[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: x1080.jpg (351 KB, 2120x1080)
351 KB
351 KB JPG
Watching this in HD on Boomerang and the line weight looks sooo good in HD, so much better than modern thin line cartoons.
What was ever the justification for killing the art of line thickness? It doesn't look worse in HD if anything it looks better.
Shows like Zim, Shaggy and Scooby Doo Get a Clue, and Duck Dodgers feel like where animation peaked in terms of line variation, it feels like a genuine lost art.
>>
Thin lines are so boring
>>
File: -3F0o3.gif (1.17 MB, 320x218)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB GIF
>>151848737
It gives the overworked Korean animators an easier time when animating modern artless slop
>>
>>151848737
>Zim
That was Nick, not CN
>>
>>151849336
coulda fooled me
>>
I'M GONNA SING THIS SONG ALL DAY LONG
>>
>>151849336
sounded more like he was using zim as an example of shows with line variation rather than saying zim was a show on boomerang



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.