[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>causes Katzenberg to completely give up on 2D animation
>>
>>
It grossed 26 million domestically
>>
>For you personally, what was the last great piece of animation that you saw, both from a technical and a storytelling point of view?
>Ouch. Okay. Umm... You caught me. I've got to do some thinking now! I wasn't prepared to think! Well, first of all, let me say that I am not an animation buff, per se – I like specific animation, but most of it bores me. Not that I don't think it's well done. And I don't see that much. So starting with that, the fish picture – Finding Nemo, is that it? I thought that was very well done, and a good use of computer animation because of the inanimate objects, being fish, and I thought that story was OK. It was good for a family film, or younger. So I thought that was very well done, as far as a film goes. I saw a lot of bad ones I don't want to bring up, like Sinbad and the horse picture, and some other things
Ralph Bakshi interview from 2004
>>
>>153391386
Always wondered what Bakshi's process for writing a story was.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.