Does /co/ agree with this?
>>152112012Fixed version
>>152112012It's Cartman for the 90s. Pick one of the ATHF characters for the 2000s. The bomb scare alone is more important than some robot people only remember for the porn. Finn is a good pick for 2010s.
>>152112188this resonates with me more
>>152112188South Park is too American you can't put it near the fucking simpsons in term of influence
>>152112188I’d put Bart in the 90s and He-Man in the 80s.Move Bugs to the 40s and make 30s Popeye. I think the original image was bait made by a Tiny Toons schizo.
>>152112012Porn isn't influence
>>152112012Now watch this. I give him 5 seconds. 4. 3. 2. Cue Famicom.
>>152112188Why do people pretend Simpsons was an 80s thing when the show began in the fall of 89? The mainstay of Simpsons popularity was the 90s. Really 91 to 98 or so when it began falling off, and other competition started popping up. I really don't see why closely adhering to a date on a wiki article about the first episode airdate having much to do with the era when a show was popular. It was popular as a 90s phenomenon. Most shows are ignored for the first season or two anyway before the popularity really starts rolling in.
>>152112012I don't know who your 1950s and 2000s characters are.
Why don't people put more respect on his name? There were no screwball cartoon characters before him.
>>152112012>>152112188>Bart >80sTracy Ulman Simpsons didn't have that level of cultural influences.
>>152112012whos the 2020?kpop demon huntersskidibi toilet pomnicharile from hazbin hotel
>>15211568550s is Hcukleberry Hoound and 2000's is Jenny from My Life as a Teenage Robot, you probably saw the latter in porn on the internet.
>>152112012>>152112188I really can't think there is a single character that dominates a whole decade like that anyway. Somethings are really popular for like 2-3 years and then replaced by something else. 80s in particular. it's really hard to hammer down a single character that speaks for the whole decade. Shit came and went too damn fast. It's more like Papa Smurf for 80-81, He-Man for 84ish, Slimer in 87', and maybe Alf around 88-89. And some stuff was really huge for a time and then immediately buried fast as if it was nothing at all, but it was everywhere for a few years. Alf having 3 simultaneous shows and then nothing is a huge example.Same with the 2010s, Finn works for 2010-2013 but then everyone mostly stopped caring about Adventure Time. Elsa was way more popular as a globally viewed animated character after that. By the end of the decade it was all things Marvel. No single character speaks for a while decade like this since no one ever really stays on top for too long.
>>152115678>>152115698The series began in the 80s. Bart Simpsons is an 80s character who's popularity ultimately rests in that same decade.
>>152115698You have no idea what you are talking about. The Tracy Ullman show has been proven to be one of the most watched tv series in the 1980s and one of the top grossing series for Fox.
>1920sFelix, Oswald, Mickey>1930sPopeye, Daffy (if you're gonna shill Porky because he came first then you have to shill Bosko)>1940sBugs, Donald/Goofy, Tom & Jerry>1950sGerald McBoing-Boing, Tom & Jerry>1960sFlintstones (and HB slop)>1970sScooby-Doo>1980sTransformers, Inspector Gadget, anti-drug PSAs>1990sThe Simpsons, Pink and The Brain, Beavis & Butthead, Pokemon>2000sSpongeBob, Ed Edd n Eddy, Powerpuff Girls>2010sAdventure Time, Steven Universe, Rick & Morty>2020sInvincible, Smiling Friends might join/overtake it
>>152115896>no TMNT>no He-Man
>>152115775>>152115806The Simpsons on their own didn't become a massive powerhouse until their first solo season.
>>152115930I was really scratching my head for the 1980s crap. Just couldn't picture a pecking order in my minds eye, does anyone have ratings on hand?
>>152116008I was there, He-Man was way more important than Inspector Gadget.
>>152115961Factually incorrect. Simpsons was a massively popular series on the Tracy Ullman show years before the pilot was made. This is the core reason why Fox decided to expand the shorts into a full series.
>>152116074State your age
>>152116065I'll take your word for it but >>152114206 makes a valid point, I don't think He-Man was big outside of America.
>2010sWe all know who really is.
>>152116135He-man is very popular in Europe, the toyline was a massive success here
>>152116176Comparing how many languages each Wikipedia page for the series has>He-Man and the Masters of the Universe>21 languages>Inspector Gadget>31 languages
>>152116176Yeah they didn't even air the cartoon, only made some VHS compilations. The action figures were popular and held on until replaced by Turtles.
>>152112012The Simpsons were more of a '90s icon and you know it.
The Simpsons was a big hit in the '80s but it doesn't remotely compare to the cultural monster it became in the '90s. The comedy sections in bookstores basically became The Simpsons, they were everywhere in advertising, and Fox could slap them on any merchandise and it'd sell. The only thing in animation during thay era that really came close to that was TMNT and even it didn't have the cross generational appeal the Simpsons had.
>>152116143Chowder was more of a 2000s cartoon.
I’d get rid of Buster Bunny, a middling Bug Bunny clone is nothing compared to the cultural power of SpongeBob or Pikachu. He’ll, I’d argue Lola Bunny had a bigger impact thanks to Space Jam.
>>152117340Factually incorrect. The Simpsons had years of success before it was spun off to its own series in the 1989.
>>152118959>The Simpsons had years of success Just three.
>>152112012Replace Finn with the Minions
