He's right you know.
>>151560346OP is a huge faggot
>>151560346My favorite edit is the one where he brings up Hollywood banning communists
>>151560346
>>151560353/pol/yps are huge closeted faggots.
>>>/tg/97111111
>>151560346The moment people like this try to lecture you on 1st amendment bullshit regarding how you're right to be "cancelled" or whatever for an opinion, just ask if they would feel the exact same way if it was them being cancelled and told that nobody wants to hear their opinions.If they ever say something along the lines of "But that would never happen to me" like I'm sure stickman here would, then you can immediately disregard everything they say.
>>151560507They still hold power over you, hypocrisy is a pointless victory if they don’t care.
>>151560421You are
>>151560546Still helps me determine which mouthbreathers aren't worth talking to, aka the ones that uncritically agree with this comic without considering what if the shoe were on the other foot.
As a matter of fact, Viziepop is right about what hell is like. Brb got another furpile to attend.
>>151560642What?
>>151560662It's a metaphor
Unironically he's right.>NOOOOOOO I SHOULD BE ABLE TO VERBALLY ABUSE PEOPLE!You don't want to hang out with a bunch of pink haired feminist, fat liberals or bluey troons and avoid them at all costs. When they come here you call them fagots and tell them to get lost or to kill themselves. You are just doing the edgy internet way of showing them the door and mob justice.
>>151560372wtf that's not loss.>>151560507That's pretty much what happened after Charlie Kirk was killed too bad rightoids are too much of pussies to actually cancel people properly but can now safely add a new step>It's not happening >It's happening but it's not a big deal>It's happening and that's a good thing >WOW WHY ARE YOU DOING THAT TO US?! STOP THAT'S NOT A GOOD THING!
>>151560594>what if the shoe were on the other foot.i feel like this can win any and all arguments
>>151560705*faggots
>>151560346i guess some people need to know this, but i'd worry more about the people who think that censorship is based.
>>151560421Yeah I’m sure you are
>The right to free speech means the government can't arrest youThat's not what it means. That's the definition people invented when they wanted to keep doing it but call it something else. The government is a corporation. Corporations are governments.
>>151560729You'd worry about Abraham Lincoln and FDR?
>>151560776i worry about ideas regardless of whose mouht they're coming from, yes.
>>151560346Xkcd has never had a good political take. He should really stop because it makes him look like an idiot and brings into question any knowledge he has in science.
>>151560346Haven't seen this since this since Musk bought Twitter. I wonder why.
>>151560830doesnt xkcd have its own website?
>>151560908https://xkcd.com/1357/
>>151560705It's not about people, it's about corporations. By saying "The first amendment is only for the government" he's trying to make corporations not liable for violating human rights. It's a false dichotomy with the government on the one end and everybody else on the other, even though there's nothing in common between people and companies.
>>151560954aren't companies run by people who work in companies though?
>>151560983Companies are ran by shareholders. The people working in those companies really don't have any say.
>>151560983They basically want to have their cake and eat it too. They want companies to be treated as people for all the perks, right up until the point it disadvantages them, then suddenly they're either just brick and mortar buildings or ideas that can't be taxed further or held to certain standards. Then rinse and repeat.
>>151561009>The people working in those companies really don't have any say.unless they hold a strike
>>151560346The main reason this missed the mark is because 3/4 of the things he mentions as "not violating your rights" are in fact subject to certain legal restrictions:>yelled atDepending on the severity and duration of the yelling and whether or not it includes threats of illegal acts against you, this can count as harassment, which is a crime and not protected by the 1st amendment.>boycottedHe's right here, nobody has an obligation to purchase any goods or services you provide and can vote with their wallets. Oh, except if the government makes boycotting you illegal, like in the case of Israel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-BDS_laws>have your show cancelledPeople may have legal protection from this because firing someone for opinions they express as a private citizen not in the course of their work could be an infringement of their 1st amendment rights. It depends on the terms of your employment contract, but court cases have been fought over this and people have won unfair dismissal claims against their employers.>get b& from an internet communityThe one case where he's actually correct, because being part of an online community (including 4chan) is entirely voluntary and subject to you abiding by the rules they set out. So if he just said that, this comic would not have been nearly as controversial.
>>151560346le im with her science stickman is a fag but he's correct. you'd all unanimously agree if the popular opinions just so happened to be your opinions but because it generally means you cant scream niggerkikes in public without getting fired you get upsetnow someone post the beer comic so we can all laugh at something objectively terrible
>>151560346I wonder if he still agrees with this one.
>>151561032Strikes are notorious for failing anon.
>>151560729People like censorship, as long as it's censoring things they don't like. They hate it when it censors things they do like.
>>151561116people still do it anyway, like the starbucks one recently
