[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why is BFDI and most object shows considered "childish"? Adults on 4chan enjoy things made for younger audiences like Sonic, Mario, Pokemon, Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, Disney, Pixar, etc and no one calls them out. but when someone says they're a object show fan in this board, they're immediately suspected of being underage. Why is this? I don't get it.
>>
File: images (22).jpg (6 KB, 258x195)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
I watch it but just look at it, it doesn't have a Carl to make it mature
>>
>>153105812
>ATHF is mature because it has Carl
>>
>>153105798
It’s literally just for eyes with stick arms on them. Having characters personify and be named after common objects is a trope almost exclusively found in kids media, and the show has no unique artistic flare if I’m being completely honest
>>
>>153106305
Just eyes*
And when anons talk about children shows, it’s usually through nostalgia or finding the characters hot
>>
>>153106321
>Through nostalgia or finding the characters hot
That's it? What about the concepts of those shows?
BFDI is also nostalgic to those who grew up in the 2010s
>>
>>153107104
>What about the concepts of those shows?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qileP4bAzek
>>
File: 15 vis 15.png (735 KB, 2402x1440)
735 KB
735 KB PNG
I'm sharing pic related while I continue to wait for my gijinka request, lol.
>>153105798
>considered "childish"
Low stakes, geometric character design, bright colors, especially having hyperactive contestants.
>no one calls them out
You give them too much credit since the insult to their perceived maturity is just water on a raincoat going under the bridge to them. That's why liking sonic and sonic OCs are "weird" and the term Nintendo Adult and Disney Adult are seen almost always in the derogative.
>object fans are immediately suspected of being underage
Same reason regarding "considered childish" above, being in the internet, just need some thicker skin, or better yet, hope other mature object show enthusiasts find their way here and constructively discuss their critique and/or appreciation of the objects, the nature of the contests, and the premise of object shows in general.
>>
>Sonic, Mario, Pokemon, Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon, Disney, Pixar, etc
All of those things are decades old at this point, meanwhile Object Shows have been popular for what, the last decade? So the people who grew up with it are most likely to be from the younger generations.
>>
>>153105798
I tried watching this after I heard the Brothers Chaps did a cameo, but I don't understand it whatsoever. It has decent enough presentation, but the content feels like it was autocompleted. There's no substance to it, no humor.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.