[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Garfield.jpg (127 KB, 700x936)
127 KB
127 KB JPG
Do these films hold up?
>>
Yeah, they still suck.
>>
God no.
>>
>i was so hungry, john
>>
>>151663106
It's one of those pieces of evidence that showcases just how absolutely retarded actors are and how it's incredibly easy to make a movie if you can make the script flexible enough to make it about any existing property.
>>
>>151663106
I think the first movie is honestly fine. Like it has enough of a fun atmosphere for a kids movie and I still liked some of the jokes I did as a kid when I rewatched it awhile back. Somehow despite having a lot more going on the 2nd one feels MORE generic and dumb once you get to Garfield fucking around with the rich animals.
>>
>>151663106
Bill Murray talked shit as if he hasn’t starred in worse. Wasn’t even a physical actor on it either, didn’t have to be there for the long set hours, he recorded his lines separately in his apartment



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.