Who is better?
Mickey objectivelyBugs could never pull off serious content the way the Mouse can. He cannot pull off comics like Mickey doesMickey is better as an all around player
>>151811654Mickey wonBugs lostDisney would put itself up for sale like Warner Bros did
>>151811654Bugs, Looney Tunes shorts are timeless and still watched by many while Mickey has been reduced to just a corporate mascot and hasn’t had a single good thing the past few decades with the exception of those Paul Rudish shorts.
>>151811654Mickey does not have a personality, idk what these other dumbasses are about
>>151811718Those Paul Rudish shorts are still better than those 2020 Looney Tunes Cartoons
>>151811654Jesus is better than all of those highly satanic cartoons
>>151811738Animation wise, Bugs destroys Mickey easily.
>>151811775The classic Disney shorts had higher animation budgets than classic Looney Tunes did
Bugs has better cartoons and personality but Mickey is bigger for his icon status
Fantasia is better than every single Looney Tunes animation in existenceYou have to be retarded to say Mickey is getting crushed in the animation department by them
>>151811796Yeah but Looney Tunes definitely had far superior cartooning, look at any Rod Scribner-animated scene for example, they do a better job at taking advantage of animation as a medium.
Which is the better subversive 90s short? Runaway Brain or Invasion of the Bunny Snatchers?
>>151811654Nobody actually likes Mickey Mouse. He's a soulless, hollow mascot.Verification (not) required.
>>151811969I like Paul Rudish Mickey
>>151811750Both were trying to be like Ren & Stimpy, Paul Rudish Mickey just succeeded at doing so by actually being funny. This entire short is comedy gold.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uzDOoVEgkig
>>151811654>Who is better?They're both good, but they're no
>>151811758go the fuck to /his/ christcuck faggot
>>151812066He's a comic book character. Doesn't count.
>>151811654Bugs Bunny, obviously.Bugs' cartoons are actually funny, Mickey is only remembered for being the mascot of a megacorporation.
>>151812164Fair
>>151812066Absolutely based.
>>151812066Why couldn’t we have Popeye become Paramounts mascot? Have the Fleischer characters like Popeye, Koko, Bimbo, and Betty Boop become Paramounts equivalent to the Sensational Six or the Looney Tunes
Bugs, easy Mickey is only likeable in fucking Kingdom hearts of all places and even then is still bad
>>151812253Paramount didn’t own Popeye and only held a license to produce his cartoons. It would be strange for a company to use a character they didn’t create or own as their mascot.
>>151812357Nothing was stopping them from making Betty or Koko their mascot though
>>151812836I guess they didn’t think of them as mascot material, and on top of that, they didn’t even own them; Fleischer Studios did.
If this Mickey had evolved properly he might have stood a fighting chance against Bugs. However, he was replaced by a smiling, soulless husk.
>>151813513Paul Rudish Mickey is mentioned a lot in this thread but that Mickeys design looks a lot more fun compared to the soulless Mickey Mouse clubhouse ass modern design, it feels like an ideal evolution, really wish it replaced his modern corporate design.
>>151811654Bugs was always superior and his cartoons are timeless. Mickey is just a brand.
Even with the Rudish stuff, Animated Mickey is still a Potential Man since they refuse to properly adapt his comic book adventures.
>>151811775On opposite day.
I prefer Bugs but I know the reasons why I prefer Bugs are the reasons why Mickey is more popular
>>151811654Bugs in theory, has more fun and freedom being a simple troll and comedian, also enjoys his life beyond represnting his franchise all the time. And always stays ahead of people which makes him a ideal leader to depend on since he actually has the smarts and the vision to achieve success even before it happens.Mickey is just the shy yet optimistic figure who let's his friends lead their own way, and think hes in charge because hes the face of his own company but hes just a mascot made to gain credibility for others that honestly have better lives than him, who's just corporate shill making everything status quo, plus by himself hes boring than a vanilla poptart.
>>151811654I'd say Bugs even after seeing couple of Paul Rudish's recent Mickey Mouse shorts. Mickey's personality seems mostly boring to me as if Disney barred him from having much of a personality. Bugs' personality is way more noticeable through his shtick and antics, which in turn make him the more interesting character out of the two.
>>151811654Bugs Bunny doesn't have his own Mouse of House or Kingdom Heart equivalent, so Mickey wins
