[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1739390064326.jpg (9 KB, 249x249)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>443 days until Shrek 5
>>
File: 20260413_145630.jpg (2.98 MB, 3060x3772)
2.98 MB
2.98 MB JPG
>>153222466
The Shrekoning is already upon us, friend.
>>
More like Dreck 5
>>
>>153222506
wow that’s really fucking funny dude. awesome you can make up rhymes about Shrek that’s so fucking creative. do you actually have any actual fucking criticism or are you only capable of effortless shitposting? I’d like to hear one reason why Shrek is supposedly “dreck,” literally can you come up with even one thing to back up your claim? what have you made in your life? billions of people love Shrek all around the world and none of them seem to think it’s “dreck.” I bet you think you’re really fucking clever but you’re not. maybe think before you post.
>>
People don't want to see Shrek as a washed up old man with children. It's the same thing as Indiana Jones and Star Wars, except in animation you don't have to make the characters old. It's especially confusing because you just had that Puss in Boots movie from a few years ago and none of the characters were suddenly older.
>>
>>153222466
ok



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.