I think there should be
>>151828688It should be the only kind.
>>151828688
>>151828688What would female gaze lesbianism be like
>>151829296Butch
>>151831558erm that wasn't allowed back then
>>151828688Should have been the only kind. But "thry" took over and turned it into a child grooming attack vector and thankfully helped kill the positive lesbisn"TWO GURLS IS TOTES HOT MAN" propaganda. So. Really lesbans are the last thing even the degenerate normie male and hetero female/foid audience wants anymore. If you so much as hint at chicks digging each other everyone knows what to expect and completely tunes out. Just leaving the lgbtqa, total loser jailhoyse gay foids and cuck/agp wierdos.And they not only make up a negligible portion of the audience the vast majority now hates them. They live in tiny protected ideological bubbles and have funding from people who hate all of us and want us dead so they dont fully understand how fucked they are. Look at the AT people. They are 100% fucked in terms of viewership and marketablmility of their product and they have no idea.
>>151828749tsmt
>>151828688>>151828693>>151828745>>151829261>>151829291Sex
Why is Magik so lesbian coded but still hasn't come out?
>>151833815It’s time
As puerile as it may have been, male gaze lesbianism was the only reason anyone ever cared about or sympathized with lesbians. When it was scaled back in favor of more "realistic" lesbianism everyone just completely lost interest in lesbians altogether, which left them without any allies to stick up for them when the trannies showed up a few years later and took over all lesbian spaces both on the internet and offline. So from a purely strategic POV phasing out male gaze lesbianism was a massive mistake.
>>151832153Yeah, they might want to be careful.
>>151829296All lesbianism is female gays.
>>151835568Dykes werent anything special. Nor cared enough about to murder for eating pissy. They were, if not a sexusl novelty of some powerful man, treated with dismissal and disgust and mostly ridicule. >>151834150No. Its not about real lesbians. The amount of lesbos am greet totally deep artistic media was mostly ignored or trested as novelty. It was ehrn they pulled the curtain back and started to openly attack heteronormativity hetero womrn snd men, snd claim female sexual assaulters, rapists and pedophiles like in the vaginas monologues. Then cane the reputation of ledbian relationships are safe and yhe same as het after msm lost its ability to create the jfn are the problem and it's not real narrative. Lesbians as the tool to insert lgbtqa and brainwash people has collapsed entirely.
>>151835655motherfucker, stop fat fingering the keyboard
>girls kissing girls:)>not kissing me:(
>>151835675My fingers much like my cock is far too bulky to be used like a precise instrument
>>151835655what
>>151835675>>151835688>>151835655I speak a little Moron, let me attempt to translate.>No. It's not about real lesbians. The amount of lesbos shown in "great, totally deep" artistic media was mostly ignored or treated as novelty.>It was then [after Pride gained ground?] they pulled the curtain back and started to openly attack heteronormativity, hetero women and men, and claiming female sexual assaulters, rapists and pedophiles, like in the Vaginas Monologues.>Then came the reputation of lesbian relationships as safe and the same as het after MSM lost its ability to create the jfn are the problem and it's not real narrative. [IDK what this nospellingfag is even talking about here; something about abuse rates in lesbian relationships maybe?]>Lesbians as a tool to insert LGBTQA and brainwash people have collapsed entirely.The out-of-control ego and, I assume, fog of booze holds your points back a lot.
