Zootopia 2's post credits scene will apparently show a feather blowing in Judy's window, thus confirming birds for the third movie. Thoughts?
Oh my..
>>151303410The feather will be from a stork
>blowing in Judy's windowsLucky-ass feather.
>>151303441Can't abort it if its from a stork.
>>151303410Birdbros...we won>>151303415Nice thumbnail faggot
>>151303410every time they anthropomorphize a new subgroup of animals, they reduce the food options for carnivores. it's bad worldbuilding, please stop.also, do they eat dairy in zootopia?
>>151303410I simply do not plan on watching any movie other than the first and hope the porn will be good.
darkwing duck going to be canon in zootopia
>>151303851Yeah, in Z1 you could just say the preds were eating roast chicken and shit, and everything was fine. Now apparently the chickens are sentient?
>>151303856From the story thread, the other day, It doesn't seem like it will be "Ralph Breaks the Internet" levels of bad.
>>151303851>>151303885I'd rather the antagonist of the third be an engangered species who views Zootopia as a whole as domesticating nature>>151303900That would be preferable, instead we have the director self-inserting to tell the audience they should hate cats for being a direct link between wild and domestic
>>151303851They already have fish for food, and I suppose bugs, which some countries do eat anyways, and I think they're related to crustaceans.
>>151303410Furries!>>151303415Fake
Does the fox knot the rabbit that's the only thing I care about
>>151303851No offense but freaking Donald Duck is a duck who eats other birds like turkey during the Christmas Special. Not only Donald but his nephews ate turkey flesh. And in House of Mouse Donald ate a steak and Daisy wanted to eat fish fillet.These characters are anthros. Anthros eat the FERAL animals. And these details for Disney's universal characters existed before Zootopia's AIDS ridden homosexual director was born. Anthros operate on rule of Anthros Are Human Stand Ins. For crying out loud even the goddamn Minotaur from mythology ate flesh and meat despite being based on a herbivore animal. Anthros will always be omnivores that stand for humans or humanoids and they feast on feral animals.
>>151304159Shakira is based as hell for making sure her self insert is just as pretty as her IRL, even when Disney wanted to nerf her hips
>>151304364She's not based she's simply a shitty aging old hag who still likes to pretend that she can compete with actual young women. And you sir are amazingly stupid. And Gazelle is NOT popular. The character is completely fucking worthless shit in-universe.
>>151303410Hope birds remain wild-life instead of sapient beings for several reasons:>world-buildingjust how the architecture of the city is important, the ecosystem of the planet where the city is, is important. Birds are perfect way to add balanced wild-life, they can be found in every biome and are various from herbivores to predators.Without birds the only beings left in the forests are spiders, snails and bunch of insects, which would make the world outside the city rather lifeless>a lack of wildlife would make Zootopians harder to be seen as "people". Big part of being a civilized being is our connection(and conflict) with nature. Protecting endangered species, making sure our expansion doesn't destroy living spaces of wild-life to detrimental levels, protecting the balance of the ecosystem.If birds remain wildlife we have a chance for unique messages about environmentalism, Judy and Nick protecting endangered eagles from poachers or exotic pet-smugglers for example.A "falconer" could be the equivalent of a "dog-trainer" in the Zootopia universe etc.>anthro birds don't translate well in Zootopia's design languageZootopia is animals walking on their hind-legs, and usually nothing more. They didn't became anatomically more human like Beastars characters. Just like how zootopian elephants can only use their trunks, and horses don't have fingers, birds wouldn't be able to do anything but fly with their wings, they would need to hold and grab everything with their beaks and foot. Only giving them the ability to talk isn't going to give them distinct looks.>heart - disney magicthere are very few things more magical, than when we intelligent beings connect with a wild animal through earning its trust. Helping these beings despite that they can't thank us with words. Protecting them from those members of our society that care less about them. I think its important that Zootopian characters like Judy and Nick can experience this magic.>pic related
>>151303415Liking hairy butts is gay.
>>151303851my biggest concern isn't even the food, but the ecosystem.insectovore birds play a huge role in keeping the ecosystem balanced, eating locusts and spiders etc. I would really hope that they keep them part of the wild-life
>>151304389>>anthro birds don't translate well in Zootopia's design languageThe entire art style of Zootopia is atrocious when you actually think about it. Only few species and somewhat look tolerable and even then they still look off. For example canines like wolves and foxes have long upper bodies but their legs? Those are midget short legs. So their bodies look.......uneven.Zootopia's art style is trash. And the larger a species like elephants the worse the end result. And then you get more problems due to reptiles and birds in how to design them.
>>151304444That's simple you idiot, simply explain away that there are anthro animals and ferals similar to Mickey Mouse's universe or Sly Cooper or Sonic the Hedgehog.
>>151304177spoiler:sadly no, but it will be heavily implied that she wants it, Nick's traumatic childhood just seems to have halted his development and she needs to knock down his emotional barriers before she has a chance at seducing him
>>151304460I really don't want that though... (?)I don't like the idea of Nick and Judy to existing in the same universe as wild regular foxes and rabbits.Would kind of detract of the entire "turning back savage" significance and the "a bunny can go savage" relevation of the first film, if there ARE actual savage bunnies out there in the wild
bunny cunny
>>151304449I actually find that quite charming about zootopia's canine design, its what makes it more of a cartoon than furry-fuel.Zootopian wolves are so short because they are actually plantigrade instead of digitgrade how most people draw anthros.
>>151303410I read this as >blowing Judy's widow
>>151303851You VILL eat ze bugs!
>>151304449They might have been slightly stylizing the proportions to Robin Hood. At least that's my guess, maybe they've actually stated how they decided on each in some behind the scenes thing.And lots of artists have differing ideas on how to do anthro. Among the most obvious is the difference in keeping more paw-like feet or bit flat feet like people.I suspect the flatter foot makes more sense, bipedal walking and all, evolution would want more surface area I think. And for animating you can be closer to doing normal movement rather than trying to imagine how bipedal running works on exaggerated tiptoes.
>>151303415Judy will get a BBL next movie.
>>151304306The mickey mouse unuvere animal people arent really animals. Theyre humans who look like animals.The zootopia animals are animals who look and act like people.The difference is in one situation the trappings of the real world animals theyre based on are relevant and focused on, and in the other they are ignored as soon as the conflict with their humanity.
>>151304385Counter argument: I like gazelle
>>151304465>Judy Hopps letting out the coffee-and-donut induced gas that was building up all morning
>>151304306and who decides what the line for feral is?
This makes less and less sense the more they try to make it bigger than it needs to be
>>151303410are these threads the only way to bypass the no furry rule?
>>151303851>>151304389Counterpoint, reptiles and birds mog the shit out of boring mammals and rodents so them getting added as anthro characters is an inherent benefit
>trolls>shrek>beauty and the beast>tiana and naveen (frogs)>tarzan>mikey and minnie>lion king>etc>now zootopiadisney clearly has a weird fetish / obsession with furry couples. wildehopps happening is the most obvious shit ever. not in zootopia 2 but in zootopia 3 because they chose not to rush it (and money)
>>151307736>shrekHardly "furry shit".>beauty and the beast>tiana and naveen (frogs)Both people become human by the end.>tarzanBoth human, and it's just a fantasy for women about having seggs with a wildman.>mickey and minnieJust the company mascot gets pussy.>lion kingSure, I guess that's furrybait.
>>151307736>etcNever saw that one. What's it about?
>>151307736>every couple except wildehops is (or ends up as) the same speciesunless hybrids suddenly exist in zootopia’s world, it’s not happening, disney doesn’t want kids asking their parents how a fox and a rabbit can make babies
>>151307736you're mentally ill bro
>>151303410Really? I heard some guys already saw the movie. Did the shipper got what they wanted or didn't happened at all.>>151304159That's a nice gazelle, too bad her main outfit in the second movie almost covers her entirely, i guess for censors compared to the first one.This one is actually on the movie?
>>151308051>it’s not happeningYou're retarded. It's easy to access the premiere content. Literally the entire movie is wildehopps' development except they don't end up together but the feelings are there. I'm guessing they will make a 3rd or 4th movie to finish it off
>>151308051As far as I am aware the only prominent interspecies couples in the history of Disney are the main leads of Chicken Little, Oswald and Ortensia, and Goofy and Clarabelle. And in these cases the former are both birds and the later two are very similar looking characters in the inkblot realm even if they are different species. Nick x Judy would me the most glaring differences between an animated couple in the company's history. Looney Tunes has done it before but for Disney this is unprecedented
>>151307813yeah they end up human at the end because this is disney's way of hiding their kink. if they didnt then theyd get bashed by anti-beastiality chads.>Both people become human by the end.yeah and theyre furries like 4/5 of the movie except for the last few minutes.
>>151308251Why are you pretending that goofy animals haven't also been marketable to children for like a hundred years?
>>151308281well yeah, disney is the reason furries exist in the first place.
>>151304465Did they really fucking chicken out from making them an official couple, but they are selling official disney couple merch of them in disneyland shanghai?
>>151307539rodents are mammalsand I really don't think Zootopia birds could build a society. Their limitation of using their legs to grab stuff, would prevent them from really using many tools organically and believably.
Imagine if Judy had to wear a diaper as part of a disguise and needed to user the bathroom really bad in the middle of the mission
>>151305518I do.
>>151308936Lagomorphs arent rodents
>>151303410Who cares so long as we get more shots of Judy in those yoga pants?
>>151303410Why should I care unironically about this?Was anyone excited about Birdville?
your human dick would be way bigger than what she's expecting, if you even fit at all. It just wouldn't work, so stop thinking about it.
>>151303851You eat ape meat, so what's the problem?
>>151303410>actual curves and ass on a Disney lead in 2025They said it couldn't be done.
>>151303410bigger
>>151309605And louder
>>151303410You know you love her, /co/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lebfCS55go
>>151303851Didn't the trailers already confirm that they eat fish at least?
>>151309694Imagine if she https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaoKuCUl8Aw in that dress
>>151308084> This one is actually on the movie?Don’t know. It’s from the Chinese poster
>>151304159>Fakegood job retard. you nailed it.
>>151303415this makes me realize how shitty a big furry ass would feel. I think I'm over furries now. I'm cured, 15 years of this shit wiped away in a single image.
>>151308501Based on the mid credit scene, they revealed Judy is developing a crush on Nick. Not a couple but that's the direction.
This series is unironically what ruined furries.
>>151303410>Thoughts?Zootopia 2 doesn't need to existBut its existence will create more furry pornErgo I am in favor of it
>>151309623cant tell if this is a really subtle Cats Dont Dance reference or a fart joke
>>151310220Why would it be a Cats Don't Dance reference?
>>151304159why does she look like an anime character
>>151310270https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n2iAY28kAw
>>151310346I know that.You think she overheard staff or a co-star say "Here comes Little Miss Big and Loud..." one time, and they told her they were talking about her performance and not what happens when she eats a little too much of the catering?
>>151309605Make it BIGGER
>>151310974And LOUDER
>>151303410>thus confirming birds for the third movieEverything goes through so many levels of focus groups and executive-mandated rewrites that I think it's unrealistic to put any real degree of faith in "confirmations" before an explicit announcement.
>>151309568She can stuff my balls in her mouth while I use her ears to jerk off.
>>151311074Calling all drawfags!
>>151309605Is this edited?
>>151309578wtf? no i don't. that's how HIV was born.
>>151310220https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAW1UQfhMU4&t=8
>>151311427As the guy who posted it, it's not
>>151311502Shut up, random idiot. You're just trying to ruin the joke.
>>151303415>>151303410Is there any nudity in the movie though?
>>151310297How?
>>151303410nick still might be outdoing her
Human fucking size queen
>>151313578Imagine if you could hear one of them crinkle during this scene
>>151308501Asian Disney merch might was well be an entirely different continuity of its own
>>151313578Me in middle
Call me when the great apes show up
>>151310184Furry art has been declining in quality for a decade for a variety of reasons, but Zootopia is probably one of them.
>>151303410Why the fuck would you make the existence of talking bird seem like a hype moment? Like this is some kind of Smash reveal? They're IN!
>>151303415I blame Disney for making me want to ravage the bunny. It's their fault I'm a furry now >:(. Fuckin' libs.
>>151303900Ralph 2 needed a rewrite to just make two things clear>both mains were toxic in their friendship with Ven being toxic positivity >Ven had to be removed from her own game because of how busted she was and everyone was likely programmed to love her no matter how unfair she made things for themThere is no fix for Zootopia 2, because it fundamentally goes against the first movie by stating that an entire specie can be evil and its evil members are all unredeemable
>>151315377Continuing, the entire point of Gideon was that foxes can be bad but also can stop being badMr. B was there to show that even tiny animals can be big criminals and on a (relatively) gray scale of morality Bellwether was the only sheep we saw, but it was generally rather self evident that her facade was how sheep in general were acting. There was nothing indicating that there was an entire cabal of evil sheep Judy was all about going against assumptions about rabbits The point was that you shouldn't think with stereotypes because individuals differ But now all lynxleys are evil
>>151304306Birds eat each other all of the time.
>>151315436>all lynxleys are evilThat's their surname. I don't think they're the only lynxes in the city.
>>151309694>>151304465She is really easy on the eyes
>>151313578I would totally fuck that beaver up the ass
>>151315496>it is just one family Again, Mr. Big was the one doing ice'ing, his daughter didn't have any direct involvement with his crimes Judy was different from her family. Individual qualities were the core of Zootopia 1.And there isn't even one good example to offset an entire evil family, while the family name is their specie. Not to mention their stereotype wasn't being harmless like a sheep. In 1, there was downplayed need of showing us a stereotypical sheep when (before the twist) we already had a one. Here we have rich fat cats and, surprise, surprise, they are all evilOne of them should be redeemable. And one of reptiles should be unreedemable as well. It's the most basic thing when you present this kind of story to children.
>>151310149i heard about this a lot, but I don't dare to believe it. other reviewers are celebrating that there is nothing romantic implied in the movie at all and they are "straight-bait", which is like... they could be metaphore for an interraccial or lgbtq couple who can't have a kid and must adopt, so why are they so againts it?It would be nice for them to be built up to become romantic in Z3, but at this point I feel like if I dare to hope even a little, I am doomed to be disappointed, like I am with the fact they aren't even hinting at it that they might be dating in Z2...
>>151316000>"straight-bait", which is like... they could be metaphore for an interraccial or lgbtq coupleThat's political identity brain rot. If these people hear hoof beats, they think of zebras, not horses because they don't have enough life exp.
>>151303410What story can you tell with birds that you didn't JUST tell with lizards?
>>151303410Why is Zootopia just Beastars now?I miss when only mammals were anthropomorphic, it felt unique from other furry settings.
>>151316157>>151316181my point exactly why I proposed >>151304389birds should be still be wild animals, it would be a cool environmentalist story
>>151316230Nick in Zootopia 2: I have reptile phobia, but I must learn to respect and live with them and help them as I would help any other citizen.Nick in Zootopia 3: birds are delicious, but I still need to treat them as living beings even if they can't talk
>>151313578we're learning key things about these character's emotions
Damn Nick one slap is all it takes?
>>151315436there was a nice sheep at the start but she got abducted
>>151315446No we don't.
>>151303851Imagine if they pull a similar move like in Bojack where they lobotimize and pump newborn livestock with hormones.
>>151316659>okay grok write a murder mystery novel about this young sheep from Zootopia from the perspective of a human male who is a detective on the case. In his search he comes across Judy Hopps and the bunny eager to help with the case tries seducing the lone-wolf noir style detective but he cracks the case and rips Judy hopps in half after discovering that she murdered the young sheep after the traumatic event with Gideon Grey in a bid for the feeling of being a predator, he also puts forth evidence that Judy has been viciously abusing innocent predator citizens, including her own partner Nick Wilde who had been the one to request the PI's help in the first place. He gets into an altercation with her using her extreme agility to her advantage but he gets the upper hand and tears her limb from limb in an act of self defense
>>151303410bnuuy
>>151315743>One of them should be redeemable. And one of reptiles should be unreedemable as well. It's the most basic thing when you present this kind of story to children.Yeah, there are heroes on both sides.
Zootopia 3 will feature a 10 minute sex scene between Judy and Nick
>>151310297It's the Elsa eyes. For context, the artist who designed Elsa and Anna's face is korean, hence why they look so bland and anime-coded and look nothing like actual caucasian women.
no joke, 1 quick playful kiss would've been the most on-brand confirmation of them as a couple.like imagine the closing scene that is described in the novel this way:>Nick gifting the carrot pen back and sying "I love you partner">Judy plays back the "i love you" part>Nick tries to get the pen back and Judy turns around and goes>Don't worry I'll let you erease it>*steals a kick smooch on the lip*>after 48 more of these! >*Runs away playfully to her family that are talking to the snakes leaving Nick stunned looking after her while slowly a small open mouted smile curls up on his face.*THAT last moment confirmation when nobody would expect it anymore would've been such an unexpected surprise, that the every theater around the world would explode into celebration when seeing it. Really wished I would read or hear about a scene like that...Feel like not doing any cathartic grand reveal of their relationship-status leaves the romantic tension too high up in the air, and makes you leave the cinema feeling unsatisfied and just even more hopelessly asking for a confirmation. I hope Jared and Byron are actually foreshadowing the romance for Z3 with this and not planning on doing a rug-pull after they get everyone's hopes up
>>151317972you already said this
>>151317984? ? ? which part?the alternative scene to the ending, or that I hope Jared and Byron will deliver on their promise in Z3?Because I do not recall saying either
>>151304465disney is too cowardly to show an interspecies couple
>>151317972>>151318238Think this will actually cost them the oscar (and maybe even the 1 billion box office mark)A movie that doesn't resolve its own tension is a lot harder to rewatch.I could watch Zootopia 1 a hundred of times because it wrapped up everything it set up, and teased NEW possibilites at the end. It wasn't about romance, but at the end that little cheeky "you know you love me" was enough to make people hopeful.Zootopia 2, from what I hear, does not wrap up the thing it set up.
>>151318277Ne zha 2 better
>>151317972Disney is incredibly lazy and awkward when it comes to romantic subplots these days, and you can see where it started all the way back in Frozen. That movie had a romantic finish but it was handled awkwardly and was not the emotional through line.The Bad Guys 2 came out only like 3 years after the first movie and they delivered on what the fans wanted. No reason Disney couldn't have done the same after 9 years between Zootopia movies.
>>151318750
How much more of the furry community would Disney attract if there was a scene of Judy Hopps clearly needing to "go" after a previous scene of her drinking a soda portioned for larger animals?
>>151318890Judy is around 500 away from having the most art on e621. Nick already is the most for a male by over 5000Unless they made official porn they could not get more of a furry audience
>>151303410This movie is going to suck. Hard.
if they ship Judy and Nick in the third movie, how would they make it so it's not just Elemental but furry?
>>151320390
>>151320479Elemental is already "zootopia but not-furry"If Zootopia team wouldn't have decided to tone town the romance in the first one and leave them ambiguous, they would have been the same movie.
>>151303410>>151303415>>151309605
>>151320863Imagine if they kept that in the movie
>>151320863
>>151320943More like 10 more years of fart, haha...
>>151320971
>>151303415Fug
>>151313222>>151309694>White chest/belly fur.
>>151321012Furry
>>151318238...Kermit and Miss Piggy? Hello?
>>151321450wasn't one of the first thing they did after getting the rights to the muppets to have them officially divorce?or did they get back together?
>>151321073Chief Bogo sure can CUM
>>151303415>>151309833Yeah second this it's not so attractive when it's that much fur. A lot of furry art draws characters as if they had skin instead of fur with light bouncing off the ass or something. There's a similar effect with her wearing those pants, it's almost like fat people wearing certain pants so their shape looks better than it is.
>>151318277By perspective, there really was no tension in the first movie. The tension between Nick and Judy was only introduced in the second movie. They plan to resolve it in the third.
>>151317972That sounds too forward. This is what they did: the movie shows Nick might like Judy more than a friend and co-worker. Judy did not reciprocate this in the movie. It seemed all Nick. Then the mid credits scene rolls. Judy plays the "love ya" part of the "love ya partner" message repeatedly in private. Its implied she might have finally fallen for Nick. If she kissed him in the movie, you ruin that mid credit scene. Its now confirmed theres romantic interest there but is left to be explored in the next movie along with birds.
>>151322523>>151320971
>>151322523
>>151320943>10 MORE years>Zootopia's been out for almost ten yearsWhy does this happen to me specifically with Disney movies? Every time one comes out, I blink and suddenly it's been five years since it came to theaters. Toy Story 4 came out six and a half years ago already.
>>151322683
>>151322411Kind of, the first movie introduced them to eachother and they both learned to respect and care for the other despite their differences, and managed to work together to save the city. But it TEASED a little bit of tension with them being flirty-messing with eachother like seriously, Judy made a sex joke about"I might be just a bunny buut, we are good at multiplying"Nick admitting multiple times that he thinks she is cute, and of course the final "you know you love me"That final part is loaded, because yeah some argue that "that could be just friendly banter of platonic love"But yeah when FRIENDS tell each other they love each other, and you don't stare into eachother's eyes for a prolonged period of time. And how does the scene ends?Cut to the traffic light, switching to green with a loud ding. - why? other traffic lights dont ding, and it was not needed to focus on it for this scene.Feels like a subliminal message to greelight the start of a romance.Overall they were very much intended to be a couple, they just toned it back down to it doesn't take away attention from the prejudice message, if you look at deleted scenes like Judy's family mistaking Nick for her boyfriend, Nick going with it and calling Stu "dad" and others.Did you know there was a version of the movie, where Nick gets naked at the naturalist club just to mess with Judy further. They actually forgot to fix the take where he gets dressed again when leaving, that's why he fixes his tie when they come out of the building. It would've made Nick too much of a jerk probably, and they wanted to make them soulmates.
>>151322730you're insane bro
>>151322514>That sounds too forward. I think Judy had feeling for him from the start, she just represses it.Nick's disconnected affectation is causing her frustration, even the therapist notices that. She wants Nick to show more care about her.Then when Nick deflects a touching moment before the gala with humor about her ear, she jabs him in the stomach out of frustration. I feel like she wanted something there, more compliments, a moment of softness, and she lashed out in frustration because he ruined it.>That sounds too forward. This is what they did: i know what they did, I'm saying they should've left the mid-credit scene out and do a kiss. At the ending.The other mid-credit scene that was rumored with Robert Irwin's Koala would've worked fine to tease the future of the series.
>>151322633Judy and Nick is literally the only ship I ever cared about or discussed, i never really talked to anyone in any other fandom, so to be grouped together with every shipper from every community as if people that like any ship are all 1 entity of some love-obsessed secret society that tries to ruin your favorite franchises, by insertion unnecessary love discussion into them, is really weird.But I believe that "when you wish something bad at someone, it fall back on you", so I wish you nothing more than if Judy and Nick does become first canon enemies to lovers disney couple in the future, it will be done in a way that even you will find immense joy in. That you won't see it as forced or something they only did to please the fans, but something that you feel like was deserved for them.
>>151323074
>>151322763if you mean the "nick gets naked at the naturalist club" part, no, it's real, saw a 3D render alt scene of Yax talking a lot more about the naturalist club and their no-clothes mentality and lifestyle while walking towards Nangi the elephant, and it cuts off with him looking behind Judy going "HEEEY THIS GUY GETS IT!"
>>151322800>Judy had feeling for him from the startThey were ambigous because you couldn't tell if she was just acting that way to deal with Nick. You could say it was "friendly." But the mid credit scene confirms she has feelings for Nick because she was in private. She could be herself without acting a certain way around Nick and it showed her acting like a teenaged girl with a dumb crush by autistically repeating a part of Nick's recording. She was probably fantasizing about Nick telling her that he loves her.
>>151309694>abortion dressI'm thinkin' Arby's
>>151323387
>>151304632digitigrade legs also dont make sense to actually support the weight of the entire body. digitigrade anthros grills are way cuter tho
>>151323319I agree with you, that it only becomes OBVIOUS thanks to the mid-credit scene. but some are suspecting it a lot.Like some pointed out that female bunnies like to play-box their potential mates as a form of bonding or initiating play.she is very touchy with Nick almost from the moment he got next to her in his uniform I mean look at this.Thats reads like a crazy bunny that can't contain her excitement to has her crush work with her. And poor Nick is just totally confused because that feels like the opposite of fox love language. Really hoped the movie would dwelve into species communication differences like these with a relevation of >"wait... you DO LOVE ME? Then why are you punching me all the time, I thought you are angry at me">"Angry? those are love-jabs, its a bunny's way to let a boy know she likes him">"... okay, I need to get a book on bunny culture I see"
>>151323480true and true
>>151323319>But the mid credit scene confirms she has feelings for Nick because she was in privateWhich mid-credits scene are you talking about?
>>151323645he just described it in the same post your replied to.
>>151323236>>151322800disregard that other anon, your points are all very good
>>151323432>mary and jesus aren't sheep
>>151323645Its the one where Judy masturbates while thinking of Nick. Based of Disney to leave that in.
>>151322514I just feel like if you need to push a wildehopps confirmation into Zootopia 3 you are being too un-confident about the potential of the franchise.I am 100% sure that if they would've confirmed WildeHopps in Z2, even more people would go to see Z3 to see where the relationship goesZ2 leaving them a maybe (even if a strong maybe) has discouraged a lot of my friends, thinking that if all this romantic imagery and foreshadowing was left without a pay-off moment, then they won't confirm them even in Z3, because HOW do you top romantic tension, than going together to a fancy gala and doing investigation at a honeymoon lodge where Nick give Judy this look while lying on a hear-shaped bead>pic relatedhow do you top that and make the kiss at the end feel earned without watching Z2?Some straight up cancelled their plan for the movie-meetup, saying if they are not an official couple, they can wait till it comes out to Disney+
>>151303415Taxidermy looking ass.
>>151303851Ahkshully its better because it reinforces the idea that they have to get the meat from somewhere.Someone out there is disappearing mammals for ethically sources organic meat for predators and that's better than having a secret inferior species that's used for food.
>>151324579the fact that 14 disappearing mammals in Zootopia 1 was a big enough problem that the Police Chief made it priority number 1 kinda makes me not believe that a possibility.But I agree with the other anon, that birds would be better as semi or non-sapient. They don't work as anthros. They are already walking on 2 legs, and they can't use their wings as hands in Zootopia's design language. And it would be funny to see mammals dealing with regular birds. Pigeons pooping on your car, seagulls stealing your food, parrots saying back mean wordsOr actual reference to real life conflicts with nature. Like when a town deals with a bear walking in on main-street could be similiar to when an eagle gets too close to BunnyBurrow and they need to call in the ZPD to drive the bird back into nature.Also, this pic is from the little golden book.Wonder if the ice sculpture will be in the final movie too
>>151303410
>>151307736>shrek>disney
>>151324374They have no taste for good writing. It filtered them out. That's good. You put the confirmation of wildehopps in the final installment of the franchise, not the middle or else the IP peaks before it ends.
I am absolutely interested if not going any further then Zootopia 1 with the ship will kill off the Asian market interest.Right now Zootopia 2 presales are huge and frontloaded with the film having a potential to be China's biggest Hollywood hit. However they are huge on the ship and waited 10 years for it to be confirmed, where now it the exact same friendship as the first film, which may kill word of mouth alongside the we wuz kangz plotline.And they might be setting them up for a Zootopia 3 in 10 years, but they might lose interest entirely in 10 years if it does not happen now. If China is still importing Hollywood movies by then.They seemed to think so hard for the spreadsheet-decided no romance angle for the west market they did not account what made it popular in Asia
>>151320863Ass cheeks emerge from having legs. They cheat in 2d to make crotches and cracks disappear. Cant do that in 3d
>>151323515>ORA PRA ORA ORA ORA ORA ORA
>>151325053>where now it the exact same friendship as the first filmsome rumors suggests its more though. Can't confirm anything whenever the rumored mid-credit scene of Judy blushing and fawning over the voice-recording of Nick saying "I love you" is real or not. But some reputable sources did say that the marketing did not mislead or instill false-hope for the ship. There is something even if its a subtle hint at it.As for if the subtle hint will be enough for China, is another story. I don't know what kind of media is popular in china maybe they are big fans implied romance where they can fantasize their own stories how it will actually start and who will make the first move.But maybe it really doesn't matter, Chinese Disneyland already threats Judy and Nick as canon couple, the mascots in the part are allowed to be super flirty and even sneak eachother a kiss sometime.>They seemed to think so hard for the spreadsheet-decided no romance angle for the west market they did not account what made it popular in AsiaThat would be quite ironic because the entire snake angle was introduced because they aimed to make the movie for this year, the chinese year of the snake. The entire movie felt like it was tailored for the chinese market, so leaving out the only thing that the chinese people want would be insane.A friend of mine suggested what if Disney straight up makes 2 endings for the movie, one of the western and one for the eastern market, where the eastern is much more conclusive about them. I find it unlikely but there were movies that did multiple endings in theater before.>And they might be setting them up for a Zootopia 3 in 10 yearsIn interviews they were rather adamant about it, that they really hope that if Z2 does well they can straight up jump into making Z3 a lot faster. Considering they said they might be teasing birds with the after-credits scene, I wouldn't find it impossible that they are aiming for the year of the Rooster (2029)
>>151325534Supreme ruller will be dead. CCP collapse. West Taiwan will be free in 10 years.
>>151325743>West Taiwanaw, fellow habitual linecrosser watchergood taste
>>151315377The bigger thing Ralph 2 needed to do was introduce the "Vanelope can't be killed in Slaughter Race" thing at the beginning of the conflict. Maybe she dies the first time she and Ralph enter, but she respawns for some reason. Then later Shank explains the game started development as a modern version of Sugar Rush before being reworked into Slaughter Race, so the game's code still recognizes her as a valid character.Now she's WAY more justified in wanting to run off to this game and Ralph's motivations are as selfish as they're supposed to be (unlike the actual movie, where he's pretty justified in keeping her away from the game where can die forever).
>>151303410Hey Pawbert i want to fuck your sister
>>151326054not sure what everyone sees in her, she looks like a typical rich bitch that would complain about you not buying the right color of bentley for her.I am more of the cute airport assistant form the Dynamyte comic guy
>>151326526weird, pretty sure I selected a file
>>151326559That happens to me all the time. I attach a picture, to my message but said post doesn't contain the image I selected.I still blame moot.
>>151325053Rip demon slayer
>>151323236Damn, that's an outtake i've yet to see. I thought i've seen them all. Is it still available?
>>151327318sure let me just...found it! https://www.reddit.com/r/zootopia/comments/1az06bb/deleted_naturalist_club_sceneyax_footage_that_i/
>>151326526>>151326559Im more of a Gazelle guy, they made her ass more bigger for the sequel
>>151327493she tooted when she bent down, that's why the guys are moving away
>>151327493Based Shakira
>>151327493Disney panders to furries
There's plenty of 3D Models of Judy but she never really seems to get much 3D Art, there's cartoony models, on-model movie style ones and horny pornified versions.
>>151327493I remember Shakira saying Gazelle was too skinny in the first movie. They made her a little thicker for the movie but apparently they made her even thicker for the sequel. Too human now.
>>151327493>Trust me guys making Gazelle more thicc will make this movie hit another billonShakira probably
