>Entertainment journalist Jeff Sneider said Sebastian Stan playing Harvey Dent is an "open secret," and said that he's heard from sources that Dent’s wife Gilda Gold, played by Scarlett Johansson, would have a bigger role than Dent in the film. Sneider and co-host John Rocha later speculated this could mean we may see Gilda as a female Two-Face.>If writer/director Matt Reeves is planning to loosely adapt ‘The Long Halloween’ storyline (and he has said the movie will feature a villain not utilized on screen before), then he could be focusing on Gilda as she attempts to lighten her husband's caseload by killing Gotham’s crime bosses, which ultimately leads to his – or maybe her – disfiguration and the birth of one of Batman’s greatest enemies.https://comicbookmovie.com/batman/the-batman-2/the-batman-part-ii-may-focus-more-on-gilda-dent-than-harvey-dent-could-we-see-a-female-two-face-a225884
I have woke fatigue.
>>152064018What's woke about this? It even happened in the comics.
>>152064277It does feel a bit.. gimmicky? I think they're trying to avoid a retread of Aaron Eckhart's portrayal and just don't really know how to since he was a perfect "realistic" take on the character
>>152064336depends which version they use>The right side was the basis of the villain in the Catwoman movie
>Villain is evil because they have suffered severe emotional trauma and lost the ability to make decisions, outsourcing it to coin flips
How about we just don't do Two-Face again?
>>152064439He is well-known and has an easy to depict gimmick.
>Two Face and Joker>serious, gritty Batman>againReeves is a hack
>>152064006>long Halloweenit literally needs nowhere, why are they so fucking obsessed with it?
>>152064277>It even happened in the comics.As if the comics haven't been woke garbage for decades now.
>>152064617>it literally needs nowhere
>>152064508So he's safe. I'm so tired of them doing safe villains. Fuckin do Man-Bat. Firefly. Magpie. Mad Hatter. Ventriloquist. A serious Mr. Freeze or Ivy. At least Clayface is getting some attention.
>>152064734Firefly seems exceptionally easy to do in a realistic setting. A dude with a flamethrower, maybe a clumsy but effective Jetpack if we’re feeling a little crazy.
>>152064745Yeah, totally. He could be one of those start of the movie villains that is beaten quickly but sets up the plot or something
this would not surprise me, these movies have a self-imposed shadow from the Nolan movies they feel the need to set themselves apart from. I wouldn't be surprised if they think Two-face has been done already so they need to do him differently
>>152064277>It even happened in the comics.>It happened in a fucking Flashpoint sequel.>From two years ago.Uh-huh.
>>152064006the popped up collar still looks fucking stupid
>>152064006So, smash or pass?
>>152064734>>152064745Firefly was meant to be the villain of the Batgirl film played by Brendan Fraser
>>152064277Man shut the hell up.
>>152065285Johns did it before that in Earth One.
>>152064006If they’re going for female Two-Face why not that politician from the first film? You know, the one whose opponent was killed by the Riddler—she had this unspoken vibe where her niceness seemed like a front, but maybe they want someone with a lot of name recognition.
>>152064712Damn that bruce timm two face design is still peak
>>152064006Ok now this is awesome. Its about time there is a female Two Face.
>>152067152"Woman is evil because she is disfigured" is horribly overused.
>>152065745Which is a major source of inspiration for the ReevesVerse.
>>152064277That's not how that works fag, it's lke saying She-Hulk is good kino tv cuz it happened in a comic, da fuck are you talking about
>>152064006So the earth 2 thing but replacing sister with wife?
>>152064006This would be terrible and I'll tell you why: everything else aside as soon as you let them make a race/sex swapped character they try to make it the permanent version of the character. Take for example that The Little Mermaid cartoon is now going to have a black Ariel, and Nick Fury can not be White under any circumstances anymore. They always say: "what's the big deal? It's just one movie!" but it's not one movie. It's you saying that you're permanently erasing the character we like from existence and replacing them with a crappy knockoff that no one likes. The only thing you can do is respond with hostility and tefuse ti engage with it.
>>152064277Gilda Dent was first introduced in 1942. Did this happen in 2022 (80 years later and after everyone had died except for a fat tranny who wanted to erase the original character from existence?)
>>152064617Because they don't read coics and just get a short list of "well known" comics that are actually just a B.S. P.R. list the editor at the time made to sell the latest trade paperbacks that has been circulated ever since. No one goes: "Oh hey, y'know theres some really neat stuff from the Denny O'Neil/Neil Adams years." or "let me show you some of the original five years of Batman stories" or "did you ever check out the old serials? They're to die for!" it always "well, after we threw out all the good stories we made up a bunch of new ones and, trust us, those are EVERYONE'S favorites."
>>152064734Maxie Zeus would be pretty rad. Clock King would kick butt. Old school femme fatal Ivy with no mention of dykeness would be cool. There's a lot of options. Honestly Batman vs the Ninja would be cool, too
>>152065051Hollywood people don't want to do anything new they want to copy what's been done before then have everyone act like they did something new
>>152067162They'll say it's stunning and brave until it comes out then once it's made all its money the same people will say it's sexist and "deeply misogynistic" then demand Reeves be reolaced by a black woman and the series become about Ivy and Harley being queers.
