[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 175803295890235.jpg (168 KB, 958x620)
168 KB JPG
weird, they've already made a lot of sequels with stories that weren't worth telling. Do they suddenly have standards now?
>>
>>153439052
no or else they'd cancel the fucking remake
>>
>>153439052
The Grimm Brothers did not write a part two, so there is nothing steal for a 2. movie.
>>
>>153439052
She loses her hair for some reason
>>
>>153439231
I thought they did?
>>
>>153439425
And then the literal second Lilo & Stitch did good they announced revived production. Literally just because money from another remake changed their minds.
>>
>>153439052
Animating the hair was probably too hard for the jeet army to do and it's now lost technology.
>>
>>153439052
Rapunzel is so hot
>>
File: 1627308868449.gif (1.97 MB, 400x400)
1.97 MB GIF
>>153439052
>Laughs in more sequels
ok but for real I'm sorry Punziebros, she deserves better
>>
>>153439052
When was the plan cancelled? And was it cancelled before or after Zachary Levi got the soft blacklist?
>>
The Tangled series is the sequel though
>>
>>153439052
Fake and gay news.

Nice Try
>>
>>153440083
that's a good thing
>>
>>153440083
why would anyone ever gloat about getting sequels or any form of new content in the modern day when it's always shit and bad. anyone who actually likes anything should be glad when something is simply at peace with its past existence. it's bad enough we have a live action remake coming. at least that's seperate and not an actual sequel.
>>
>>153439251
>implying the original story and Tangled 1 are related at all
>implying the original story is relevant at all
They could turn the show's plot into a movie, since that was already a sequel.
>>
>>153439052
The "worth telling" part is what bothers me. I don't think it means "good", it probably means shit more like relevant modern topics to parody/praise, race relations to hamfist into a kids movie, and random people's life stories to turn into totally-not-biographies.
Them diverting to a Tangled 2 implies they still think people only watch sequels and remakes these days, and believe that's why nobody watches original movies anymore (nobody watches them because they're ass.)
>>
>>153439052
They know damn well a Tangled sequel would flop like a fish, especially after this long.
>>
>>153439052
She already got down from her tower. She got a haircut. The hag is dead. What else is left to do? This doesn't feel like Aladdin or Frozen where it's easy to just keep putting the characters in new magic scenarios.
>>
>>153439052
No straight white princesses for you goyim
>>
>>153439052
Yeah what story is there to tell? Flynn struggling to fit in with noble society now that he's married to a princess? Finding himself missing the thrills of being a thief? Ruining their relationship for drama?
>>
>>153439052
We already had a series that they also fumbled a sequel for
>>
>>153439052
It's a fairy tale, if you can't think of anywhere to go that's an indictment of your skills as a creative, not of the property.
>>
>>153443316
Only the show was made by people who indeed had no standards and sucked
>>
>>153443591
Haha imagine if they made a Tangled sequel where her hair suddenly magically grew back, ruining the whole message about sacrificing it
>>
>>153444694
How common are fairy tale sequels outside of hollywood garbage? Gir any example?
>>
>>153439052
Stories like Strange World, Frozen 2, Wreck-it Ralph 2 and Toy Story 4 were totally worth telling, though.
>>
>>153439052
>no story worth telling
>makes a competent three season series
>>
File: IMG_6249.jpg (283 KB, 1800x900)
283 KB JPG
Where does this fit in the timeline?
>>
>>153439052

Tangled is highly satanic because it promotes the false religion of paganism. I'm glad Disney came to their senses for once
>>
>>153443591
>>153444757

this >>153443877 >>153445506
>>
The important question here is: Had there been a sequel, would Cassandra have been in it and if not, WHY NOT?!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
File: 1555267745146.png (285 KB, 500x678)
285 KB PNG
>>153447193
>Had there been a sequel, would Cassandra have been in it
Probably not
>if not, WHY NOT?!!!!!!!!!!!!
Because she deserves nothing
>>
>>153445763
KH would be so much better if it was just Mickey, Donald & Goofy invading Disney movies instead of this generic anime boi.
>>
>>153442364
disney fans just enjoy the comfort and safety of being surrounded by familiar colors and shapes. they applaud the presence of "fun" and get sad if there is unfamiliar scary new things that arn't cute.
>>
>>153447231
Yeah, fuck 'er. She was horribly written.
At least Varian had a logical motivation, even if the writing SURROUNDING him sucked.
Cassandra sucked through and through in Season 3.
>>
They can't really do a sequel when Eugene said "our story is over for real 100% don't even bother checking back in with us" at the end of the show. Unless of course it was about their kids or something. Me personally I want a Lance and his kids spinoff movie.

>>153447193
No and because her story is supposed to be left open ended. It fucks with the tone of the previous ending. Though tbf the series technically did that to the original movie too.
>>
>>153439052
And yet they somehow made several seasons of an animated cartoon out of it (which was unironically great).
>>
>>153448175
This clickbait article leaves out the detail that Nathan Greno had said this long before the series was created.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.