Would Cruella have grounds to sue Roger over his diss track about her?
>>152140314No, because nobody likes her.
>>152140314It doesn't really fall under defamation. The only part that could really be damning is when he says "she ought to be locked up and never released". But that can easily be written off as satirical. Since the premise of the song is more about her being a monster, that lyric is more referring to a dangerous creature being caged rather than a human going to prison.
>>152140314No, it falls under protected speech and it's his personal opinion about her
Well they're in England, so Roger would probably get arrested.
>>152140331Not true, anon. She is my waifu.
>>152140314She did but you know British Goverment
I love her...
