[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Better or worse than Shrek?
>>
Better in terms of storytelling but I like Shrek a little bit more. Haven't watched either in ages, though.
>>
I'm saying better mainly because I really like the factory/corporate aesthetic mixed with the Monster stuff.
>>
Not that fair of a comparison. Monsters Inc was Pixar's fourth time making a movie, while Shrek was PDI' second time making a movie (after Antz)
>>
>>153054417
monsters university is unironically really great tho
>>
>>153054417
It being so original while nailing its execution makes it better. Shrek is actually not that interesting, at least nowadays.
>>
>>153054417
Better than 1 worse than 2
>>
>>153054417
Monsters inc didnt ruin a whole generation of cartoon movies
>>
About on the same level, but I like Monsters, Inc. more.
>>
Did anyone watch the sequel show?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.