[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/co/ - Comics & Cartoons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Do it again.
>>
>>153569151
Nintendo won't.
It's too close to release and they HATE to put any sort of money towards their games. To expect them to redesign and model the characters is silly. Also, Katt got the worst of it. Can't wait to see who the art director and artists were.
>>
>>153569151
Why? Everyone but Katt looks good
>>
>>153569151
Shrek's redesign was an objective improvement.
>>
>>153569222
and Falco
and Slippy
>>
>>153569262
Naw falco looks good. The strong reaction is forced
>>
>>153569318
he looks awful
>>
I kind of like that they went with something different than just cartoony bright colors like every other nintendo property.
But also I dont give a shit about starfox so what the fuck do I know about it
>>
File: Joe Family Guy.png (744 KB, 1366x768)
744 KB PNG
>>153569151
>Do it again.
This time with Beer.
>>
>>153569329
Naw the realistic look is reminiscent of Rango. It's kino
>>
>>>/v/
Also the new Shrek design is prefectly fine. I'd prefer if they kept him the same but I can live with the new one. I really don't get why dveryone hates it so much
>>
>>153569151
i still refuse to think they actually were dead serious with the shitty sonic design,they did it only to shill the movie by autism drama
>>
File: Fox.jpg (370 KB, 2000x1685)
370 KB JPG
>>153569151
I think the new designs look pretty good, but the in game lighting isn't very flattering to them. They look great in the promo art.
>>153569732
Executives are dumb anon. There was way too much time, effort and money that went into the ugly Sonic cut for it to be some kind of marketing stunt. They were just that retarded and, had they not gone back and approved a redesign, would've killed the movie right then and there.
>>
>>153569818
the tiny legs still ruin it
>>
Make them look like and move like puppets. You could still work with realistic textures and lighting with that. A good compromise between realistic and stylized cartoon, and it would be a callback to (what I assume) is one of the inspirations for Star Fox as well as the old ads
>>
File: Very annoyed.jpg (14 KB, 337x206)
14 KB JPG
>>153569151
>Another Starfox 64 remake.
Why not just port Star Fox Zero with better controls? And what's with the Call Of Duty style dialogue?
>Their designs look like the puppets and old SNES cover.
Cope, the game looks like an Unreal Engine Nintendo hire this man fan game. It's nice to see a majority of people shitting on it for once, Nintendo is long due for criticism.
>>
>>153570049
>Cope, the game looks like an Unreal Engine Nintendo hire this man fan game
It looks good though. Only furries hate the redesigns
>>
>>153570049
>Nintendo is long due for criticism.
You say that as if Nintendo hasn't been getting absolutely shit on since the Switch 2 was announced.
>>
File: 1758244175958801.mp4 (404 KB, 540x700)
404 KB
404 KB MP4
>>153569151
It's weird how they never did this to fix She-Hulk.
>>
>>153570120
I was thinking more of Miyomotos department. He needs to be criticized more than anyone since his dumb changes to Sticker Star.
>>
>>153569151
Nintendo doesn't give a shit
>>
>>153569151
Soulless to Soul

Soul to Soulless
>>
>>153569151
>>153569222
>>153569318
>>153569511
I think a redesign would be best, this one just doesn't have much appeal, at least not for a broader audience.
Just make them more like they were in Smash Bros, a stylized look, rather than aiming for realism.

I find it specially weird considering they just made him appear on that Mario movie, and everybody seemed to like his design in there. Why change it to something that is more uncanny?

But I know Nintendo won't. It's way too close to the release date for them to make any changes at this point. Plus, they're extremely prideful.
>>
File: 1748880651229830.jpg (239 KB, 827x823)
239 KB JPG
>>153569732
>i still refuse to think they actually were dead serious with the shitty sonic design
lol
>they did it only to shill the movie by autism drama
the only reason they bothered to redesign sonic was because EVERYONE was shitting on it, not just fans - even talk shows were joining in on the low-hanging fruit
the movie was basically dead in the water if they did nothing
>>
>>153569151
This image doesn't make any sense. The Shrek on the right is the original, not a "fixed" redesign.
>>
Falco and Fox looks really bad the others are passable. Thank god we don't really see them in detail most of the time. watch the story once then skip skip skip
>>
>>153569245
shrek's original design still stands up well today and the redesign will forever be remembered as being from this time. The redesign makes him generic and boring.
>>
>>153569151
Full fucking offense but Sonic was the only time it was even *possible* to do it.
>>
>>153569151
Both of those Foxes are an unhealthy extreme
blend the two and you're good

also stop making western movies about eastern properties. it's sick
>>
File: Star_Fox_Switch2_Renders.png (2.24 MB, 1795x832)
2.24 MB PNG
Villians looks better than the heroes
>>
>>153570235
>fixing what aint broken
>>
>>153575820
She has giant fuck-off man hands and no tits.
>>
>>153569151
shrek had a redesign?
>>
>>153575637
Gross. Slippy needs help.
>>
>>153569151
The Starfox remake looks good tho
>>
>>153569151
Don't fucking care
>>>/v/
>But starfox was in some obscure /co/ thing for 5 seconds once
Fuck you, leave
>>
>>153570253
the fuck are you talking about, people have been calling Miyamoto senile and begging him to retire for years now
>>
>>153569151
I genuinely don't understand the complaints with the new Star Fox designs other than the legs. They look a little weird (which I like) but they're not ugly.
>>
>>153577878
--said no one.
>>
>>153569151
The game comes out in a month. Not possible.
>>
File: 1772280465502.jpg (50 KB, 1079x1351)
50 KB JPG
>>153569151
Lol the Shrek 5 backlash was so pathetic. That fourth film is WAY older than some of you guys remember. It makes sense for DreamWorks to adapt the characters to fit their current design sensibilities
>>
>>153569818
i think its neat that fox has digitigrade boots but jesus they're still 70% torso and the three-quarters camera angle in the cockpit sucks compared to the head on



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.