Woah momma
>>151041407>entire series is just post giantess impregnation I'm not complaining, but Satina really needs to be more evil for the concept to work as a cartoon. She's too cute for it to be funny, where the joke should be that Dave doesn't even have to raise her and Satina is already interested in men older than Dave. just my two sense
>>151041407Centinel303/tana needs to draw more verosika pornAnd were never getting satina episode 2 at this rate
>>151041407How tall is she?
>>151041407safe horny show to screw up adolescents and/or keep manchildren screwed up
>>151041407>make fun concept>get what i feel like is a decent following, several million views on YT, make an animation studio>proceed to not do anything, like the beelzebub concept he borrowed from the 4chan anon with his permission or lucia's sisters and instead take a C-class role in animating for smiling friendsHannah, you androgynous weirdo, i know you lurk these threads.I need more satina, stat
>>151041407Her voice is hot.
>>151041762Kill yourself prudenigger
>>151041638she has Gamagori scaling, in that she's always the largest thing in the room
>>151042040Even worse, the next episode was meant to officially introduce the entire ensemble of demon hotties they'd been teasing for years, with them even making an official statement that it'd give rule 34 artists a lot to work with. And now it's basically dead.
>>151041407>Hey Dave, wanna fly?>Uh... how?>Just step across my tail and put your your foot on by other cheek.>... 'Kay, now what?>Hold on, it needs to build up just a little more...
>>151042040>works for Zach>Zach is opening an indie animation studioSatina bros things are looking up
>>151043521Oh BOY!
>>151041407>Episode 2 will never be released since Hannah now works on Smiling Friends
>>151043407Not a prude, rather viewers who are sexually undeveloped will grow up to have a distorted image of a partner to seek if they latch onto these kind of abstracted designs. You find many people online who are disturbed by how biological women in real life appear, and it is the fault of their conditioning by this kind of safe media which inculcating a soft, infantalized ideal of sexuality. Escapism is only pleasant when you're already well versed in reality, otherwise the two get confused and both become a nightmare of lack of fulfilment.
>>151044688That's nice, which botfarm taught you that?
Satina should be fucking men already she's a demon
>>151044889She's only half a demon, man.The other half is jewish.
>>151044688>You find many people online who are disturbed by how biological women in real life appearThey are pretty gross, though.
>>151044910even more of a reason.On the serious note I hate how any animation happening with demons and hell doesn't actually show anything shocking or fucked up. It's just Steven Universe hugfest but in hell. Nobody is doing things that one would conflate with evil like rape and shit. They only go for killing I guess but that's the bottom of the barrel.
>>151044923So is everyone, compared to ideals engrained by falsified imagery. Pornography sets impossibly high physical standards for teenagers before even seeing an average woman naked. Safe horny cartooning is more insidious, as it's "just a little naughty", and therefore suited to adolescents who would otherwise be disturbed by the same degree of sexuality if presented realistically. The comfort this gives ultimately stunts psychosexual development. Obviously, it's not an issue for anyone who's already well assimilated, but this generalization and abstraction of idealized sexual shapes is why there are many teens who think they're gay when they're not in reality, only for incredibly simplified furries on Twitter or whatever.
>>151042040>>151043484>>151043521It's sad, but I'd rather it die because the artists have better opportunities than because they gave up on their dreams. I'd quit my indie stuff to work on Smiling Friends.
>>151044688>>151045097>"im Not a prude">goes on a tumblr puritan diatribe about "muh unrealistic expectations" and kevetching about pornAgain, kill yourself
>>151044972Go reread Jack again then faggot
>>151043484Episode 2 cannoy happen beacuse Hannah now works on Smiling Friends
>>151045907I meant current popular animation
>>151045770I'm more lamenting that from the art posted here, you're depriving yourselves of a more refined taste. Basic silhouettes designed to entrench a crude vestigial image of sexual desire, exaggerated to extremes, as the dopamine lessens with each hit.>>151045533>>151044910
I kinda feel like Hannah working on another show helps the odds of her going back to Satina successfully later, provided she doesn’t lose interest over time
>>151045953They're brown "people" anon, you cannot expect them to appreciate healthy bodies. That's why 80% of 4chan is ass > boobs "people". They're stuck in their primal stages staring at asses and enjoying assholes like they are.
>>151046015Nothing necessarily wrong with enjoying exaggerated drawn pornography (assuming one has a good grip on reality), but safe horny style is a way to hijack weak-willed minds with an undercurrent of primitive hedonic imagery. The animators possibly don't even know this is what they're doing, as they've already numbed themselves to the feed-based onslaught of their favorite artists' cleavage/ass of the day. It's just everyday cartooning to them. I was fortunate enough to stumble across edgy pornographic flashes as a child, back when the Internet was fairly new and parents didn't know any better. It clearly set the line between cartoons stimulating mentally and stimulating physically (expressed through a cognitively dissonant thrill, as I wasn't yet able to consciously process what I saw). The average Twitter artist's product, whose simple cartoon heads appear on gradually more voluptuous bodies as they goon more and get more gooner followers, has blurred this line.
>>151045923I spoke more harshly than I meant and you’re not wrong for wanting edgy HellMy point is more that you’re missing the basic idea of the comedy of Hell/demons being chill and complaining that comedic shows are going with that instead of making Agony
>>151044910Hey, why'd my reply to this get deleted but >>151043498 (Also me) got to stay up?
>>151046461Stop being such a massive prudefaggot and fuck off back to twitter where you belong you twitter puritan
who let the coupla queers in?
>>151047497You aren't reading what I've typed if you're still calling me prudefaggot.
>>151047533>This shit is a one time thingSooo...mistakes into miracles?
>>151041407>furry porn outside /b/>jannies are fine since it's safe horny mommydom
>>151048855I don't see any fur
>>151045953>>151046461What level of autism even is this?>>151046015>ass vs. boob faggotry>muh brown peoplePlease kill yourself.
>>151041638Sex with Satina
>>151048855Demon ladies aren't furry anon. At least so long as they aren't the goat-headedones.
>>151050696>What level of autism even is this?What do you think? I'm attempting discussion, but people here are too damn lazy to dissect this phenomenon which I find fascinating.And I don't know what >>151046015is talking about.
>>151051162>this phenomenon which I find fascinatingThere's no phenomenon. People getting off to simple shapes and colors isn't stunting anyone's development. You sound like you're projecting your bullshit worldview insanely hard.
>>151048799>>151051162m8 you're being the prude equivalent of "hiding behind 7 layers of irony" but instead of irony it's discussion.
>>151051205I don't believe people who can't get off without accompanying inflation porn, or similar fixations on large simple shapes, have a developed sexuality or that it wasn't the consequence of finding refuge in art that caters to this undeveloped primitive sexual symbol halting progression.>>151051237Prude how? I'm all for well developed sexuality, which can include all these things, but I see a regression in art quality by appealing to these primeval images that need to be brought into focus by society.
>>151051366>I don't believe people who can't get off without accompanying inflation porn, or similar fixations on large simple shapes, have a developed sexualityIs... is your only justification for this that you don't personally like it???>or that it wasn't the consequence of finding refuge in art that caters to this undeveloped primitive sexual symbol halting progressionNo, anon, I don't think most people start their sexual journey with inflation porn... Good job...?
>>151051366>Prude how?Because you're already approaching things with the conclusion that there must be a negative attribute to them. If you approach human sexuality through the lens of "this kind of sexuality is reductive" you're already acting as a prude in some way. The only parts of human sexuality that should be looked upon negatively from the outset are those that intrinsically cause harm to a party in said act, like rape. Some dude fapping to shitty inflation porn isn't anywhere near the equivalent to that, it's just some dude getting his rocks off to something weird.
>>151051463The inflation porn is just an obvious example based on anon's description of "getting off to simple shapes" and also what I'm getting at, but it is a deviation from the "safe horny" style which I'm mostly curious about, namely its rampant success, with many artists and imitators abound favoring it over other styles. It's invariably popular. Cartoons featuring a generalized abstract female figure with thick outlines, large simple eyes with eyelashes outperform art that experiments more with perspective, detail and emphasizing individual traits. I believe this to be a combination of its SFW accessibility being unchallenging to young minds, its appeal to the ubiquitous primeval round image deeply rooted in our collective mind, and our evolved desire to seek bright colors (like in fruit).>>151051570The negative attribute is only that there are some whose sexuality is misguided early on by this art style, as its maximal appeal is targeted towards the most primitive images and gets around censorship, not that I advocate for it. I don't even mean "primitive" in a patronizing way (like how "degenerate" or "retard" is used today), rather just at its most basic form from which I hope the chronically online can push beyond for the sake of survival of the species.
>>151051757Forgot to add picrel. BTW a lot of these artists do the same when drawing male characters too, so entrenched is the Venus figure.
>>151051757>Cartoons featuring a generalized abstract female figure with thick outlines, large simple eyes with eyelashes outperform art that experiments more with perspective, detail and emphasizing individual traits. I believe this to be a combination of its SFW accessibility being unchallenging to young minds, its appeal to the ubiquitous primeval round image deeply rooted in our collective mind, and our evolved desire to seek bright colors (like in fruit).Yeah, you're autistic. Nobody thinks about porn this way.>there are some whose sexuality is misguided early on by this art style, as its maximal appeal is targeted towards the most primitive images and gets around censorshipWhen have you literally ever seen an example of this? I don't understand.
>>151051757...You know man, I was typing up a response to this, but fuck it. This is way too autistic for me and derailing a thread that'd nominally be about people wanting to bang the hot demon MILF. I'm out.
>>151051842Imagine throwing this thing at someone. It must hurt like hell.
>>151051890>Nobody thinks about porn this way.Nobody thought about dreams the way Freud did, and his theories have shaped film and advertising long after mainstream science had discredited them.>When have you literally ever seen an example of this?Chronically online teens who are already depressed by their twenties, wondering why the world isn't up to their impossibly abstracted ideals curated by online algorithms? They think they're gay or trans when enough of >>151051842comes their way (the male version of the safe horny style, as its more palatable than IRL gay porn which is a much more concrete litmus test).
Does she have a model sheet or a turnaround? I need it for reasons
>>151052082>Freud's theories have shaped film and advertising long after mainstream science had discredited themYeah, because most people know absolutely nothing about psychology.>Chronically online teens who are already depressed by their twentiesAnd you think the spread of mental illness... is entirely to do... with softcore porn drawings.Pop psych is a drug, anon. Please don't abuse it.
>>151044910
>>151052200>most people know absolutely nothing about psychology.Yes and I'm proposing a way to think about art. >And you think the spread of mental illness... is entirely to do... with softcore porn drawings.If they let cartoons shape their sexuality at too impressionable an age. Illness is maybe to strong of a term, but it is "viral" in the sense of how furries are now well within the Overton window, as is transgenderism (under a certain light). Self-diagnosis is a one way in which the chronically online make sense of the real world when it's ill-fitting to their distorted view addled by media and feeds.Here is an abstracted composite of shapes loosely derived from the female figure (excepting the head) to add to the collection as thanks for your discussion. I have never even seen this cartoon before.
>>151041407i want a hoofjob from her
>>151052695Anon... have you been shitposting this entire time? Because damn.
>>151052745I'm somewhat serious in analyzing how cartooning styles and audiences' reception and tolerances towards them have changed especially in regards to "indie" in the last 20 years from the Newgrounds days. Animators' approaches to generate traffic have become more subtle to work around the algorithm and to demographic's evolving sensitivities. I wonder where it came from and where it's going. I wouldn't die by anything I said, they're just theories, but the fact they come across as shitposting is a bonus.
>>151052239This artist was amazing, and I am sad I did not get a drawing from them around the time this one was made. Too far down the list, and the time difference fucked me.
>>151053089I hope he comes back. Dude was legit talented.
>>151052745i don't know if i prefer this or genuine schizos...eh, probably this, >>151052695 into >>151053062 is at least mildly amusing. it's not the best schizobabble writing, but that's hard to get right if you're even remotely sane.
>>151041407*rubs oil all over her voluptuous body*
>>151041407I want to rub my dick on those hooves
>>151041638as tall as a cyberdemon
>>1510434846 seems really funI bet she gives the weirdest but best foot jobs too.
>>151054677I've got stuff to do now, but if I appeared schizo it's because I didn't proofread, or simply pontificating what you haven't considered. Moralizing or "negativity" aside (which wasn't the intention) the fundamental point of how sexualized simple designs are closer to the primal, baked-in image of fertility, before it is given definition by life experience, is interesting to me. Like how candy satisfies the primal desire for sweet fruit with a big dopamine hit rewarded for finding something sweet; the infant brain ROM can't fit info about important vitamins, so it settles for "find something sweet".Moral part:Rather than beat about the bush, if the creators make these devil cartoons for the purpose of generating rule 34, they should just make it exclusively. Otherwise these cartoons are like a gateway drug, or treats its viewers like they can't watch anything without a constant undercurrent of pornography. Really I suspect its creators are just numb, which devalues sexuality as a whole, and R34-bait cartooning is a cynical marketing campaign that proliferates itself (and the mentality that encompasses it) through free labour.
>>1510567376 seems like she'd give you paizuri while asking you if you liked the feeling of her breasts on your dick or otherwise ask you to creampie her in a mature and stereotypical Asian accent
>>151043484>>1510567376 and 7 are definitely the freakiest. East Asian mommy fetish stuff and South Asian/Middle Eastern tantric stuff respectively.1 is relatively more vanilla but SERIOUSLY gets into it, Latina passion stuff.4 and 5 are the most vanilla overall, they've got that European and North America relative modesty but can definitely shift into femdom territory.3 and 8 are pretty wild but exclusively do doggy and cowgirl.2's just happy you actually like her and cuddles close to you the whole time.
>>151041407SEXO
>>151058441>6 and 7Anon no don't summon them!
>>151058704Satina rape
>>151041407She is a momma alright.
>>151041407I'd do it by hand
>>151043484I kinda wish the queen of hell from lat america had bigger hips.
>>151043484>East Asia>Genki personality with ginormous titsOh you just know she'd be an absolute FREAK
>>151043017Who voiced her?
>>151044972Source? Couldn't find it
>>151044688>>151045953TLDR Cartoons need more fat chicks
>>151063493
>>151063493itsunknownanon
Why aren't there more giant women in animation?
>>151058441>3>cowgirlso she's into crushing her partner's pelvis
>>151065531I'm pretty sure he meant 3 and 8 only do doggy and cowgirl respectively. 3's a horse thing and 8's a kangaroo thing.
