In a medieval kingdom there lived a prince, who was madly in love with a neighboring country's princess. Unfortunately for him, she did not love him back. So the prince went to the princess' father, the king, and asked him for his daughter's hand in marriage. The king knew that his daughter did not love the prince, but the law of the land stated that any eligible prince could marry his daughter. Bound by law, the king granted the request, and the prince and princess were wed.On the eve of the wedding the prince tried to consumate their marriage. But the princess did not want him, and was afraid, so she fled the castle. She ran into a nearby field, passing by signs warning her of dangerous animals in the area, however there was also the Joker fooling around, the bull saw the Joker pestering the Princess, charged and raped him.Of the four characters in the story: Prince, Princess, King, Bull. who is the most responsible for the Joker's rape, and who is the least responsible? and why hasn't Batman done it yet?
>>152132700This is actually tough. At first I'm thinking I don't know what you meant by him "pestering" her and I'm tempted to say if the Joker was trying to rape her then it's his own fault. But like, why does it matter what the Joker's intentions were? Hypothetically whether he was trying to rape her or if he was just annoying her, it doesn't change how much his own fault it was because the bull still rapes him just as much in both situations. If he was trying to rape her it makes it feel like it was fate or karma but I guess it wasn't. So I think we can really only blame the Bull here. I mean yeah he's an animal, but everything everyone else did leading up to this point was just butterfly effect shit. I think you're trying to trick us by having most of the different characters be assholes in different ways so that we're thinking of who the meanest person was. But that has no bearing on cause and effect. The Bull chose to rape the Joker, and he could have chosen to rape anybody in any situation. He probably has too, many times in the past. If you can't blame an animal, then it's nobody's fault really.
>>152133178Oh and you can't say it's the princess's fault for ignoring the signs. The Joker was already in the area. Well idk tho. Like would the Bull have raped him if she didn't show up? If the answer is no you can say she chose to enter the area knowing there was a dangerous animal that might do something bad as a reaction to her being there. However by that logic it means the Bull was definitely always a rapist anyway, meaning Joker would have gotten raped anyway somehow. Something he did would have set the Bull off at some point right?
>>152132700Btw is this an actual brain teaser riddle thing?
>>152132700Batman's fault for not raping the king.
>>152132700Gordon sure loves his morning brew
>>152132700Batman wants Joker’s consent first
