[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (2.25 MB, 1200x923)
2.25 MB
2.25 MB PNG
I liked Tomasi's work at DC, is his Ghost Machine stuff worth reading? Is any of Ghost Machine worth checking out?
>>
Anybody?
>>
Sorry op, didn't read it, I heard are not as good as his work on dc
anyway, is sad that Tomassi never had a proper main GL or batman run, would have been better than some of what we got( Thorne/PJK and Chip/Tinyon)
>>
>>153010578
>I heard are not as good as his work on dc
That's unfortunate.
>>
File: whos-who-1985-v01.jpg (227 KB, 800x599)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
Not to derail the thread but I found out about DC's Who Who series a little while ago and man, the art might be even more soulful and well done than Marvel's handbook. Though I have a feeling it does not have the same level of technical autism because DC has more fantastical stuff and Mark Gruenwald wasn't in charge of it. Haven't read it so I can't say if it was better.
>>
>>153011937
I partly also like it more from an art perspective given obvious tailor-made art/spreads that were given to characters as well as almost every character receiving their own logo from their book or characters who never had their own logo, receiving one. Plus the details of their backstory and feats being shown in a simplified style in the background is better than the static poses in Marvel's handbook.
>>
>>153009575
why do you need other people's opinions to tell you what is worth reading? Or are you a shill? If you liked his other stuff just check out the new stuff and see if you like it ?
>>
>>153011937
Just make a new thread.
>>
>>153012043
imagine being this mad over an innocuous thread.
>>
>>153009575
The only thing from this image I've read is Hornsby & Halo, which is... okay I guess? Not great, not terrible, just kind of meh.
It's mostly carried by its premise, which is simple but effective. An angel gets raised by shitty humans and a demon gets raised by good humans. Shenanigans ensue as they discover their powers, while supernatural forces want to meddle with the experiment for various reasons.
>>
>>153012044
Ok. Might do that later. Or maybe not. Kinda just want to read stuff.
>>
>>153012160
I read a bit of this one. Extemely boring, which makes it terrible.
>>
>>153013675
Damn, I'm sorry to hear that...
>>
>>153009575
Trash



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.