How does the Jungle Girl character type still exist in 2025?
>>151011008I don’t understand the question
>>151011008Croog
>>151011008only by a niche group of people, but most of them are deviantauatists.>>151012193We're desperate for this stuff that we don't really categorize a difference between jungle/cave-core. personally, I prefer buff Cave-Babes.
Because Dynamite is kept alive by Boomers and Boomers at heart with their own weird psuedo nostalgia for a time before them. They're the male-equivalent of chubby white women who are into Vintage pin up culture and Betty Page.>>151012558To be fair the difference is typically negligible to the point half the Jungle-Core stuff will get prehistoric animals anyways since the allure is purely Deepest Darkest Jungle where anything can happen. The point is always a pulpy savage place.
>>151011008The Jungle Girl type has a B I G boisterous fan base. I would know I'm a ENORMOUS fan of the genre.
>>151011008Despite monumental worldwide efforts to rectify the situation, some males still are straight.
>>151011008Problem?
>>151011008Why does she look like a bimbo?
>>151011008>My worldview is correct, now can things contradict it? I can't reevaluate my ideas! Why are you this way
>>151011008>How does the Jungle Girl character type still exist in 2025?This is all the proof you need to realize how mind broken some people were by all that social bullshit that happened in America during the 2010's. God bless Dynamite for releasing this in a trifling, post-Me Too/"male gaze" era.
>>151011008Because there is still an audience who wants to coom to big boob blondes in leopard print bikinis.
>>151011008But theres no jungle girl comics in 2025
Marvel should make a new Shanna series drawn by Frank Cho to outrage all the asexual zoomers triggered by scantily clad females.
>>151015057need him back
>>151011008We have that type of characters.
>>151015839Livin the dream