[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 3.jpg (103 KB, 1920x1080)
103 KB JPG
>this made boomers literally piss and shit their pants
>>
>>153417393
You’ve never kissed a girl
>>
>>153417398
all the girls are boys
>>
>>153417393
I still think this episode/segment is excellent.
>>
>>153417393
I'm guessing you're too young to have watched the twilight zone original where a 3d person gets stuck in a 4d realm.
>>
>>153417479
>most THOH episodes are just "Twilight Zone already dunnit"
Grim.
>>
Why is so much modern discourse just
>Can you believe people liked thing?!
with no further commentary or criticism?
>>
>>153417479
late zoomers just can't comprehend how fast 3D animation improved in just a decade
>>
I specifically did not like the Simpsons, but still remember this being a big deal at the time. So yeah. What of it?
>>
>>153417393
I got a lot of nightmares from it
>>
Post better looking 3D TV animation from the same year or before then
>>
>>153417691
Fag
>>
>>153417479
This is a troll, right?
Or otherwise it's an Outer Limits I don't remember because I remember every Twilight Zone and I don't remember anything like that
>>
Feels like I'm just wasting money standing here!
>>
>>153417393
>"Ooh, erotic cakes."
>>
>>153417770
Are you just mad that this was essentially TV history?
>>
This thread on /tv/ has more posts.
>>
File: 1741655258727.jpg (46 KB, 1125x541)
46 KB JPG
>>153417393
This was animated by Pacific Data Images, who shortly after became the first CGI division of DreamWorks (they did all the animation of Antz and Shrek)
>>
>>153417393
>old thing bad
>new thing good
>consume product, goy
Well, Judaism is pretty old, so that means
>NOT LIKE THAT, GOYIM!!!
>>
File: buzzed.png (80 KB, 225x225)
80 KB PNG
>>153417393
Shit posting aside, I find it funny how boomers vehemently hate CGI animation and dick suck traditional animation despite the fact their generation (paired with some silent gens) were the ones that made most of those CG animations back in the 1980s and 1990s. Sorta like their milennials and older gen z off spring. The created them, and they hate them. Every article from boomers shit on the millennials and the zoomers they conceived.
>>
>>153418771
it's not that we hate it; toy story is universally beloved. it's that the medium keeps being used to make worse shit instead of doing something novel.
>>
>>153418771
>And yet you participate in an animation industry that uses 3DCG!
>>
>>153418771
Baby Boomer irony knows no bounds, more news at 11.
>>
No, noone cared that the Simpsons had an episode that included 3D. They marketed it as a big deal. That's not the same thing.

Well, I guess in America people just believe whatever they are told so maybe it is.
>>
File: 1682320715678.jpg (80 KB, 566x749)
80 KB JPG
>>153417393
It's a damn miracle the next Simpsons movie won't be CG.

Hell, it's a miracle that FIRST one wasn't CG, too! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB7VF980cEA
>>
>>153417779
"Little Girl Lost"
>>
Did anyone see the movie Tron?
>>
>>153417393
>Little zoomtard lived in an era where technology has been at a plateau for long the very idea of a shift in it is alien to him.
Sad
>>
>>153420276
No.
>>
>>153418838
You sound like the type of normaltard to unironically believe directors who say their movies have "no CGI."
>>
>>153417393
CG stuff was some amazing novelty in the 80s and to the mid 90s. It didn't have to look good, the fact that it looked different from everything else made it interesting to look at.
>>
>>153418771
They hate everything Fox News tells them they are supposed to hate.

They were really into online shopping for 20 years too until Fox News pundits started screaming about the war on brick and mortar stores. Then it turned into a political stance to buy something from Amazon.
>>
>>153419561
I'm kind of surprised there has been no Flintstones-styled live action Simpsons movie by now. Seems like that should have happened by 1997 or so.
>>
>>153420276
No.
>>
>>153420766
The Flintstones cartoon first aired in September 30, 1960.
The live action Flintstones movie came out in
May 27, 1994.
It took 33 years, 7 months, 3 weeks, and 6 days to have live actors,
So, realistically a live action Simpsons movie should come out in, 17 August 2023.
2 years, 8 months, 1 week, and 3 days ago.

LET IT END ALREADY.
>>
>>153417393
Do you mean literal actual boomers or, "people older than 30?"
>>
>>153417393
why do we have /v/ threads now?
>>
File: file.png (618 KB, 943x720)
618 KB PNG
For me, it was the flesh eating air that leaked in through the windows. That shit fucked me up as a kid.
>>
>>153420276
No.
>>
>>153417488
>start to watch older media
>"Hey wait, the Simpsons just ripped this off? And did it WORSE?"
Imagine going from from ripping off the Twilight Zone to ripping off Twilight.

I think I hate their theft of "To Serve Man" the most because they put a liberal "Trust literal strangers else be condemned forever" twist on it that ruins the entire point of the original story AND it was a Lisa episode AND a Lisa-ruins-everything episode.

>>153417779
It's a 1:1. I'm not sure if the Simpsons writers lampshaded how weird it is to call in a theoretical physicist for a real problem or if they too just brought Frink in because the Twilight Zone did it.

>>153418771
>"it's all the zillennials fault!"
>look closer
>executives, writers, artists: boomer + gen X
>look at credits when millennials took over
>executives are still the oldguard
>workers all have foreign names, not even hispanic
Same as /v/ with their worship of Gaben the ultimate fuck you got mine boomer.
>>
>>153421758
It was also the era of studios just doing that kind of thing since by the mid 90s there was also a Boris and Natasha movie, Dudley Doright movie, George of the Jungle movie, 101 Dalmations movie, Casper movie, Dennis the Menace movie, Mr Magoo movie, Inspector Gadget movie, Madeline movie, three TMNT movies, and a Sabrina the teenage witch movie with tv spinoff.

The 90s was the time when they were making as many live adaptations of cartoons as possible. Simpsons seems like a fit

But no go ahead and sperg the fuck out with autistic numbers and act like you have a point.
>>
>>153419561
>get a real studio to animate a great 3D segment if you ignore the static grass
>properly animate moe really well

>film segment starts
>cheap 3D render or trace
>vehicle and objects rendered on 1s
>homah rendered mostly on 2s, with terrible lip sync, and looks constantly weird, either as a disconnect from the 3D objects in which he inhabits or because it looks like a Simpsons videogame render
>zero impact animation, he's either impacted the elbow/fork or hasn't, "Rock and Hard Place" impacts are hidden to save animating them at all
How sad
>>
>>153423515
And they had $70 million to work with. Either it's shit outsourcing or they spent most of it on Tom Hanks's cameo.
>>
>>153423356
>Get old
>Start noticing how that one cool sci-fi episode of *insert literally any show here* was just a rip-off of a Star Trek episode/Dune/Star Wars all along
>Meanwhile, the fantasy episode is a rip-off of Lord of the Rings/D&D
Just like Games Workshop kek
>>
>>153420276
No
>>
>>153424471
Retard
>>
>>153422871
>9 year old me sees this
>"AAAAAGGGHHHHHHhey how can Marge's hair have veins and stuffHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!"
>>
>>153420276
Yes. I mean no.
>>
>>153420276
Yes
......no, wait, no, I didnt.
>>
>>153424471
I don't know if I wish GW would continue to rip off proven properties
Their current imagination is terrible but current culture and its chosen/astroturfed properties are also terrible
>>
>>153418771
I’m not a boomer and I hate CGI because it looks soulless
>>
>>153417479
>retard believes non-anglos watched the toilet zone
>>
>>153417393
Guys!!!
Sneed lol
>>
>>153425195
Ok boomer.
>>
Has anyone else noticed that Gen Z often shits on landmarks from previous generations while never providing examples of anything that they found innovative that came out in their own lifetimes whatsoever? It's constantly one-way shitting and if you really corner them about it they'll never actually try to provide an example. Kind of weird innit?
>>
>>153426384
Zoomers have had no great art created for them in their lifetime, just regurgitated gen x IP and the worst mobile slop you could possibly imagine. Glitch being pretty good has been a godsend for them, at least.
>>
computers used to seem like magic
back then most people had probably barely interacted with any kind of computer beyond an ATM. kids used word processors and spreadsheets at school, and beyond that youd probably just think of warehouse sized computers in a scifi movie
to think those machines could spit out a cartoon, man that was something

were there computer enthusiasts back then? yeah. but they were a very small minority of nerds playing on c64s and amigas
>>
>>153425729
Ok zoomer
>>
>>153417770
Sperg
>>
>>153424657
Newfag
>>
>>153426384
Gen Z is consciously aware that they're growing up in a pretty uninteresting era culturally and so lash out at previous generations about it, while simultaneously incorporating that same older culture into their own because they don't really have much consistency.
>>
>>153417393
I'm a millennial this Treehouse of Horror has always been the scariest one to me, ever since I was a kid. There's just something off about 3d animation from the time, I get a similar feeling from anything low budget 3d from the time, like Reboot.
>>
>>153418771
I hate cgi because films don't have practical effects anymore and Godzilla isn't a rubber suit.
>>
File: Spoiler Image (455 KB, 760x997)
455 KB
455 KB JPG
>>153427972
Boo!
>>
>>153418771
Just because they are of the same generation doesn't mean shit. The boomer who hates CGI is not the same person who pionereed it.
>>153426384
Maybe we could say this is a style of trolling made by zoomers. But again, it's pretty terrible to put all of Gen Z under the same bus when you have plenty who like stuff before their time. Or even a subsection, of dedicated fans who appreciate such milestones and the context.
>>
>>153427972
pussy
>>
>>153417647
Because they're used to Twitter, where there's a word limit, and being short and confrontational is the best path to easy engagement.
>>
>>153419561
>second movie comes out next year
>Still not even one cricket of a rumor about its plot or any potential leaks
>>
File: seconds.jpg (323 KB, 2400x3000)
323 KB JPG
>>153431347
I'd just like to know who's writing and directing. Disney owes us that much.
>>
>>153431787
The only thing known is that they're doing edgier humor this time based off promo posters
>>
>>153418771
>every boomer is the same
20 years from now the industry is just gonna be ai wranglers making ai movies, because that's where the industry and its wages went. But this generation hates AI. It's the same principle.
>>
>>153431799
What promo posters?
>>
File: 1765164621839.jpg (94 KB, 1080x1350)
94 KB JPG
>>153432589
Anon's talking about this one, it's the only other official teaser art we've got so far. Just feels weird to have blood front and center like that
>>
File: wrecking ball homer.jpg (137 KB, 1920x798)
137 KB JPG
>>153423515
>with terrible lip sync
That's just your typical awkward trailer edits to try and mix the funniest line with the most striking visuals to fit in the allotted ad time
>>
File: 1449119807115.jpg (7 KB, 263x191)
7 KB JPG
>>153417393
Want to know how I know that you know nothing about what people did when they saw that episode?

Who let this zygote have internet access?
>>
>>153417398
no one that comments on 30yo cartoons kissed anyone let alone a human
>>
File: image-w1280.jpg (349 KB, 1280x720)
349 KB JPG
>>153417393
So many Antz people worked on that Simpsons segment



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.