You'd think /co/ would talk about this German IP all the time, because it's cute and wholesome and /co/ really likes wholesomeness, family friendly media and traditional values.And yet, I never see it mentioned.There are books, a show and a movie.The movie has very different designs. I never saw the series but I remember the books, and the movie is very good. Movie trailer: https://youtu.be/WWaCIoG3-zo
>>151769483>/co/ really likes wholesomeness, family friendly media and traditional values.Ah yes, for sure if /co starts talking about it, that would be the reason
>>151769483Whenever someone types "wholesome" on /co/ it's for a loli thread
>>151770126You have a problem with that?
Think I saw some episodes of it now and then while it was airing, this is probably the first time in many years I even thought about it.
How much of it exists dubbed into Eng?
>>151769531Post full, coward.
>>151769483I've seen this, it's a cute movie but there's not much t talk about
>>151770202I prefer honest threads, like the PPG threads on /a/ absolutely are about them being lewd and as a result new lewd art is born from them
>>151770239/a has PPG threads?You mean PPGZ?
>>151771195One is never without the other
What is it about?
>>151771449It's about 1 hour with 20 minutes.There's also live action 2021 version I just found out about, and don't ask me why but the poster looks AI.It probably isn't though.
>>151769531Butt please.
>>151769483saw that as a kid when it came out and I remember it being quite good and atmospheric. apparently reviewers thought so too. and the soundtrack was made by Hans Zimmer feels to me like most german /co/ media isn't talked about much, even stuff that's a household name like Werner or Captain Bluebear. which as far as I know never got translated. I guess Werner wouldn't translate well outside its culture.
IWWKOPSW...
>>151769483With the movies it's clear that they wanted to make it Hamtaro related but Shogakukan and TMS said no, Imagine if Laura Star was Japanese produced and was Hamtaro related, making it Laura's movie and having it not be about hamsters.FUCK, the boy on the left even looks like Roberto for fuck sakes.
>>151774460Fuck Hamtaro.
>>151774546No, Laura's Star needed to be a Hamtaro movie that was centered on Laura.This way Laura got the star attention she deserved.
>>151774701Why Hamtaro?
>>151774711Design expies.
>>151774769You know you're a hamtaro autist, right?
>>151769531You know anon it's insulting to OP that had good intentions with this thread and yet it's you the one that didn't post sauce>>151771449Got this from Wikipedia "Laura is a seven-year-old country girl who just moved with her family to a big city. On her first night in her new neighborhood, she sees a shooting star falling to Earth. Laura finds the star in a park and discovers that it is a living being.">>151774329>the soundtrack was made by Hans ZimmerHuh, wasn't expecting that.Well, this one caught my attention. Going to give it watch in a couple of days.
I wonder what kind of pantsu she wears...
Seriously, what's it about?
>>151774460>>151774701>>151774769Why do you Hamtarofags always keep trying to ruin a good thread on cute cartoons with your shit? Seriously, just fuck off.
>>151777474>HamtarofagsThere are no Hamtarofags, there's only one.>>151769531I looked that one up.>Graveyard GuyI should have known...
>>151777497>Not jcm2Awww....
>>151777474The designs are too much alike not to bring it up.
>>151777635Since when? If anything, they come across more like Ghibli and less like Hamtaro.
>>151774460>>151777686>first claims the movie was supposed to be about Hamtaro even though the original Laura's Star book was published in 1996 and both the movie and the book are from Germany.>now claims it's the character designsFuck off, pretty sure you are the same schizo that is obsessed with TMS and tries to link them with WB cartoons.
>>151777859 meant for >>151777635>>151777686sorry about that
>>151777859NTG, I only bring up Ghibli because it at least have its similarities. Unlike Hamtaro, which is your average 90s anime. The Hamtarofag is just trying to make up excuses so he can disrupt the thread with his shit.
>>151777686Ghibli has no characters that match the expies Laura's Star has, Hamtaro on the other hand lifted Laura and Roberto's designs wholesale, as much to the point to avoid getting sued.>>151777916Hamtaro is 2000s.
>>151769483You brought this upon yourself, OP.
>>151778133OP here; It's not my fault that the film has the expies it has.
>>151778092>Ghibli has no characters that match the expies Laura's Star hasMeanwhile, this character from Ghibli looks more like Laura than the other one (who is never originally named Laura to begin with) from some anime crap nobody except you care about.>Hamtaro on the other hand lifted Laura and Roberto's designs wholesale, as much to the point to avoid getting sued.Source?>Hamtaro is 2000s.Nope, it's from the 90s. Look it up, the pilot episode was created all the way back in 1999.
>>151778220No the case what so ever, It's clear that said German film producers wanted to make a movie about Laura and Roberto but because TMS and Shogakukan said no they had to use expies, it looks nothing like Ghibli as Ghibli has no characters that match this.Billions of people cared about Hamtaro.The base TV anime was in 2000, the Pilkot doesn't count as that is a separate canon as was the books which dates back to 1997.You're delulu, seek help.
>>151778271>No the case what so ever, It's clear that said German film producers wanted to make a movie about Laura and Roberto but because TMS and Shogakukan said no they had to use expies, it looks nothing like Ghibli as Ghibli has no characters that match this.Again, no single evidence to back your claims other than "OMG look guys, she looks like that character therefore I'm right!" Also, Chihiro has a facial design that fits more like Laura than the crap anime you watch.>Billions of people cared about Hamtaro.Then why didn't Hamtaro reach mainstream status as Mickey Mouse and Spongebob Squarepants then? Oh yeah that's right, because nobody cares about dumb hamsters LOL>The base TV anime was in 2000, the Pilkot doesn't count as that is a separate canon as was the books which dates back to 1997.When things are made in the 90s, it's from the 90s.>You're delulu, seek help.IronyIn the end, I'm starting to assume that you're trying to make bait to make yourself look good only for them to come across as so piss-poor that literally anyone including newfags can make a better job than you. Now do yourself a favor, and fuck off to whatever shit hole you crawl out of.
>>151778518>This guy is fucking retarded.Not the case what so ever, you're delulu.Hamtaro did reach the mainstream, case in point.Pilot Hamtaro =/= TV Hamtaro; it's just like The Simpsons while there were the Tracy Ullman shorts and Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire in the 80s the show it self is 90s.Theres no Irony, only facts, you delulu retard.
>>151778566>They said this>They did that>They cared>They saidHoly schizo, all I wanted was one evidence backing your claims that it was related to Hamtaro.>ImageYeah, I'm pretty sure you made that by yourself. Nobody falling for that garbage.Your baits are some of the worst I have ever seen and that's saying something.
>>151778751That image originated from Cal-Arts and was leaked out of a Discord server, it is real.Also theres no bait here, only facts.
>>151778839Btw I literally just searched the title of the image, and it didn't take me more than one minute to find the source. Nice try faggot.Facts needs evidence to back up which you obviously lack. Just admit that you are baiting and I'll forgive you for being an autist.
>>151778949Don't bother arguing. You'll never win.
OH. MY. GOD!! How come we went from a wholesome plug for a German thing to Famidumbass saying shitty nonsense about Hamtaro. AND DON'T EVEN REPSOND TO ME, FAMICOM, OR ELSE I'LL SHANK YOU!!!
>>151779083No worries, let's just ignore the autist and move on.I love the movie alot because it reminded me of a time where animated movies can be found in lots of different media and it doesn't have to be from a mainstream company to be good. I wish we have good non-Disney/Dreamworks/Sony movie these days.
>>151779083Right?Back to wholesome stuff. Here's ep 1 of the show.Honestly, not very fun. https://youtu.be/DkGL3Th3Zi4After all, it's for tiny babies. The movie is where it's at. But we can discuss the details of it.
