawn as a titty monster?
>>151010309You didn't know that plot was stored in the tits?
>>151005270Its a shame how so called ''fanartists would do this without the accurate on-model character design.
>>151005270>Why are fanartists like this?1. That character might have been aged up by that fanartist (assuming that character was underage)2. Something something artistic license3. Their inner coomer wanted to draw that character with bigger tits4. Some think it's fun to draw characters with bigger tits5. Big tit fetish 6. Pic related
>>151008784>>151009970>>151010337>>151014166/thread
>Not making fanart of the character morbidly obeseNGMI
>>151012309cynthia tittymonster fanart is peanuts in comparison to hex maniac
>>151014938>Uses male character >Doesn't use female character Lame
>>151005347>if you have this opinion that was common in the right 15 years ago YOU MUST BE A WOKE TRANNY WHO WANTS STRAIGHT MALE GENOCIDE AUUUUGHFuck off back to /v/
>>151009937We know removing breasts is de-sexualizing a character, can't think of a character that got more sexy with a flatter chest on it's own, so giving them breasts is the opposite.
>>151005270They should kiss
>>151005399>we should sexualize flat chested characters just keep them flat.I very much agree with this sentiment.
What's wrong with it? Embellishment is a perfectly normal thing for a fan to do.
>>151015766Fanart/porn is almost always better when the characters are on model. Unless the original art style is hideous.If I'm gonna fap to a character I want them to look like the character, not a giant-breasted, bimbofied version. Not saying that all embellishment is the same, just using hyperbole to demonstrate my point.
>>151015900All comes down to the style/interpretation in question at the end of the day. There are far too many cases in fanart where an artist's interpretation does a character way more justice, ESPECIALLY when it comes to lewd fanart. The original style doesn't necessarily have to be hideous for that to be the case. Even then it's purely subjective between viewers in the end
>>151016088>There are far too many cases in fanart where an artist's interpretation does a character way more justice, ESPECIALLY when it comes to lewd fanart.Nah, it bugs me when much of the art for characters like Gaz or Mandy is just "they're a titcow now." There is more to hotness that just big titties.
>>151016152>"they're a titcow now." There is more to hotness that just big titties.Nothing inherently wrong with that stance if that's your opinion, but it's still purely subjective. The fan interpretations wouldn't be so popular if big boobs weren't enough for a lot of people, even if it's not for everyone. To be fair, no one interpretation is for everyone
Twitter has made it to where liking petite characters and proportions makes you a pedophile To the point where IRL women are called children because they're short and not drawn like twitter thigger slop
>>151005270The least Hispanic cartoon fanart.png
>>151015426Otome franchise, ya sausage.
>>151016526Yes anon we know you're a gay brown and browns are flat.
>>151005270Because you're a faggotOnly homoids and pedos want flat chests but then I repeat myself
>>151006699I can live with that
