What do you think of Kris Anka's art and character design?
>>153450373Who’s that guy in the right with a cigar?
Art is okay, but I don't really like his costume redesigns. It is weird since I've read his comments on some of them and I agree about what he finds important on older ones, but the end result ones don't appeal to me.
>>153450403Nick Fury
>>153450373I like his art and some redesigns, but I hate when he puts his homoerotic or progressive shit with some male characters.
>>153450373His men look a bit effeminate and his women look too masculine. Design wise, seems dull.
>>153450712Yeah, right?
>>153450373He’s incapable of drawing the female form and his designs are almost always fucking atrocious. When he’s drawing male characters in classic designs he hasn’t altered he’s competent.
>>153450403How do you not know who Nick fury is?
>>153450712And when he draws feminine women, he also gives them a certain lesbian air
>>153450794He does so because it seems that doesn't want to "sexualize" the female characters and only seeks to them make it look cool or good and that's it.
>>153450937Samples
>>153450937I don’t fucking care. He’s incapable of drawing women and his design work is universally atrocious.
>>153450937That's all gay artists anon. Dauterman does it. Wada does it. Werneck does it. Schiti does it.
>>153450373looks like the product of a teenage girl off tumblr
When he sets his mind to it, he can make good designs or redesigns
>>153451398
>>153451423
>>153451326Only one I disagree with is Schiti he can draw some QTs. I’d add Travis Moore instead, that gay face dork. Dauterman’s art is grotesque.
>>153451443
>>153451443>>153451423>>153451398>put his mind to itYou mean when he’s not being a massive faggot like he was with every androgynous MAWS design?
>>153451460These are hideous
>>153451465Yep
>>153451524That or when they watch him and tell him not to be a faggot with the designs or poses
>>153451465This is the same reason I refuse to read absolute Wonder Woman. The androgynous shit disgusts me. Diana and all the women look like dudes, Steve and most of the dudes look like women.Anka is worse IMO. The reason I refused to watch MAWS.
>>153450815That’s not Nick Fury.
>>153451943It's Nick Fury's original design, it was always white... But for the MCU they used their Ultimate version from the 2000s, where he's black
>>153451943It very clearly is Nick fury.
>>153450373It’s so obvious all these are traced from stock photos. Which is even worse because he can draw normally. His redesigns are all way too gay and his women all look like men though. Never seen something from him I haven’t been repulsed by.
>>153452793>It’s so obvious all these are traced from stock photosI don't think using references or taking some shortcuts in drawing is bad.
If only they weren't afraid of success
>>153450373Draws good men. Draws not as good women. Too often they lose their curves and boobs.
>>153452857When the finished product looks like shit? It absolutely is. And tracing stock photos isnt “reference”.
>>153453491You know, he's "politically correct"If it's men, he sexualizes them as much as he wants. But if it is about women, no, because "you have to respect them" and blah, blah, blah...
>>153453620Let's see, turn images or pages of their comics that you consider to be shit
>>153451341What... Where is the "tumblr" in that drawing? You say that because of the flat colors?
>>153450794Sometimes he does manage to draw women, but that... Only sometimes
>>153450373Not as good as Paul Anka.
>>153456442That looks like a dude. No tits, broad shoulders, bulbous biceps. Was this a joke you were making?
His Miguel redesign is rancid shit
>>153454281The picture in OP is a perfect example. None of those figures look good a the line work combined with the lack of anatomical weighting is indicative of a tracer. Ffs Danny looks like he was cut in half and stitched to Namor. Caps pecs are two feet tall and his abs start three feet below his chin.
>>153458006His MAWS designs are far worse.
>>153458024
>>153458006What are you talking about? if it's a big redesign
>>153450373He's a got a decent eye for anatomy and body language, but his preference for men really colors his work. I'm not saying that as a dig at his homosexuality, but he puts so much effort into his male figure work that it's noticeable how lacking his women are in comparison, even (and especially) when he makes them more masculine.He favors character design over draftsman work, but the man has no idea what makes a memorable, iconic design that works on the page rather than as fodder for adaptations. >>153451049Pic very much related.
>>153458643Concession accepted. >>153459079Hes also a chronic over-designer. Lineslineslines all the time.
>>153451423Spider Cat, that’s cute
>>153450373His art is boring and he's basically patient zero for the gay appeal art that's infested the medium. Can't draw anything but ugly mannish women either. His costume designs are atrocious, boring, practicool garbage that's meant to be worn as cosplay or in movies but look like shit in an actual comic. Simultaneously lifeless and unimaginative while having too many extraneous details like lines that segment everything.
>>153450937He does it because he's not attracted to women and has no idea how to make an attractive one.
>>153451444Dauterman's problem is that he just gets a model, traces it and then adds features. He's like a a guy who makes soijaks except less creative.
>>153459425He is to superhero comics what Hajime Katoki is to mecha design. Lots of lines and pointless details that might look fine IRL (for movie costumes or gunpla) but look like overdesigned shit on page/animated.
>>153459425If I remember correctly, he had another twitter account where he uploaded nsfw content (mostly gay or femboy content, I think) but yes, sometimes he uploaded drawings of girls but when he drew them he did it in two ways... Either they were female characters from a franchise but he drew them more robustly (Sometimes they looked like those plump trans) and in lesbian situations or they were original characters also doing the same thing. And very rarely did heterosexual nsfw content
>>153450373I like it!
>>153450373Really good but you can tell he's gay
