[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hq720.jpg (62 KB, 686x386)
62 KB
62 KB JPG
>kills Disney TVA theatrical films in your path

Nothing personal bro
>>
The fact they made a Teacher's Pet movie and put it in theaters is a wild decision. Was the show even that popular? I feel it would've made a lot more sense for them to do a Kim Possible movie or something.
>>
>>152189154
The artstyle tripped me up.
>>
>>152189154
>DuckTales the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp
>A Goofy Movie
I'd say worthy of the big screen, but runs a bit too short
>The Tigger Movie
>Return to Never Land
Straight to home video-tier, meh.
>Doug's 1st Movie
>Recess: School's Out
>Teacher's Pet
TV Movie-tier, should be no where near the cinemas. What were they thinking? What were they drinking?
>>
>>152189154
This shit was 100% an inside job excuse for them to get rid of their 2D team and go all in on CGI
Nobody in their right mind would ever think Teacher's Pet: The Movie would ever make any money
>>
>>152189708
The show's crew thought a movie was a gold idea, enough that they began work on it around the time the show got the greenlit. The more bizarre thing is the high ups giving the greenlight on a theatrical movie after the show didn't do so hot apparently because of a case of sunk cost fallacy, yet barely marketing it, shifting the release date to the last minute, and using the failure as the justification to never do a TV show adaptation for theaters again.
>>
>>152189243
In all honesty, throughout the lifespan of the show. It wasn't really popular to begin with, not helping the fact that the film was developed when the crew just finished the pilot or first episode as the execs hoped that the show would peak in some popularity like the rest of the then-current shows at that time, but it fell flat.

The film took about three years to complete and by the time Disney debuted the film in early 2004, the show ended it's run in mid 2002. And in the end, this became a scrapegoat as to why DTVAs like Phineas and Ferb, Kim Possible, Gravity Falls or even possible Big City Greens would never get or see a theatrical release.
>>
>>152191089

Phineas not getting a theatrical movie is still wild.
>>
>>152191089
>the film was developed when the crew just finished the pilot
Weird. I never knew that. Waa Teacher's Pet the only show-to-movie pipeline that did that?
>>
>>152189672

Doug was oroginally for Home Video but a retarded Disney exc thought it was a good idea to make it a theatrical movie after the sucess of The Rugrats Movie.

You can see it in the final film with that weird ass aspect ratio who looked off in theaters
>>
>>152189243

Pepper Ann would made more sense, she also has a movie planned but it got scrapped for some reason.
>>
>>152191347
So much of it was just Disney execs jealous of Nickelodeon. Stay in your fucking lane.
>>
>>152191445

Nickelodeon only thrived within the theatrical market, CN and Disney Channel dropped out after their first flops.

However it's only Spongebob and Paw Patrol who keep getting films even something like The Loud House had it's films be label as streaming content.
>>
>>152189154
>multibillion-dollar too big to fail Disney killed 2D because of that movie
No, folks. 3D was just more profitable. For a brief period at the height of Network cartoons, movies could be released frequently, and this relationship helped extend 2D cinema in the West. But then Shrek happened, and they just couldn't keep the bubble going.
>>
>>152191601
That's what I meant. Nickelodeon was successful on TV and can justify a theatrical film based on a TV property. The expectations for Disney are entirely different, and success happened in reverse - you have an original theatrical film like Aladdin or Hercules or Tarzan or whatever, and you give them an animated series. Doug and Teachers Pet should never have gotten films, ever. To do so is opposite of the Disney brand and business strategy.
>>
Taylor St. Clair playing a retarded girl reading a Teacher's Pet-centric issue of Disney Adventures in the 2000 adult film Ass Clowns.
>>
>>152191791
You just know
>>
>>152191791
That's great man.
>>
>>152191791
Coincidentally "Teacher's Pet" and "Ass Clowns" are both double-meaning titles.
>>
>>152191748
>Doug and Teachers Pet should never have gotten films.

Only difference is Doug was rather mid and still has some popularity, while not as similar to that of The Rugrats or Ren and Stimpy, but was rather remembered as a nickelodeon show than a disney one. Teacher's Pet on the other hand, wasn't and not at least.

>>152191791
Wow.
>>
>>152191791
Wild pull, anon.
>>
>>152189154
I remember seeing the trailer for this in theaters when I was 10 or 11 and being surprised that this show of all things got a real movie when there were much better Disney shows to choose from
>>
>>152189154
Did anyone else hate this show? It wasn't just the art style what was horrible but the human boy was so fucking annoying. He was always going on about how a dog must be a dog and he was envious his dog actually had intelligence and talent. And in the finale when his dog truly became human he was at his most insufferable about the whole he being a dog.

I just wanted the dog to realize he's intelligent and skilled and decides to abandon that annoying twerp of a boy who only got in his way all the dam time. Especially since he did become a real human he can actually be independent.
>>
>>152189708
>This shit was 100% an inside job excuse for them to get rid of their 2D team and go all in on CGI
I tought it was Treasure Planet, with Disney doing a poor marketing campaign to justify their transition to CGI
>>
>>152189708
How? Princess and the Frog and Winnie the Pooh (2011) came out years later
>>
>>152189243
Gary Baseman was a big deal in the late 90s/early 2000s. Making Teachers Pet into a movie was all about getting that Cranium money
>>
>>152189672
>Doug's 1st Movie
why did they call it this? did they really expect to make more?
>>
>>152189154
But I liked it.
>>
>>152192588
Bob Iger only ever greenlit those to win favor with Roy and Diane Disney since bringing 2D animation back was one of the big talking points of Roy Disney's "Save Disney" movement that ousted Eisner and resulted in Bob Iger gaining his power. Same reason why they got Oswald back and did fuck all with him outside Epic Mickey.
>>
>>152189708
>>152189154
Weren't the creators/writers of the show involved in one of the first non-Pixar Toy Story 3 drafts?
>>
>>152189154
this show was really fucking ugly in a very fascinating way. i remember watching it just because of that
>>
>>152189154
The songs from this movie had no right being as good as they were.
>>
>>152189243
They greenlit the movie the same time the show was greenlit.
>>
>>152191791
>Read about the scene
>Intellectplay
Welp.
New fetish, I fucking guess.
>>
>>152192743
I just like Nathan Lane. It's weird to me that he had starring role in a shitty nothing cartoon.
>>
File: Cranium-coasters.jpg (156 KB, 612x665)
156 KB
156 KB JPG
>>152189388
OK this keeps bugging the shit out of me. Is this the same artist who did the artwork for the board game Cranium?

I can't be the only one who sees it, right?

RIGHT?!
>>
>>152192743
>>152192799
Meant to quote you to this too
>>
>>152192603
I know Cranium is a best-selling board game, but was Gary Baseman really a "big deal"? Back then his art was niche and mostly popular among indie/underground circles, and I doubt people liked Cranium because the art alone, let alone go watch a cartoon/film because it shared art with a board game
>>
>>152192799
Nah it was him I'm sure he did the art for Airbourne too.
Which was created by a Math Teacher.
>>
>>152189154
I don't know how this became as popular as it did. The art style and character designs for this show were horrible. For me, the only good part of this show were the backup singers on the theme song.
>>
File: file.png (3.44 MB, 2048x2048)
3.44 MB
3.44 MB PNG
>>152192966
>I'm sure he did the art for Airbourne too
holy shit i've seen the packaging plenty of times before but now... NOW... I will never see it the same again

HOW FAR DOES THE RABBITHOLE GO, ANON?!
>>
>>152193034
Who is this genius math teacher?
Is he the man on the cover???
>>
>>152193068
If you look closely, he's seemingly holding a pencil in his hand. Grading homework on the plane?!
>>
>>152192997
I remember watching this on One Saturday Morning when I was 8 and 9. This was a "I watched it because it was on" show, when Recess and the good Fox cartoons like Digimon and Godzilla were already over.

One great thing about living in a post-basic cable world; I no longer have to waste time with garbage because I had the rare privilege of watching cartoons once a week.
>>
>>152192799
his name is Gary Baseman

>Cranium
Fuck this stupid game btw. As a kid I got it two separate times as a birthday present. It's fucking boring shit. I had three little brothers. You think the fucking clay for Creative Cat is gonna stay in the box for very long with those little shits running around, throwing their feces everywhere? Fuck no.
>>
>>152193102
WTFFF I HATE HOMEWORK NOW??????
>>
>>152193034
>>152193068
>>152193102
>>152193211
>>152193345
Teacher's Pet........ Airborne created by a school teacher.........
hold the fuck on
hold the FUCKING phone
there is a conspiracy and I can just smell it. SOMEONE PUT THE PIECES TOGETHER
>>
>>152192997
Show wasn't really popular period. The artstyle was one thing, the plot and the characters come off as either predictable at best but weak and uninteresting at worst. I mean, it felt more like that dog is no more than just Nathan Lane's self insert fursona that can larp off as a human kid that can magnet all of the attention away from Leonard that makes him like some angry cuck.
>>
>>152193372
We NEED an infograph, /pol/ ain't got nothing on this fucking rabbit hole.
>>
File: Bluey-Movie-promo.png (91 KB, 1000x563)
91 KB
91 KB PNG
>>152191089

> And in the end, this became a scrapegoat as to why DTVAs like Phineas and Ferb, Kim Possible, Gravity Falls or even possible Big City Greens would never get or see a theatrical release.

Ironically their next big theatrical movie based on a TV show is for a show they don't even own
>>
File: grumblesons.png (854 KB, 1031x853)
854 KB
854 KB PNG
>>152189154
I don't think it's fair to pin all the blame on Teacher's Pet. They tried their best to make a movie work, and I'd say they succeeded. That soundtrack is killer. Def one of my personal fav TV-to-film adaptations



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.