[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Which movie is better?
>>
>>151848496
Back in action is better built as a whole.
Space Jam lacks a middle act. They sort of train, get michael's clothes and then get to the match. They get wrecked by the aliens, and then start winning by comedic gags.
Back in Action has a stronger story as a whole. It's not great or anything, but makes the whole thing feel more complete.
>>
Space Jam could be edited down to 35 minutes and only benefit from it
>>
>>151848655
lol damn
>>
>>151848496
Not even a tough decision
>>
>>151850085
Space Jam, right?
>>
>>151848496
Back in Action. Space Jam has some really fun scenes but they're all limited to the animated segments and a few bits with Michael Jordan being in the animated segments. The live action parts are fucking ASS and take up half of the fucking movie. >>151848655 is completely right.
>>
>>151848496
Who gave a worse performance, Michael Jordan or Steve Martin?
>>
>>151848496
Space Jam is a classic.
>>
>>151852481
Steve Martin because he’s an actual actor and has done good performances before



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.