[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: large-5353080.jpg (96 KB, 600x923)
96 KB
96 KB JPG
Is Watters' Nightwing actually good or are people just overrating it because it's not Taylor's?
>>
>>152931078
It feels more like the latter. It's like a return to Dixon/Devin Grayson's Nightwing but not in a good way. It's perhaps a bit better written than those, but going back to Blüdhaven being supposedly worse than Gotham and the wannabe Daredevil aesthetics just bore me.
>>
>>152931078
Book's great. Other poster is a retard who obviously hasn't read fuck all from the series. Nightwing finally has some actual colorful villains of his own to fight, the panelling is top-tier and the art is some of the best at DC right now. And Watters really seems to get Nightwing—his voice is spot on. Also, Babs a cute in this one. It's some of the best Nightwing in well over a decade, for sure.
>>
>>152931078
It's pretty meh honestly. You can tell Watters wishes he had been assigned an actual Batman book.
>>
>>152931078
Dick Grayson is shit. The only time he was good was when he was Batman.
>>
christ you faggots are insufferably miserable

none of you like ANYTHING
>>
>>152933949
I like good comics, but fuck these sales gimmick characters. Dark Patterns was decent.
>>
>>152931078
havent read it
>>
>>152933949
Why are you spamming this?
>>
>>152933949
The only thing worse than a person bitching, is a person that bitches about the bitching.
>>
>>152931078
Taylor's run sux tho
>>
>>152938215
True, but that should be irrelevant.
>>
It's pretty good. The gang shit was the worst part as it was fairly generic but he kinda dropped it half way through the arc as it seemed to mostly serve as a backstory/reason for Nightwing Prime. I really liked Olivia and am hoping Watters can bring her back somehow.

The new arc started off better than the Zanni arc and Cowan's art fits the tone a lot more than Onions's art did so I'm hoping it'll get better like the first arc did
>>
>>152931078
The first 2-3 issues were mediocre but the writing picked up once the supernatural and horror shit became the main focus. Though unfortunately while his art wasn't bad by any means and he did some horror elements just fine S*y's really didn't fit the book that well like it would a pure action book.
>>
>>152931124
>going back to Blüdhaven being supposedly worse than Gotham and the wannabe Daredevil aesthetics just bore me.

That's... that's literally what the character is about. You might as well say you don't like Nightwing.
>>
>>152931124
Other than Bludhaven and Babs being in the book it's nothing like Dixon or Devin's runs.
>>
File: nightwing sidekick.jpg (290 KB, 1008x1304)
290 KB
290 KB JPG
>>152931078
Bryce is cute!
>>
>>152931078
>modern mainline DC
Almost certainly the latter.
>>
>>152933949
There is like two or three good writers in the entirety of American comics right now.
>>
>>152940058
The character overall existed for over 50 years before they tried to turn him into a knockoff Daredevil running around in a dull city. Him being stuck in Bludhaven will always just come across as a Daredevil-lite.
>>
Ever since Batman and Robin got cancelled this mid title has become the best mainline Bat-book. How fucking sad is that?

>Comic books are back, everybody!
>>
>>152931078
its woke and full of white men bashing, sexist feminist double standard and white male emasculation to make women look tough,
so naturally it gets good reviews and zero sales
Pretty much every storyline features Dick getting rescued, beaten up or ordrered around by woman, he never rescsues any female heroes however. Also he constantly gets drawn half naked but zero female skin shown ever. Also all jokes are at the expense of him or other white guys
>>
>>152940006
Opposite. It has decent street level and then it went capeshit retard because can't deal with complex shit like murdering children and emotional nuance. Dropped ball.
>>
>>152940458
There are actually none right now.
>>
File: GYsTkuiXAAAVSlP.jpg (155 KB, 1200x675)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
>>
File: s-l1200.jpg (227 KB, 791x1200)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
>>152931078
As someone who picked up the book during the Taylor stuff having read the Dixon run, I think I'm in the minority in saying the Taylor stuff was great. Flawed for sure, but it was a needed step since Dick hadn't had a note worthy run in a hot minute.

As for Watters run, I really dig it. It's clear Watters is taking inspiration from the Dixon run in terms of tone and has mastered Dick's voice very well. I'm also digging the newer stuff that's flashing out Bludhaven's lore. Giving us a great idea of the city's history and adding to the mythology. Art has also been great Sook did a great job and Cowan did a great job on his first issue.

Overall, yeah I'd say it's worth it.
>>
>>152931078
It’s been terrible. The new gangs are dumb and bringing a Superman version of Dick to the book and then writing him off like that was lame as fuck.
>>
Does anyone give a shit about Bludhaven's lore? Seeley tried to do that with making it some whaling or fishing city which had no real connection to Dick and felt off. Like there is no narrative connection between a fishing city and Dick as a character. That would make more sense for Aquaman or something.
>>
They write Dick like a limp dick wuss. Taylor and Waters. There must be some memo at DC where Dick isn't allowed to engage in anything sexual unless a female character basically takes Dick's clothes off for him.
>>
>>152941180
What's great about Taylor's run.
>>
>>152931078
No, it's bad, and unfunny. And now with bad art too.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.