[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 20251222_021519.jpg (249 KB, 2048x1152)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
Beauty and the Beast and The Hunchback of Notre Dame are both massively overrated. Beauty in particular aged terribly and looks very rough because it is the first Disney feature to go all in on digital paint and ink. Some of the stills look like a bad 90s PC educational game.
>>
>>151819622
Ok, zoomie
>>
>>151819622
Andreas Deja talks a lot of shit about the animation quality in Beauty and the Beast.
It's still a significantly better movie than anything Disney has released in the last 25 years.
>>
I never understood why critics and fans thought The Little Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast were witty or brilliant. And I still don't. The fact people view these movies as anything other than an absolute creative and artistic dead end is really funny.

>instead of actually innovating it's kinda (superficially) like a movie that's older than ww2 woaw!
>>
>>151819823
>instead of actually innovating it's kinda (superficially) like a movie that's older than ww2 woaw!

Is this a complaint about the Cocteau version
>>
>>151819823
Why are you an autistic retard?
>>
>>151819622
You're wrong as shit but that's okay because some people are just born retarded.
>it is the first Disney feature to go all in on digital paint and ink.
That would be Rescuers Down Under.
>>
>>151819645
>Le zoomers
Anyone with a minimal of good taste or basic knowledge in animation knows that the animation quality in Beauty and the Beast is very subpar in many instances, specially with the human characters. The exceptions are musical numbers like Be Our Guest and the Beast himself, except for 2 or 3 sequences. The Little Mermaid, even with some of the budgetary constraints from the damaged, decaying state of 1980s Disney show from time to time in the character design and rough line work, was more consistent in the visual aspect.
>>
>>151819978
Look at the slop from pic related and try to convince yourself that it looks good.
>>
>>151819689
>Andreas Deja talks a lot of shit about the animation quality in Beauty and the Beast
Source?
>>
>>151819689
>It's still a significantly better movie than anything Disney has released in the last 25 years
WRONG
>>
>>151819622
At the very least this one in particular it only last less than ten seconds.

But yeah, it's pretty terrible.
>>
File: 1734649618082.gif (797 KB, 500x277)
797 KB
797 KB GIF
>>151819622
>Beauty and the Beast and The Hunchback of Notre Dame are both massively overrated.
Do you just wake up every day INSISTING on spouting out nonsense?
>>
File: 1444207585913.gif (2.83 MB, 464x392)
2.83 MB
2.83 MB GIF
milkmaid
>>
>>151820107
WHATS HIS NAME



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.