Looking back do you think it could’ve worked or was it doomed from the start?
>>152992300>Looking back do you think it could’ve worked or was it doomed from the start?the second one
>>152992307then how the disney and nickelodeon variants of this won harder? is it marketing power?
>>152992383Nickelodeon got its start as a live action channel, and Disney was always about variety programming. Cartoon Network was a CARTOON station for CARTOONS. Why would you try to take the CARTOONS out of the CARTOON station?It was dead on arrival. Shows like DBD could have succeeded on literally any other network (helps that Andrew WK is basically a live action cartoon person), but it did not belong on a network that, since its inception, marketed itself as a CARTOON Network.
>>152992403OK so let me try to think about this at least for Out of Jimmy's head and Level up.What if jimmy's head BUT it will be a mixture of Osmosis Jones and Inside Out with some grain of Wimpy kid?For level up it can be a combination of Game shakers and Aaron Stone?The incredible crew could work if it was more like Mighty Med in my opinion so it can be the crossover backbone so it can be connected to level up with the bulshit multiverse nonsense.I am actually trying to develop my own co about this but i am poor and will need much more time but i am always thinking of this https://youtu.be/qxrk1XWqfu4?si=cFfFI9PNmRyo0DW4
>>152992300It's literally called CARTOON Network, anon. Do those look like Cartoons to you???
>>152992300>do you think it could’ve workedIf those shows appealed to girls then maybe
>>152992300Doomed, these shows weren’t even bad. But it’s Cartoon Network
>>152992300If CN really tried and stuck to it, which would have had a better chance of bringing longterm success for the channel; live action for tween or preschool content?
