[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1776430658007744.png (458 KB, 805x498)
458 KB
458 KB PNG
Is the söysmirk the new Dreamworks face?
>>
>>153273863
More like the Disney face.
>>
Onions grin if you ask me.
A goylem that is afraid to disappoint.
>>
>>153273863
If by "new" you mean "been around for several decades," then yes.
>>
>>153273863
I still don't understand how the art direction for Onward was approved. These giant jew noses are appaling. The random mermaids in the opening sequence were looking like crack whores. Why Disney/Pixar is so opposed to the idea of having good looking humans whenever they don't do princess movies? Even Soul was extremely uncanny with main guy's head being strange pear shaped with tiny eyes



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.