>"i found my moving buddy">woody is right next to herWhat the fuck?
That's the joke
>>151815735You got a friend in her, Woody.
>>151815735Bopeep has no legs She isnt wearing a dress.She is a porcelain accessory to a lamp. Her dress is a large hollow cone. She cannot take the dress off. There is no dress. She does not have legs underneath just her feet at the bottom face of textured ceramic.
>>151816981repulsive
I love how Pixar only made Bo-Peep just to show that Woody was a pimp that had power and was respected. And then Buzz fucks everything up and the joke is that his friends hate him now and he gets cucked. It's so beautiful. I love the 90s so much bros.
>>151816981Huh, you know, that's probably a decently large reason why I disliked that movie. They went from being toys to being little humans.
>>151817056She did her job. Then they needed le epic girl boss and invented jesseThen they needed another le epic girl boss and brought back bo...the porcelain ornament, and apparently just forgot about that. Or didnt care. Or most likely a woman wanted to do it and no one objected.All the girly girls of the before times need to be avenged. Every dress wearing lipstick needs to be turned into a pants wearing dyke and (for some reason) all the men need to act aroused whenever theyre shown up by them.
>>151817102Because the people worming on it simply did not respect the setting. When in the writers room with them you sayi somethi g like>you cant do that. In the first move we established bla bla bla blaAnd they just kick that guy out of the room.
>>1518171025 is about the toys fighting to keep from being exposed.
Why didn't they ever bring her back?
>>151817556They did. As a pants wearing girl boss who is better than all the men at everything.
>>151816981You can put clothes on a porcelain doll.
>>151818022Cool.Bo isnt a porcelain doll. She is an ornament on a lamp.
>>151816981She literally has legs in the first movie. That being said, I hate girlboss Bo Peep
>>151816981That's why I reject thr 4th movie outright. She's porcelain to showcase how delicate and feminine she is. How Woody treasures her. Even the faintest scratch can stain her. She's pure. Apple of his eye. And then here she is a generic everyday girl boss. And then the other prominent character in this movie is some ugly spork thing which felt like LGBT allegory that I am never interested in entertaining.
>>151817126Because it was a hard line. People who insist on hard lines are always the first to go. Because hard lines are established boundaries and those boundaries are in place for a reason. When no one is keeping everyone accountable to a standard then the standard suffers tremendously. Not everything mixes or goes together. That's the first rule of cooking. Follow the formula. Reminds me of all the movies being crapped out by Disney and Pixar that completely fails to make an impact. And how whatever failure is out there has to be consistently gaslit to make it seem like a success. As a guy I never had the werewithal that Disney was solely for girls. I always enjoyed their entertainment because the men were good natured and their character growth was always rewarded with love and family and stability and peace in abundance. From a child I would equate Disney with even the concept of romance in more ways than I realize as I type this. It was the pulling of that element (and if romance wasn't on the itinerary then there was character and bond-building but the BEST stories incorporates both of these elements. Because the absolute best reward I could think to write for a character's ending is another character accepting and reciprocating and supporting and nourishing and growing a unique love they can only be shared and appreciated by one other person. Why else would you, it you had the power, bring a character to life and make them experience a great emotional journey and then give them no one to romantically bond with? Feels pointlessly cruel) and providing no substitute that contributed to Disney's decline and will continue to bring it down for the foreseeable future.
>>151817126You mean like how they established the hard rule that toys can't move around humans unless it is extremely small movements and the toys are all sure that no one is looking, and then the 4th movie had a pair of carnival prizes kicking Buzz in the head over and over while loudly shouting at him in broad daylight in plain sight with kids and parents everywhere?
>>151817105>jesse>le epic girl bossyou're joking right
>>151818546>And then the other prominent character in this movie is some ugly spork thing which felt like LGBT allegory that I am never interested in entertaining.The idea of a hand-made toy gaining whatever equivalent of a soul the other toys have is probably the only genuinely interesting hooks they could have made after TS3 and you have to shove your god damn faggy bullshit politics into it, fuck you
