Silly question, but, what is Cashew and Belle about?I feel like this webcomic has lore and world building, but no story. Maybe I haven't found the narrative pages?
I'd like to subscribe to Pre-Teen Magazine
What kind of Loud House is this, then?
Kids shouldn't be models!
Slice of Lifes don't have stories
>>151797720Artist doesn't seem to go into any lore. All I can is what I've gleaned from the comics and non-canon porn scenarios. Squirrels are sapient beings that sorta coexist with humans and Belle's family adopted Cashew at a young age so Belle thinks of him as a brother.
>>151798602SoL does hqve premises and short stories, though. B&C, no matter what I've read, feels like coming in the muddleof an episode.
I think Disney or CN would be interested in animating this to have their own Loud House, but after Primos they're probably very cauteous.
>>151798828TLH had their own brown spinoff and it flopped
>>151798842Even more of a reason for Disney and CN to be cauteous. And that's why Cashew and Belle isn't gonna get an aninated cartoon for kids. That's the only reason I can think of.
>>151798860Really? That's the only reason you can think of?
>>151797720Is this a skinmag?
>>151797824The kind without the blondes. So big downgrade.
>>151798926It has hot squirrels so no
>>151798942>squirrels over cute hot bimbosThis nigga wanna fuck small non anthropomorphic animals lmao
>>151797720see for yourselfhttps://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/112556638
>>151798978Blondes are just albino monkeys
>>151798999So what does that make you, then?
>>151798878>Really? That's the only reason you can think of?Yes.Why? Can you think of another one?
Isn't it porn?
>>151797720FH needs to draw the mom and the toddler lezzing out
>>151797720okay, but what SUPERMAN has to do with it? Please inform me, I am really asking a question here as I am thoroughly clueless about Pre-Teen Magazine, I wasn't pre-teen for a long time. Especially by the recent days' time.
>>151799391>SUPERMAN?
Fun fact about the beach: the beach is fun!
>>151799369Too soon?
ÂżAQOEC?
>>151799044The creator's baraag page.
>>151799686What of it?
>>151799722Oh for fucks sake I'll say it out lod then. It's full of PORN of the characters, drawn by the creator, including but not limited to: belle fucking cashew, the dad fucking belle, the dad fucking the baby, dad fucking cashew, cashew fucking the baby and so on. and if you Google cashew and belle the creator's baraag page comes up on page 1 .
>>151799795Ah, yes. I knew this.But that's what the comic is about. >>151798602If Disney or Cartoon Network makes a series, they're gonna have to expand it into stories. Fantasy cast, everyone? I wanna heart Cree Summer in it.
>>151797720I'm pretty sure this is porn
>>151800266Depends on how you define "pretty sure".
>>151800218>But that's what the comic is about.That's not what the comic is about. But even so, regardless that the porn pieces are non-canon the fact they publicly exist means it would never get a kids cartoon adaptation.
>>151800355>regardless that the porn pieces are non-canonThey are canon, and when they make a cartoon they'll have to take more characters and elements from there, because the porn has more content anyway.>it would never get a kids cartoon adaptation.Yes, as I said, probably not after Primos.I would say that the chances of Cashew and Belle becoming a Disney or CN show are less of 60%
>>151798602Plenty of them have story arcs.
>>151800465>show won't get get picked up because of brown people, not because it has close pornographoc associationYou're intentionally being obtuse. 6/10 troll, annoyed me enough to reply.>they are canonPic related
>>151799795thanks for the tip, I'll be on my way
>>151797720The lh community has to be one of the most depraved yet still wholesome fandoms out there
>>151801024
>>151797720This is loli and not even good loli at that, idk why so many people like his stuff.
>>151800516>the sex stuff is not canonWell then, I stand corrected. I honestly didn't expect that, specially because the sex content is more than the wholesome content.Well, then what you're saying is that the chances of them making it into a cartoon for CN or Disney are of 100%?Because I said before they were at most 60% but that was based on the idea that the lewds were canon. I admit I was wrong about that.I hope you're correct. So, who do we want for the cast of VAs?
>>151801245>the chances of them making it into a cartoon for CN or Disney are of 100%Realistically, at most 90%But yes, the chances are good. Damn good.>>151800516 is correct.
I don't think >>151800516 is saying that the chances of an animated series are 100 percentImply it? Yes, but not saying it.
