I'm the best
>>153427455>I'm the best AROUND NOTHIN'S GONNA EVER TAKE ME DOWN
>>153427455based grug
>>153427455there is at what you do?
>>153427455Why was Bugs chosen to represent Golden Age animation and not Mickey?
>>153427455Just be yourself
>>153430357Bugs is hotter
>>153430357Mickey's far too soft
>>153427455The funny thing is that, at his time, Grug really was the best. Since there wasn't anyone else to compare him to.
>>153427455>art tools gradually becoming more and more soulless Shameful...
>>153427455do people still believe in cave painting hoaxes?
>>153432697Hoax? You're not about to claim evidence of humans existing before 4000 BCE has to be hoax because nothing existing that far back or something, right?
>>153427455He probably was the best in his times, honestly.
>>153429989>>153431783Where is this 'Grug' name coming from, fellas?
>>153427455Grug knew his shit>>153431783He probably compared his work to his subject matter, nature itself.>Imagine going out into the bush, not to hunt, but to simply observe to improve the quality of the l likenesses you make
>>153434896It's Basque
>>153427455I want one of these for Animation where the quality improves as you go back in time and the last one is just Winsor McCay.
>>153432792NTA, but isn't it odd how a region as populated as France only discovered these drawings in 1940? No Celt ever stumbled upon it? No Roman documented it? No French king had their attention brought to it?Not saying the Earth is only 6000 years old or whatever, but something smells fishy.
>>153435267Archeology is kind of a modern habit.The pre modern opinion on caves was "Don't go down there that's probably where Hell is".
>>153435267Dude, romans and celts may have documented it at some point but we only have like a couple first hand sources on roman writings and almost nothing of what the celts wrote down. Hell, we are still discovering new shit that Leibniz wrote and the dude was from the 17th century. You first need to find some account, and the you need someone who can read it, and this someone needs to be willing to do it. There arent many people like that for roman and celt stuff.
>>153435267>No Celt ever stumbled upon it?Celtic religion was more anti-cthonic than Christianity.>No Roman documented it?You vastly overestimate how much Romans cared about minutiae of their subjects. Everything they document is, in context, strategic analysis for conquest and/or assimilation.>No French king had their attention brought to it?Who the fuck would waste the king's time over a fucking cave drawing?Stop being such a hylic.
>>153434896The croods apparently, or at least thats where it got popular IIRC
>>153436531>hylicIs this the new sharty buzzword or something? Not the first time I've read it in this site.
>>153432792Of course, and all you have to do is look at the comments people who claim otherwise make. There never fair and partial observers, they're always vocal bad actors who's number one priority is to besmirch Christianity with "scientific pursuit" just being a means to an end for them.
>>153435361> Jacob's well has been preserved for 4,000> Absalom's place has been preserved for 2,000> Nobody ever thought things were important until like 1960 or something.Doubt.
>>153436702Probably, they love gnosticism as baby's first front for baal.
>>153436702>Is this the new sharty buzzword or something?t. natural slave>>153436888>EVERYTHING IS LE BAALYou cede so much of your heritage to the jews simply because you are terrified to know the truth.
>>153436859That's not the kind of thing I mean
>>153435267So for Lascaux specifically a tree that had been blocking the entrance had been uprooted and some kid and his dog went down to take a look.He went and told his buddies and they took a look and then they all went and told the local Abbot and he went and took a look.
>>153436859It's one thing to preserve religious sites your people care about. It's another to give a shit about something from another culture you stumbled upon one day.
>>153435267That's not even the region and year in which cave paintings started to take notice
>>153427455Inspiring...
>>153427455There should be another panel with a pink-haired obese brown troon with a nose ring drawing Finn, and saying "I fucking suck ass and I don't even care"
>>153427455
>>153432792>BCE
>>153441448Yes, it stands for "Before Common Era" which is a perfectly valid term. Personally I'd prefer to scrap that and say we're in the year 57 AML, considering that is an actual important event to count from.
>>153427455funny story about people seething about ai art.. unless its from a cave man on a cave its all slop and fake art. saved also. enjoy slop of op and me and not cave man true art.
>>153441902Using BCE is like saying cardinal directions are for retards then using a compass that says SNORTH
>>153442116Not that guy but that's not even a remotely accurate analogy.>>153441902>57 AMLUnless we're measuring time in Angry Mommy Latinas, I have no idea what that means.
>>153427455That 20th century animator's chair looks very uncomfortable..
>>153442000The left leg is wrongEnjoy terrible things, terrible thing enjoyer
BCE and CE might be the epitome of lazy modernization because it stills uses the same event (the birth of Jesus) to divide eras as the BC/AD system. Like, at least Fahrenheit/Celsius are measured differently.>>15344220757 years ago was 1969, so it probably means “After Moon Landing”.
>>153441902>>153442207>>153443317I'd argue that the dawn of powered flight is really what separated eras, so I propose Before Elevated Wright Brothers, or BEWB for short.
>>153435267Documentation cost resources which was reserved for the history and affairs of one's nation. Archeology was not really a practice for ancient cultures. At best, they and people of the medieval era might preserve something they knew for a fact was of great importance, such as statues, war memorabilia, literature, other manmade objects that could be easily identified as belonging to a civilization and transported for safekeeping. They were not as concerned with mundane daily use things like fabric, clothes, old farming tools, etc. Things that were so simple and vague in their appearance, even a skilled medieval historian may not immediately recognize an ancient hammer and possibly suspect it was just a makeshift hammer that had been left out in the elements for decades. I mean, if you were a historian in 800AD scouting the deserts of Egypt and saw pic related, would you immediately jump to this being an Egyptian artifact from thousands of years ago or just an old hammer that had been left out by someone possibly recently? If you were there trying to collect artifacts for preservation purposes (And again, this would be considered luxurious spending by anyone willing to fund it, much like now), you would definitely prioritize stuff within tombs or old palaces that had royal markings on it and not peasant tools like plows or hammers.Also, in the case of some cave paintings, we have no idea what the conditions looked like hundreds of years ago. Were they flooded or inaccessible through any other means? Maybe some random guys stumbled upon it while spelunking in 1700AD, what are they gonna do? Who would they know who to tell, or why wouldn't they just think it was random cave art done by someone recently? Anthropology and archeology were not as ingrained in the subconscious as it is now unless it was blatantly obvious, like Greek statues or Roman shields. Maybe people were already accustomed to seeing that stuff anyway since they were living in its ruins.
>>153440640get it
>>153442207>>57 AML>Unless we're measuring time in Angry Mommy Latinas, I have no idea what that means.After Moon Landing?
>>153430357Because nobody fucking likes Mickey Mouse.
>>153444980Not even MINNIE Mouse?
>>153445552bike cuck?
>>153427455As your skills improve, so do your insecurities :(
>>153445552Never listen to your Enlightment Era ancestor he's a big wet blanket
