Woah Disney they're only 12
>>153586105Katzenberg doesn't appreciate art when he sees it, fuck him for censoring The Black Cauldron.
Woah Luc Besson they're only 10
>>153587440Why did they make her look 30
>>153587145No
>>153587495They were originally going to have Tim Burton's designs, but they got rejected in favor of having the remaining "old men" work on it instead.
>>153587521How does that answer my question
>>153586105>>153587440its natural
>>153587495Yeah, she's pretty developed for her age
>>153587586My bad, here's some concept art.
>>153587615[samefag]>i just now realized anon's talking about that literal who french movieI'm terribly sorry, I thought you were talking about The Black Cauldron.
Katzenberg saved the studio
>>153587614Is there a version of this movie that's not 1.25 speed?
>>153587615Bizarre designsMakes me think more MAD magazine than Tim Burton
>>153586105"Now kiss!">jumps down and starts priming his red rocket for blastoffGurgi! Oh, you!
>>153586105Man, I used to get the feels for these kinda kissing scenes when I was a lad. I remember legitimately being disappointed at the end of The Princess and the Goblin when said princess fakes this guy out and pecks him on the cheek.
>Give the kid a sick ass sword>Take it away before the finaleGay
>>153586105Bro i just watched this movie, are you stalking me?
>>153586105Nothin' wrong with a good childhood romance~
>>153586105I wanted to kick that obnoxious sloth in the throat
>>153586105BOTH 12, so it is 100% okay.
>>153588372Wow that is gay
>>153586105Gurgi is into underage shipping. Somehow, this is not surprising.
>>153586105uhh what's the age of consent on kissing again?
>>153588372>We're Back>Little Nemogod, it was a smorgasbord of funny buzzy feelings
>>153586105What got this a cult following? I thought it was just ok when i watched this year.
>>153592009It was a Disney animated movie, and for 50 years those were considered big events. Plus, it was hyped heavily. There is also a group of people wishing to this day for an extended cut (which is still technically possible but Disney company would rather not apologize and admit wrongdoing EVER).
>>153592009The YA book series it was based on was fairly popular in the 70s and 80s, when basically everything Tolkein was too.Also it was Disney going darker than they had since Nightmare on Bald Mountain from Fantasia in the 40s and the Prince's fight with Maleficent in Sleeping Beauty in the 50s. The first time a mainline Disney animated movie wasn't rated G. The last hurrah for the original Old Men before they were gone.Count me as one who wishes there was an extended cut. The movie was 90% of the way to awesome, it really didn't need a lot of tweaking. Also, for the record, most of the movie is based on the first of 5 books in the series it was based on, The Book of Three. The book itself is very short and the kind of book that doesn't go deep on explaining anything. For example, the characters will bring up some mythic hero in conversation in one chapter and he'll literally turn up in the very next chapter and join the party. So the story guys at Disney had to expand on things to make it make sense.
