This is the funniest shit ever according to boomers.
I dunno, they're a little chuckleworthy
>>153340763>cartoon animal gets crushed by an anvilFunny>cartoon girl talks about her feelings with another cartoon girl and the plot is about which girl she's going to be very good friends with because Disney will cancel the show if they out right talk about being lesbianBoring
According to Tiny Toons and Animaniacs writers*
>>153340763>boomers90s faggots are boomers now?
>>153340763big heavy, big whump. ha!you no know big heavy? you never gone out to big world, touch real things? only small flat pretend world in hands?
>>153340763It's funny because an anvil falling on you in real life would kill you. So it works in a cartoon because it doesn't actually kill the cartoon character, they will just but squashed flat and injured but in a cartoony way.
>>153340763>This is the funniest shit ever according to boomers/gen X-ers that have never seen a golden age cartoon and think this was the only joke they used>in other words Animaniacs creatorsftfy
This is the funniest shit ever according to zoomers
>>153341423Cuphead was the only golden age throwback that understood the era it was paying tribute to
>>153340763>>153341148>>153341423This episode of I am Weasel sums it up perfectly, which I actually think was specifically mocking shit like Tiny Toons and other Ruegger-shit
>>153340763I bet most people don't even know why anvils are shaped the way they are.
>>153341627Well. Tell the class then, mister welder
Why did an anvil hanging by a rope enter the public consciousness?Pianos and safes I understand. they had to get those up to multi story apartments. But who was lifting anvils?
>>153340847>I dunno, they're a little chuckleworthybecause you're a infant.
>>153341600it was absolutely a Tiny Toons parody. the Weasel Babies song is almost note-for-note and line-for-line the Tiny Toons theme, same melody and everything
>piano falls on top of someone >they come out the piano's top with its keys for teeth
Kids today don't even know how to use an anvil. Probably grew up in a home that didn't own one.
>>153341900Of course. If you get hit in the head by a piano, your teeth turn into piano teeth. So if you get hit in the head by a skull, your teeth go back to being normal teeth!
>>153340763The actual looney tunes didn't even rely on them that much.
>>153340763You're wrong OP. Now if that anvil had ACME written on it, that would be the funniest thing ever.
Millennials nominated this for 55 Emmy awards
>>153341900>still laughs at dead joke that's been used in literally almost everythingtime for me to become a hollywood writer, it can't be that hard
>>153342252"Anvil humor" is the type of shit millennials laugh at too, most of them grew up with animaniacs
>>153340763And Gen X.And Millennials.>>153341148No, fact.>>153341423No, everyone.>>153341476Tiny Toons and Animaniacs did so as well.The Wuzzles, Gummi Bears, DuckTales, The New Adventures of Winnie the Pooh, Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers, Tale Spin, Darkwing Duck and Bonkers if you're Disney.Really anything that came out of TMS/Telecom, Startoons and Disney Japan/Australia during the 80s and 90s.>>153341657The Japanese.>>153341874Muppet Babies, not Tiny Toons as that was a different beast.>>153341986They do, anvils are timeless.
>>153340763Piano > Safe > Bath Tub > Flower Pot > Multiple Bowling Balls > Anvil > Singular Bowling Ball
>>153341600>>153340763https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vXDaFF54es
>>153341194why do so many faggots consider looney tunes to be a 90's kid cartoon
>>153342153Exactly, fucking this, this is what I don't get about Animaniacs and other classic cartoon "love-letters" of its ilk.
>>153342336This shit was barely in Looney Tunes, retard. You're basically thinking of Tiny Toons/Animaniacs
>>153342304End your life.
>>153342356No, Animaniacs knew what it was doing.
>>153342336Because Cartoon Network went live in the 90's with a massive backlog of classic cartoons in a way that was never done before. Right when a lot of kids born at the tail end of the 80's were developing cognizance.So you have a bunch of 5-10 year olds watching these cartoons for the very first time in arranged, organized, thematically assembled blocks for 24 hours.The Tex Avery Show theme song, to this day, still occasionally tumbles about my mind.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tw3zWL3Vr20
>>153342304>Muppet Babies, not Tiny Toons as that was a different beast.I literally just explained why it was clearly intended as a Tiny toons parody. I'm sorry you're too retarded to understand
>>153342369I wasn't even talking about anvils. 90's faggots tend to consider the flintstones and looney tunes as 90's kid shows
>>153342390>Nuh uh because I sayCompelling fucking argument, sir.
>>153342414No you did not, touch grass and seek help.>>153342418They don't, 90s kids know about the ultra deep history of Looney Tunes that go back to 1929's Bosko The Talk Ink Kid pilot and they know The Flintstones is a 60s cartoon.
>>153342442No, it's because Animaniacs as ran by people who had direct ties with Studio Ghibli (mainly Kazuhide Tomonaga and Atsuko Tanaka, the later ended up at Ghibli itself by 2002).
>>153341600This entire episode is straight up just Charlie Adler being passive aggressive about the 90s WB cartoons because of years-long jealousy and drama when he was not asked to voice Yakko while his co-star in Tiny Toons was brought back to voice Dot
>>153342478>No you did notI did. Just because you're too stubborn to listen to logic doesn't mean I didn't.
>>153342502>No, it's because Animaniacs as ran by people who had direct ties with Studio Ghibli (mainly KazuhidePlease explain why I should give a fuck about that
>Famicom is already hereWhat the fuck
>>153342506I had no idea Charlie Adler was the creator/showrunner/writer of I Am Weasel, but I don't really give a shit about behind the scenes drama
>>153340763Hard as diamonds over this
>>153342511No, you didn't, you just remembered the wrong show because you were ultra young at the time.>>153341600>>153342506The only thing Tiny Toons related in that segment was a off the cuff remark about Buster Bunny, otherwise it was unrelated.
>>153342596He's lying.>>153342550Because they were animation royalty, thats why.
>>153342620>No, you didn'tI did. Keep coping.
>>153342502Oh yeahhh I remember that part in My Neighbor Totoro where Mei bashes Sasuke's head in with an anvil. Comedy gold!
>>153342662No, you didn't.>>153342681Bias Atsuko Tanaka.
>>153342653>Because they were animation royalty, thats why.Ghibli has no connection to classic Looney Tunes. Your reasoning is beneath me.
>>153342688Cope.
>>153342694Yes it does, Tiny Toons and Animaniacs is that connection.>>153342714No, this isn't cope.
>>153342304>Muppet Babies, not Tiny Toons as that was a different beast.what fucking part of muppet babies has a bunch of anvils and other shit falling on people? you have extreme psychosis
>>153342933He was just talking about a song in the segment.
>>153342865>Yes it does, Tiny Toons and Animaniacs is that connection.I'm referring to connections to the classic Termite Terrace, which Ghibli does not have. Leave your house and engage with reality for once.>No, this isn't cope.Cope.
>>153342956>He was just talking about a song in the segment.Which the song was making fun of... and so was the rest of the short... that's what the entire thing was supposed to be
>>153342983No you did not as you were talking about Tiny Toons and Animaniacs, also not cope, we had this discussion before.
>>153342418Well, the reason for that is simple, Cartoon Network used to play a ton of Looney Tunes reruns. Whole blocks of channel time were dedicated to it.
>>153343036Not the case, you're delulu, seek help.
>>153343060Kids knew that Looney Toons were from 1930-1969, even back then.
>>153343047>No you did not as you were talking about Tiny Toons and AnimaniacsWe were talking about Looney Tunes.>also not copeCope.
>>153343066Look if you can't see that the entire thing is clearly parodying stuff like Tiny Toons, i don't know what to tell you other than to just accept reality
>>153342620>Them making a remark about Buster bunny was totally an accident and not meant to be taken as a jab at all!!
>>153343126No you were not, also theres no coping here, I'm posting facts.>>153343154I WATCHED THE DAMN SEGMENT!!!! Wessel Babies is a take on Muppet Babies, we been through this before.>>153343188That is the case.
>>153343318>No you were not>>153342153>I WATCHED THE DAMN SEGMENT!!!!Cool, a spergout>Wessel Babies is a take on Muppet Babies, we been through this before.The whole segment was a spoof of Tiny Toons.>That is the case.The Buster Bunny comment was specifically about recycling jokes. You lack media literacy.
>>153343465That isn't a spergout, normies do that all the time.That Muppet Babies parody segment was just a a bit in a segment, not the while thing.>The Buster Bunny comment..No it wasn't, it was a off handed comment that was off the cuff.
>>153342327Based. That said, the physical comedy was rarely the good part of Animaniacs.
>>153343522Yes it was, Toshihiko Masuda made sure of it.
>>153343521You will never be a normie
>>153343521>That Muppet Babies parody segment was just a a bit in a segment, not the while thing.Even disregarding the Weasel Babies spoof, Tiny Toons has literally everything the rest of the segment is making fun of.>No it wasn't, it was a off handed comment that was off the cuff.Not the case, you're delulu, seek help. Also, cope.
>>153343521>No it wasn't, it was a off handed comment that was off the cuff.It fucking was. The point of entire cartoon is about recycling shit
>>153340763Holeeeey shieet I don't know about you guys but I feel the urge to burst into uncontrollable laughter swelling up.
>>153343570I AM A NORMIE!!!!>>153343602No it does not, you're delulu, seek help.There is no cope because it's unrelated.DON'T YOU EVER DISRESPECT GHIBLI ROYALTY SHUCH AS THOSE FROM TELECOM ANIMATION FILM (TMS) WHO GHIBLI USED REGULARLY!!!!!
>>153343633No it wasn't, we been through this before.
>>153343521>>153343681>No it wasn't, it was a off handed comment that was off the cuff.>expects me to believe that they put buster's name there for literally no reason
>>153343664You're not a normie, man
>>153343664
>>153341600That's a great episode, thanks for sharing anon. Crazy how it's still pretty relevant with spumcotards
>>153343775>Crazy how it's still pretty relevant with spumcotardsThere's not a single anvil joke or pie-in-the-face gag in Ren and Stimpy or anything spumco adjacent, if anything that's exactly the kind of shit John was criticizing
>>153343563recycled scripts
>>153343720That was the case.>>153343729Yes I am.>>153343830>>153343775Not the case.The segment was great, there is that.
>>153343874You're creeping out the normies
>>153343871They were not, they were original.
>>153343830>>153343874I didn't say Ren and Stimpy specifically, I was saying retards who are influenced by spumco cartoony stuff but in a superficial way.
>>153343874>That was the case.You're fucking retarded, dude.>Not the case.Name five. better yet, name one.
>>153343907Recycled.
>>153343895Not the case.
>>153343940You're the retard here.>>153343963Not recycled.
>>153343997>Can't name oneSad, retard
>>153341900>coconut falls on top someone's head
>>153343997Recycled. Cope.
>>153340763That was actually invented by Tiny Toons, so Gen X. They made a show about teaching cartoon comedy without understanding it, so they talked about surface level elements that aren’t funny without a comedic framework making it funny in the cartoon.
>>153340763>character eats a corn cob>typewriter soundskino
>>153344089>That was actually invented by Tiny Toonsthey just overused it
>>153341900>they play a little jingle when they fall out of his mouth
>>153343874>That was the case.prove it was.
>>153344060No, not the case.>>153344089Q-Taro the Ghost (the 1965 version) invented the modern use of it and Tensai Bakabon (the 1971 version) enhanced it, Tiny Toons just carried their touches.There were also Popeye cartoons that had anvils as well.>>153344139No, they used it just right.
>>153344236>No, not the case.Yes, your shit was more recycled than ren and stimpy. Cope.
>>153340763nope, it's rakes
>>153343980Yes the case.
>>153344310No it wasn't.>>153344393No it isn't, we been through this before.
>>153344417>we been through this before.Not the case.
>>153344417>No it wasn't.Yes, animaniacs and tiny toons had anvils and pie splats out the ass, and ren and stimpy, not a one
>>153344447Yes it is.>>153344475Cartoons are supposed to have anvils and pie splats, not doing so means your IP belongs in live action.
>>153344658>Cartoons are supposed to have anvils and pie splatsNot the case.
>>153344730Yes the case, case in point.
>>153344658>not doing so means your IP belongs in live action.Ghibli has no falling anvils and pie face gags in their films
>>153344764This has nothing to do with anything and you are mentally unwell.
>>153344776Yes it does.
>>153344785It does not and you can't explain how it does.
>>153344089>They made a show about teaching cartoon comedy without understanding it, so they talked about surface level elements that aren’t funny without a comedic framework making it funny in the cartoon.can you elaborate on that, sounds really interesting
>>153344844Yes it does, cartoons are supposed to have anvils as if you don't use anvils you do it in live action.Simple as that.>>153344862He's lying, Tiny Toons knew what it was talking about because the crew behind both Tiny Toons and Animaniacs were trained by Hayao Miyazaki before he left Telecom to do Nausicaa at Topcraft, which of course led to the finding of Studio Ghibli.
>>153345053I love the bit in Nausicaa where she does the Kennedy kick dance after saving her village
>>153345053>Yes it does, cartoons are supposed to have anvils as if you don't use anvils you do it in live action.That does not explain how your image has any relevance to this topic. Does Hamtaro have jokes about anvils?
>>153345146Laura's spin off does.
>>153345195Forgot picture.
>>153345195Post name and a clip.
>>153345195>>153345242
This is the funniest shit ever according to silentoomers.
>>153345428This short is actually kinda funny, they should sneak it onto one of the new Blu-rays with a warning
>>153345491Put it in as an easter egg and if anyone discovers it, say it was an accidental inclusion
>>153345567No, far from it.
>>153345662Stop replying to me
>>153340763>saw a road barricade with the word "ACME" and nearly lost my shit
Droopy had good shithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1WR_epIB_o
>>153340763Yes, cartoon violence is funny.
>>153342311Also Clothes Irons
>>153342714>>153342865>>153342983>>153343047>>153343126>They can't breathe thoArrest.
>>153348611Sneed
>>153348611Arrest yourself.
>>153340763I don't think this bomb design was ever real
>>153340763Yeah, so WHAT?
>>153351177That's what grenades looked like in the 19th Century. It's appropriate that they they persist in cartoons because that design likely seeped into popular culture due to political cartoonists of the time using them in a Kelly kind of way:>here is an idea I find dangerous>I have depicted it as a grenade
>>153353096it's still funny that it's persisted for so long despite it not not actually looking like anything anyone has ever seen in real life. hell, the fact that its round is why they made it in to an item in Crash Team Racing as their version of the green koopa shell
what the hell happened to this thread?
>>153353192Famicom the TMS obsessed literal autist shitposter, see 153342304 for his first post. If you're not familiar with him become familiar, it will save you a lot of time learning to never engage with him. His most obvious tells are posting replies along the lines of>no, not the case>no, it's a factwhile refusing to elaborate. I'm almost certain he has actual theory of mind deficiency, which means arguing with him is the equivalent of trying to engage in rational debate with a toddler.
>>153351177if you grew up with fireworks you could associate it with cherry bombs as they follow the same design structure(fuse that leads directly to explosive ball)
>>153353332Normies say those things, plus that wasn't a Famicom post.
>>153353096Fascinating...
>>153353813You will never be a normie
>>153353813>that wasn't a Famicom post.why are you speaking in the third person Famicom
>>153353813>plus that wasn't a Famicom post....and how would you know?
