Dude it feels like they had 7 writers on the script and no one was allowed to talk to each other.
>wanted to make their own cinematic universe>flopped from the first filmWhy not start with making a good standalone Scooby-Doo film? Instead of trying to incorporate your other characters so quickly.
>>151924736>Scoob envy
I haven't heard from the Scooby franchise in god knows how long, did Velma kill the franchise or something?
>>151924863Exactly. That should have been How Shaggy met Scooby and his family and how their bond grew.
>>151924863It was so blatant too. Half the movie was setting up sequels, unironically worse than The Mummy.
>>151924863>why not make a plan before blowing all of your investor's money?This kind of thinking is banned from the industry.
>>151924736I think the writers genuinely wanted to make a good Scooby film, but the execs demanded they set up a cinematic universe of Hanna-Barbera characters because that was all the rage back then and they wanted their own, so they had to obey.The clearest sign is that the opening sequence to the throwback music scene was pretty solid Scooby stuff.
>>151925348I wouldn't even give them that much credit because this film had no idea what to do with the rest of Mystery Inc. It's literally a Blue Falcon movie ft Scooby Doo
>>151924863Every successful cinematic universe started with just one character, made movies about other characters, then had a movie where they meet. Every failed one tried to introduce an entire universe of characters all in the first movie. Then you have the DCEU which was somewhere in the middle, and it lasted a while but was very clumsy and had a lot of misfires.
This thread smells like Sharkfag
